ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Garfield Elementary · EurekaPublic

Garfield Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Garfield posts 55.5% exceeding the standard — versus 21.4% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

2200 Freshwater Road, 95503 (opens in new tab)·Garfield Elementary·Eureka·Grades TK-6·73 students·27% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(707) 442-5471·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7639
% Exceeded55%21%
% Met+83%43%
Growth
Absence15.2%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
76
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #159 statewide

Garfield Elementary scores 76 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 97th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “83% proficient” and call it done. Garfield deserves a closer read. The school sits in Eureka, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 55.5% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.4%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 85th to the 97th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.

ELAGreen(Declined)MathBlue(Increased)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 83% of students meet the standard today, above the 77% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 369%86%71%
Grade 475%86%
Grade 591%73%92%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 377%93%93%
Grade 458%93%
Grade 564%55%77%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
55.5%
State 21.4%
34.1pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
83.4%
State 42.7%
40.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.2%
State 17.9%
2.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
+2.5pp
State -2.9pp
No same-cohort record for this school, so growth is left out of its Scope Score altogether and the other measures carry more of the weight. The number here is this year's grade 3 against this year's grade 5 — different children, not a cohort followed over time. Compared against the state's own grade gap, which is the only fair reading of it.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits a little above the middle of California elementary schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.

California's growth model, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +7 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 70th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.70th pctile · +7 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +7 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 68th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.68th pctile · +7 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

All students at this school: 83% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 83%, district —, state 43%83%
WhiteWhite: this school 88%, district 88%, state 56%88% · +5 vs school

8 of 10 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only30 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +7 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 30 students.+7 pts · +4 vs typical
Math
English Only30 studentsEnglish Only, math: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 30 students.+6 pts · +5 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.2%, district 15.2%, state 17.9%15.2% · −2.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.1%
TK/K17.6%

Where the path goes

Garfield Elementary serves grades TK-6. We don’t have attendance-boundary data showing which high school students here continue to, and we’d rather leave this blank than guess from whichever school happens to be nearest. The district office can tell you which high school your address is zoned for.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 18:118:1
PrincipalMichael Quinlan
Teaching staff6 teachers
Avg. experience7.0 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers17%

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,797, CA average $14,491$16,797 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,143 per student

$1,143 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,142 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support20%
Student services2%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance6%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,034 per pupil
2019$11,712 per pupil
2018$13,453 per pupil
2017$12,355 per pupil
2016$10,797 per pupil

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
White82.2%
District 82.2% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic9.6%
District 9.6% · CA 56.1%
Other6.8%
District 6.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.4%
District 1.4% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 27.4% (36pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$72K · CA $85K
Median home value$445K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+29% · CA 35%
ZIP population25,054
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 73 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 77% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Garfield Elementary a good elementary school?

Garfield Elementary has a Scope Score of 76 out of 100, placing it in the 97th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #159 statewide. 55.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 34.1 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Garfield Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 83.4% of students at Garfield Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 55.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 27.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 55.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 54 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Garfield Elementary rank in California?

Garfield Elementary ranks #159 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 97th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Garfield Elementary?

15.2% of students at Garfield Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Garfield Elementary compare to other schools in Eureka?

Garfield Elementary scores 76/100 (97th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 73 students. Use the schools in Eureka page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
55.5%
↑ vs CA 21.4% · 80th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
83.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 79th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 54th pctile
▼ 0.6pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
→ no change vs 2024
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) · not scored
+2.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31457%14%21%7%71%+28
Grade 410
Grade 51346%46%8%0%92%+45
Grade 610
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31457%36%7%0%93%+47
Grade 410
Grade 51362%15%23%0%77%+42
Grade 610

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide1346%31%23%0%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Garfield Elementary ←7655.5%83.4%+2.5pp0.6%
California average3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20196285#83645.5%77.3%10.2%0.9%
20226588#66050.0%73.1%26.0%1.4%
20236488#69142.3%78.0%20.1%0.6%
20247797#14560.2%76.5%15.7%0.6%
20257697#15955.5%83.4%15.2%0.6%+2.5pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — No subgroup comparison could be shown for this school this year — either its group sizes fall under CDE's 15-student reporting floor, or district/state comparison data wasn't available for its groups.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.7%15.8%+5.1pp
Male8.1%11.6%+3.5pp
Students with Disabilities0.0%14.3%+14.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19.0%20.8%+1.8pp
All Students9.2%13.6%+4.4pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+730Accelerated+730Accelerated
English Only+730not categorised+630not categorised
White+922Accelerated+522Accelerated

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/garfield-elementary-7892"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Garfield Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction