ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
George Washington Charter · Palm Desert

George Washington Charter: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

George Washington Charter posts 68% meeting the standard, and 37.9% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

45-768 Portola Avenue, 92260 (opens in new tab)·Desert Sands Unified·Palm Desert·Grades TK-5·746 students·50% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 862-4350·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5845
% Exceeded38%21%
% Met+68%43%
Growth-1.2-2.9
Absence10.8%17.9%
Suspension1.2%1.6%
Scope Score
58
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #1,159 statewide · #2 of 20 in Desert Sands Unified

George Washington Charter scores 58 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 80th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.

Most rating sites would stop at “68% proficient” and call it done. George Washington Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Palm Desert, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

George Washington Charter's low-income kids hit 61.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

As a charter, George Washington Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 80th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 68% meet the standard today, versus 73% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 374%74%76%66%66%
Grade 477%74%71%71%72%
Grade 577%69%70%72%71%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 385%71%79%72%70%
Grade 470%60%67%70%70%
Grade 556%51%48%54%62%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

36%
30%
34%
Grade 3 · 66% proficient
45%
27%
28%
Grade 4 · 72% proficient
41%
29%
30%
Grade 5 · 70% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 5.2pp across grades; the floor rises 5.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

61.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

George Washington Charter's most underrated number

61.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

George Washington Charter low-income: 61.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
37.9%
State 21.3%
16.6pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-1.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
68.4%
State 42.7%
25.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
10.8%
State 17.9%
7.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.2%
State 1.6%
0.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At George Washington Charter in Palm Desert, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.2% Math proficient); White students (74.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 187 students tested.

All students at this school: 68% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 68%, district —, state 43%68%
MaleMale: this school 68%, district 33%, state 42%68% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 59%, district 28%, state 32%59% · −9 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 72%, district 55%, state 56%72% · +4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 69%, district 36%, state 44%69% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 57%, district 29%, state 32%57% · −11 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 38%, district 8%, state 15%38% · −31 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 81%, district 40%, state 56%81% · +13 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 10.8%, district 29.9%, state 17.9%10.8% · −7.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 1.6%1.2% · −0.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–69.5%
TK/K12.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
George Washington CharterCharter
58/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 24:126:1
Teaching staff36 teachers
Avg. experience15.4 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,775 – $132,451
Principal salary$167,765 – $193,176
Superintendent salary$327,601

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $15,810, CA average $14,815$15,810 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$63 per student

$63 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,375 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction57%
Instruction support13%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other4%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,985 per pupil
2019$13,292 per pupil
2018$13,157 per pupil
2017$12,561 per pupil
2016$12,166 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White49.9%
District 14.4% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic35.9%
District 76.8% · CA 56.1%
Other9.0%
District 5.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian4.4%
District 2.2% · CA 10.2%
Black0.8%
District 1.3% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 50.3% (14pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$70K · CA $85K
Median home value$490K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population30,523
Median age59 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 746 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 65% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is George Washington Charter a good elementary school?

George Washington Charter has a Scope Score of 58 out of 100, placing it in the 80th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,159 statewide. 37.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.6 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are George Washington Charter's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 68.4% of students at George Washington Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 37.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 37.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 744 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does George Washington Charter rank in California?

George Washington Charter ranks #1,159 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 80th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is George Washington Charter getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at George Washington Charter decreases by 1.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at George Washington Charter?

10.8% of students at George Washington Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does George Washington Charter compare to other schools in Palm Desert?

George Washington Charter scores 58/100 (80th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 746 students. Use the schools in Palm Desert page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does George Washington Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At George Washington Charter in Palm Desert, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.2% Math proficient); White students (74.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 187 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
37.9%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 66th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-1.2pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
68.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 70th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
10.8%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 53th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312536%30%14%20%66%+22
Grade 412845%27%20%8%72%+27
Grade 511941%29%20%9%71%+23
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312532%38%18%12%70%+24
Grade 412835%35%23%7%70%+29
Grade 511938%24%26%12%62%+27
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1111934%31%33%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18761.5%+26+23
White18674.2%+12+12
Hispanic/Latino12857.0%+21+18
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
George Washington Charter ←5837.9%68.4%−1.21.2%
James Earl Carter Elementary2.1 mi5130.9%53.5%+4.02.1%
Abraham Lincoln Elementary1.2 mi4111.6%30.6%+2.53.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196383#92043.3%73.2%3.0%0.1%-12.7pp
20225380#113335.5%66.5%21.4%0.0%-12.3pp
20235681#109640.7%68.8%17.6%0.0%-18.2pp
20245779#118938.8%67.7%11.8%0.1%-6.0pp
20255880#115937.9%68.4%10.8%1.2%-1.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female2.7%8.2%+5.5pp
Male3.1%12.8%+9.7pp
Asian0.0%3.0%+3.0pp
Black/African American0.0%
Hispanic/Latino3.7%12.8%+9.1pp
Two or More Races7.7%11.8%+4.1pp
Students with Disabilities9.4%11.1%+1.7pp
English Learners4.3%11.1%+6.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4.8%13.6%+8.8pp
All Students2.9%10.5%+7.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction