Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac posts 37% meeting the standard and 16.1% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 41 | 16% | 37% | +7.4 | 27.5% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac scores 41 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 46th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “37% proficient” and call it done. Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac deserves a closer read. It sits at the 46th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 33rd to the 46th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 600 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 37% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 33% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 28% |
| Grade 4 | 42% | 35% | 40% | 48% | 33% |
| Grade 5 | 32% | 55% | 47% | 46% | 51% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 37% | 28% | 50% | 29% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 39% | 30% | 35% | 46% | 36% |
| Grade 5 | 27% | 40% | 32% | 37% | 33% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 9.2pp across grades; the floor rises 22.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac in Los Angeles, 37.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac trails its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (43.0% vs 21.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$2,724 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 30% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac a good elementary school?
What are Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac's CAASPP test scores?
How does Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac rank in California?
Is Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac?
How does Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 59
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 46
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 57
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68 | 13% | 15% | 24% | 49% | 28% | −15 |
| Grade 4 | 82 | 15% | 18% | 26% | 41% | 33% | −12 |
| Grade 5 | 89 | 22% | 28% | 21% | 28% | 51% | +3 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68 | 19% | 22% | 25% | 34% | 41% | −5 |
| Grade 4 | 84 | 11% | 25% | 32% | 32% | 36% | −6 |
| Grade 5 | 90 | 17% | 17% | 23% | 43% | 33% | −2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 90 | 6% | 24% | 52% | 18% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 227 | 37.4% | −3 | −1 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 226 | 38.5% | −3 | −0 |
| English Learners | 35 | 17.1% | +10 | +7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac ← | — | 41 | 16.1% | 36.9% | +7.4 | 0.1% |
| Sixty-First Street Elementary | 1.8 mi | 61 | 18.8% | 38.5% | −3.7 | 0.4% |
| Vernon City Elementary | 1.8 mi | 59 | 37.0% | 59.4% | −31.9 | 0.3% |
| West Vernon Avenue Elementary | 2.2 mi | 57 | 19.1% | 41.8% | +5.9 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 36 | 33 | #3677 | 13.4% | 35.0% | 15.6% | 0.0% | -5.3pp |
| 2022 | 48 | 74 | #1502 | 14.5% | 34.6% | 41.7% | 0.0% | +24.0pp |
| 2023 | 39 | 50 | #2857 | 17.5% | 39.5% | 32.5% | 0.0% | -1.8pp |
| 2024 | 48 | 65 | #1996 | 17.8% | 39.2% | 29.7% | 0.1% | +11.6pp |
| 2025 | 41 | 46 | #3113 | 16.1% | 36.9% | 27.5% | 0.1% | +7.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 15.2% | 27.0% | +11.8pp |
| Male | 16.2% | 29.2% | +13.0pp |
| Black/African American | 31.6% | 57.1% | +25.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.7% | 27.1% | +12.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 8.8% | 22.4% | +13.6pp |
| English Learners | 15.2% | 25.9% | +10.7pp |
| Homeless | 32.1% | 34.6% | +2.5pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 15.8% | 28.4% | +12.6pp |
| All Students | 15.7% | 28.1% | +12.4pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction