Schools in 90001 — Los Angeles, California: 18 schools. Average score 2.8 points below the state. Here is what that number does — and doesn't — tell you.
90001 has 18 ranked schools in Los Angeles, averaging a Scope Score of 42.1/100 — 2.8 points below the state average of 44.8 (CDE CAASPP 2025). Scores range from 29.2 to 51.8, a 22.6-point spread.
How 90001 schools perform
The top-ranked school is Florence Avenue Elementary with a Scope Score of 52 and 25.7% of students exceeding standard.
Chronic absenteeism across 90001 averages 26.6%, above the state average of 17.9%. CDE CAASPP 2025.
How 90001 compares to nearby zip codes
| Zip | City | Schools | Avg Score | vs 90001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90001 | Los Angeles | 18 | Developing 42.1/100 | — |
| 90002 | Los Angeles | 10 | Developing 40.1/100 | -1.9 |
| 90003 | Los Angeles | 20 | Developing 38.4/100 | -3.7 |
| 90004 | Los Angeles | 15 | Solid 50.8/100 | +8.7 |
| 90005 | Los Angeles | 12 | Developing 45.8/100 | +3.8 |
| 90006 | Los Angeles | 7 | Developing 39.7/100 | -2.3 |
Source: CDE CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
School archetypes in 90001
Hidden gems: 4 schools in 90001 are classified as Growth Engine (2) or On the Rise (2) — showing positive growth trajectories that raw proficiency scores alone don't capture. These are schools where students leave with more than they arrived with.
Archetypes are data-driven labels based on Scope Score dimensions. Learn more
All schools in 90001
ranked by Scope Score · 2024–25 CAASPP
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florence Avenue Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 25.7% | Solid 52/100 |
| 2 | Public Service Community at Diego Rivera Learning Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 17.9% | Solid 51/100 |
| 3 | Animo Pat Brown Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 15.8% | Developing 50/100 |
| 4 | Diego Rivera Learning Complex Green Design STEAM A Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 17.6% | Developing 48/100 |
| 5 | Alliance Kory Hunter Middle Los Angeles Unified Growth Engine | 11.1% | Developing 46/100 |
| 6 | Animo Florence-Firestone Charter Middle Los Angeles Unified Growth Engine | 9.2% | Developing 45/100 |
| 7 | Wisdom Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 15.0% | Developing 45/100 |
| 8 | Lillian Street Elementary Los Angeles Unified Culture First | 11.0% | Developing 44/100 |
| 9 | Communication and Technology at Diego Rivera Learn Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 14.3% | Developing 44/100 |
| 10 | Performing Arts Community at Diego Rivera Learning Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 8.4% | Developing 42/100 |
| 11 | Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Ac Los Angeles Unified On the Rise | 16.1% | Developing 41/100 |
| 12 | University Pathways Public Service Academy Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 6.9% | Developing 40/100 |
| 13 | Parmelee Avenue Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 13.8% | Developing 39/100 |
| 14 | Russell Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 15.6% | Developing 38/100 |
| 15 | Miramonte Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 5.5% | Developing 37/100 |
| 16 | Thomas A. Edison Middle Los Angeles Unified On the Rise | 9.5% | Developing 33/100 |
| 17 | Graham Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 9.0% | Developing 32/100 |
| 18 | McKinley Avenue Elementary Los Angeles Unified Building Momentum | 6.9% | Needs Support 29/100 |
Schools in 90001 on the map
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
Numbers tell you whether students are clearing the bar. A school visit tells you whether they're happy doing it. These metrics are intentionally missing from the Scope Score: class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality; arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs; teacher experience and turnover; campus safety and social-emotional support; parent and community engagement; quality of special education and gifted programs; how school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access. Full methodology