ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
George McParland Elementary · Manteca

George McParland Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

George McParland posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1601 Northgate Drive, 95336 (opens in new tab)·Manteca Unified·Manteca·Grades TK-8·1,195 students·61% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 858-7290·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3245
% Exceeded7%21%
% Met+28%43%
Growth-0.3-2.9
Absence23.9%17.9%
Suspension2.3%1.6%
Scope Score
32
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,494 statewide · #8 of 20 in Manteca Unified

George McParland Elementary scores 32 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 22nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “28% proficient” and call it done. George McParland deserves a closer read. The school sits in Manteca, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 57th to the 22nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 28% meet the standard today, versus 51% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 358%47%32%32%27%
Grade 459%38%43%29%31%
Grade 555%49%46%46%37%
Grade 659%46%45%37%47%
Grade 770%57%57%42%48%
Grade 872%53%67%60%43%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 349%42%27%36%30%
Grade 455%33%25%20%26%
Grade 530%27%24%24%19%
Grade 649%34%34%30%27%
Grade 750%28%25%19%36%
Grade 870%46%55%53%44%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
73%
Grade 3 · 27% proficient
10%
21%
69%
Grade 4 · 31% proficient
30%
63%
Grade 5 · 37% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.2%
State 21.3%
14.1pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-0.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
28.1%
State 42.7%
14.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
23.9%
State 17.9%
5.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.3%
State 1.6%
0.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
25.9%
State 18.0%
7.9pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At George McParland Elementary in Manteca, 34.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George McParland Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.3 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 464 students tested.

All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 43%35%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 26%, state 32%30% · −5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 31%, district 23%, state 32%31% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 31%, state 44%36% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 33%, district 28%, state 42%33% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 37%, district 33%, state 56%37% · +2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 7%, state 15%12% · −22 vs school

9 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 23.9%, district 24.3%, state 17.9%23.9% · +5.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.3%, district —, state 1.6%2.3% · +0.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (35.4% vs 20.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.1%
Grades 7–820.8%
TK/K35.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
George McParland Elementary
32/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 24:127:1
Teaching staff51 teachers
Avg. experience15.4 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,521 – $125,430
Principal salary$190,036 – $204,844
Superintendent salary$382,713

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $12,470, CA average $14,815$12,470 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$215 per student

$215 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,863 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support14%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,831 per pupil
2019$11,417 per pupil
2018$12,178 per pupil
2017$11,523 per pupil
2016$10,492 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic52.9%
District 55.4% · CA 56.1%
White30.3%
District 13.8% · CA 19.9%
Other8.0%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian7.3%
District 14.7% · CA 10.2%
Black1.6%
District 5.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 61.1% (3pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$89K · CA $85K
Median home value$546K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+17% · CA 35%
ZIP population50,185
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,195 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 19% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is George McParland Elementary a good elementary school?

George McParland Elementary has a Scope Score of 32 out of 100, placing it in the 22nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,494 statewide. 7.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.1 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are George McParland Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 28.1% of students at George McParland Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 735 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does George McParland Elementary rank in California?

George McParland Elementary ranks #4,494 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is George McParland Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at George McParland Elementary decreases by 0.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at George McParland Elementary?

23.9% of students at George McParland Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does George McParland Elementary compare to other schools in Manteca?

George McParland Elementary scores 32/100 (22nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,195 students. Use the schools in Manteca page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does George McParland Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At George McParland Elementary in Manteca, 34.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George McParland Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.3 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 464 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
7.2%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 36th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-0.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 43th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
28.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 39th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
23.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 40th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.3%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 45th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
25.9%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31167%20%25%48%27%−17
Grade 412610%21%28%41%31%−14
Grade 51287%30%20%43%37%−11
Grade 612717%30%26%27%47%+1
Grade 71309%39%26%25%48%+1
Grade 811911%32%34%24%43%−3
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311510%19%26%44%30%−16
Grade 41233%23%40%34%26%−16
Grade 51276%13%32%49%19%−16
Grade 612815%12%37%37%27%−8
Grade 712912%25%25%39%36%+2
Grade 811924%20%31%25%44%+11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112443%16%61%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged46434.5%+2−4
Hispanic/Latino39135.3%+5−4
White23742.6%+1−19
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
George McParland Elementary ←327.2%28.1%−0.32.3%
Brock Elliott Elementary2.3 mi358.6%27.5%+1.43.5%
Shasta Elementary2.1 mi344.7%19.6%+13.92.9%
Joseph Widmer Jr. Elementary2.3 mi307.2%21.3%−6.03.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194557#236020.4%51.1%10.2%2.4%-11.0pp
20223343#325514.3%39.3%37.5%2.2%-7.1pp
20234154#261012.4%32.7%27.0%2.6%+5.6pp
20243325#429210.3%31.2%20.9%2.3%+1.2pp
20253222#44947.2%28.1%23.9%2.3%-0.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.8%24.3%+14.5pp
Male10.6%23.8%+13.2pp
Asian8.3%26.8%+18.5pp
Black/African American22.2%35.7%+13.5pp
White0.0%19.4%+19.4pp
Hispanic/Latino9.6%25.1%+15.5pp
Two or More Races22.5%27.1%+4.6pp
Students with Disabilities22.4%33.3%+10.9pp
English Learners11.0%29.6%+18.6pp
Homeless26.8%26.9%+0.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.8%27.2%+13.4pp
All Students10.2%24.1%+13.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction