ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Fresno

Crescent View South II: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Crescent View South II posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.5% vs 3.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

4348 West Shaw Avenue, 93706 (opens in new tab)·Westside Elementary·Fresno·Grades K-12·1,260 students·90% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(559) 389-7270·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Scope Score
30
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,657 statewide

Crescent View South II scores 30 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 23rd percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “20% proficient” and call it done. Crescent View South II deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fresno, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

As a charter, Crescent View South II enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.

The 4 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.6%
State 15.8%
10.3pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
19.6%
State 35.7%
16.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
59.1%
State 30.2%
28.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.5%
State 3.6%
3.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
High
Crescent View South II
30
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic16.4%
White65.7%
Asian2.1%
Black6.1%
Other9.7%
GenderFemale 45.8%Male 53.6%Non-binary 0.6%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.8% (26pp above CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
1,260
Near CA avg (~1,200)
Transitional Kindergarten
TK status unconfirmed
No TK enrollment is on file with the state for this school — that isn't the same as “no TK.” Confirm directly with the district.
Student-Teacher Ratio
28:1
7 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$22,911
CA avg: $14,815 · District avg · NCES F-33
At Crescent View South II in Fresno, 31.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Crescent View South II outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.3% Math proficient); White students (30.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 332 students tested.
Equity Gaps
ELA · English Learner−28.1pp
1.8% vs 29.9% overall · n=56
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Black−7.3pp
0.0% vs 7.3% overall · n=17
Math · Black−9.3pp
0.0% vs 9.3% overall · n=17
Math Exceeded · Black−3.9pp
0.0% vs 3.9% overall · n=17

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income332 tested
ELA 31.0%·Math 9.3%· +4.6pp vs district
White220 tested
ELA 30.0%·Math 9.1%
Hispanic109 tested
ELA 32.1%·Math 10.1%· -4.4pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 49%Support 43%Other 8%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$41K
$44K below CA median
Median Home Value
$240K
$419K below CA median
Bachelor's+
9%
26pp below CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
11.3 years avg experience
52 teachers · 2% first-year · 6% second-year
Teacher Credentials
17% fully credentialed
0.1% on intern/emergency permit
CTE Pathway Completers
3 completed a career pathway

Sources: CDE SARC · CDE College/Career Indicator, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →
For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 22%
5.6%
↓ vs CA 15.8% · 39th pctile
Met or exceeded · 18%
19.6%
↓ vs CA 35.7% · 39th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
59.1%
↓ vs CA 30.2% · 26th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.5%
↑ vs CA 3.6% · 64th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 113857%23%35%35%30%−17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 113854%5%14%77%9%−14
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11340%24%65%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged33231.0%+5−7
White22030.0%−32
Hispanic/Latino10932.1%−4−7
03Peer comparison · nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Crescent View South II ←305.6%19.6%0.5%
Central East High1.5 mi439.0%31.3%2.4%
Dewolf Continuation High2.3 mi271.7%8.9%5.2%
California average4415.8%35.7%3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
AP Exam Prepared
Not offered
This school may not offer AP courses
Scope Score history
29%30%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #1576 → #1589 → #1688 → #1716 → #1657
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as a high school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,160 high schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

Frequently asked questions

Is Crescent View South II a good high school?
Crescent View South II has a Scope Score of 30 out of 100, placing it in the 23rd percentile of California high schools and ranked #1,657 statewide. 5.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.3 percentage points below the California average of 15.8%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for high schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Crescent View South II's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 19.6% of students at Crescent View South II met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 770 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Crescent View South II rank in California?
Crescent View South II ranks #1,657 among California high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 23rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Crescent View South II?
59.1% of students at Crescent View South II are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 30.2%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Crescent View South II compare to other schools in Fresno?
Crescent View South II scores 30/100 (23rd percentile) among California high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,260 students. Use the schools in Fresno page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.
How does Crescent View South II serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Crescent View South II in Fresno, 31.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Crescent View South II outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.3% Math proficient); White students (30.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 28.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 332 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.