ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Fairfax Elementary · San Bernardino

Fairfax Elementary: Scores climb 15.0 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But the zoned next school scores lower.

Fairfax holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4445
% Exceeded13%21%
% Met+32%43%
Growth+15.0-2.9
Absence29.9%17.9%
Suspension3.0%1.6%
Scope Score
44
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #2,592 statewide · #12 of 55 in San Bernardino City Unified

Fairfax Elementary scores 44 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 55th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Fairfax deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Bernardino, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +15.0pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 5th to the 55th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2600 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 32% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 347%18%17%25%33%
Grade 425%27%24%38%30%
Grade 527%40%27%16%49%
Grade 621%34%38%15%22%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 343%20%28%23%22%
Grade 421%20%24%40%22%
Grade 518%19%14%11%36%
Grade 69%14%33%10%16%

The story this school is actually telling

The trajectory · grade 3→5
+15.0pp

separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

↑ the school's value-add, not the zip code's
The next step · the zoned path
16pts

the zoned path continues to Golden Valley Middle, which scores 16 points lower — a school visit will tell you more than this number.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
20%
67%
Grade 3 · 33% proficient
16%
14%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
15%
34%
51%
Grade 5 · 49% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.6pp across grades; the floor rises 15.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.9%
State 21.3%
8.4pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+15.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
32.1%
State 42.7%
10.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
29.9%
State 17.9%
12.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.0%
State 1.6%
1.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.7%
State 18.0%
8.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Fairfax Elementary in San Bernardino, 33.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Fairfax Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 182 students tested.

All students at this school: 29% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 29%, district —, state 43%29%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 29%, district 28%, state 32%29% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 30%, district 29%, state 32%30% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 29%, district 29%, state 42%29% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 30%, district 30%, state 44%30% · +0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 15%, district 9%, state 11%15% · −15 vs school

10 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 29.9%, district 29.3%, state 17.9%29.9% · +12.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.0%, district —, state 1.6%3.0% · +1.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–632.7%
TK/K36.0%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Golden Valley Middle, which scores 16 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 22:124:1
Teaching staff16 teachers
Avg. experience14.2 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers13%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,927 – $136,734
Principal salary$170,815 – $190,823
Superintendent salary$413,775

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,405, CA average $14,815$25,405 · spent at this school
Federal share$567 per student

$567 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,775 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,530 per pupil
2019$15,782 per pupil
2018$15,714 per pupil
2017$13,451 per pupil
2016$12,603 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic85.0%
District 82.2% · CA 56.1%
Black7.2%
District 9.3% · CA 4.8%
White3.3%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Other3.3%
District 3.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.1%
District 1.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 97.2% (33pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$67K · CA $85K
Median home value$426K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+11% · CA 35%
ZIP population63,243
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 28% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fairfax Elementary a good elementary school?

Fairfax Elementary has a Scope Score of 44 out of 100, placing it in the 55th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,592 statewide. 12.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 8.4 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Fairfax Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.1% of students at Fairfax Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 296 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Fairfax Elementary rank in California?

Fairfax Elementary ranks #2,592 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 55th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Fairfax Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Fairfax Elementary increases by 15.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Fairfax Elementary?

29.9% of students at Fairfax Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Fairfax Elementary compare to other schools in San Bernardino?

Fairfax Elementary scores 44/100 (55th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 359 students. Use the schools in San Bernardino page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Fairfax Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Fairfax Elementary in San Bernardino, 33.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Fairfax Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 182 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.9%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 42th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+15.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 74th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
32.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 42th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
29.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 31th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.0%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 39th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34513%20%29%38%33%−10
Grade 45616%14%18%52%30%−14
Grade 54715%34%19%32%49%+1
Grade 6373%19%46%32%22%−25
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3464%17%33%46%22%−24
Grade 4555%16%38%40%22%−20
Grade 54723%13%26%38%36%+1
Grade 6373%14%22%62%16%−19
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11462%26%59%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18233.5%−1−5
Hispanic/Latino15634.6%−1−4
English Learners2817.9%+8+7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Fairfax Elementary ←4412.9%32.1%+15.03.0%
Ballington Academy for the Arts and Sciences - San2 mi6217.9%42.8%+58.50.3%
Savant Preparatory Academy of Business1.5 mi5336.4%58.8%−12.813.6%
iEmpire Academy1 mi4913.0%32.5%−23.62.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019225#52339.4%30.0%22.9%1.0%-22.4pp
20223651#28336.5%24.0%49.7%0.9%+10.1pp
20232615#48676.8%22.6%45.1%2.6%-2.2pp
20242713#50129.9%25.6%26.8%3.2%-10.6pp
20254455#259212.9%32.1%29.9%3.0%+15.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female23.7%30.9%+7.2pp
Male22.7%31.4%+8.7pp
Black/African American27.3%53.3%+26.0pp
Hispanic/Latino22.0%28.5%+6.5pp
Students with Disabilities21.7%41.3%+19.6pp
English Learners16.1%27.4%+11.3pp
Foster Youth44.4%
Homeless33.9%48.2%+14.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged23.2%31.8%+8.6pp
All Students23.2%31.1%+7.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction