ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Coral Mountain Academy · Coachella

Coral Mountain Academy: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Coral Mountain Academy posts 32% meeting the standard and 10.8% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

51-375 Van Buren Street, 92236 (opens in new tab)·Coachella Valley Unified·Coachella·Grades TK-6·815 students·83% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 398-3525·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+32%43%
Growth+2.2-2.9
Absence26.9%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,506 statewide · #3 of 14 in Coachella Valley Unified

Coral Mountain Academy scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 39th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Coral Mountain Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Coachella, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 51st to the 39th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 32% meet the standard today, versus 35% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 332%39%29%35%26%
Grade 431%29%33%25%32%
Grade 549%44%28%39%38%
Grade 652%37%38%38%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%32%25%30%34%
Grade 428%19%23%27%34%
Grade 536%17%15%21%26%
Grade 638%23%21%20%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
13%
74%
Grade 3 · 26% proficient
14%
18%
68%
Grade 4 · 32% proficient
10%
28%
62%
Grade 5 · 38% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.9pp across grades; the floor rises 12.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.8%
State 21.3%
10.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+2.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
31.7%
State 42.7%
11.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
26.9%
State 17.9%
9.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.1%
State 18.0%
3.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Coral Mountain Academy in Coachella, 31.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Coral Mountain Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 428 students tested.

All students at this school: 34% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 34%, district —, state 43%34%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 25%, state 32%33% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 24%, state 32%30% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 24%, state 42%34% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 33%, district 26%, state 44%33% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 9%, state 11%10% · −23 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 8%, state 15%6% · −27 vs school

6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 11.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 26.9%, district 34.3%, state 17.9%26.9% · +9.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.0pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (37.2% vs 24.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–624.1%
TK/K37.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 22:124:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience21.2 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,655 – $136,033
Principal salary$174,858 – $197,928
Superintendent salary$300,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,880, CA average $14,815$25,880 · spent at this school
Federal share$1 per student

$1 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,961 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support11%
Student services11%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,179 per pupil
2019$14,627 per pupil
2018$14,846 per pupil
2017$14,930 per pupil
2016$14,857 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic97.5%
District 97.8% · CA 56.1%
White1.7%
District 1.0% · CA 19.9%
Other0.4%
District 0.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.3%
District 0.1% · CA 10.2%
Black0.1%
District 0.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 83.3% (20pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$68K · CA $85K
Median home value$369K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+8% · CA 35%
ZIP population43,642
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 815 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Coral Mountain Academy a good elementary school?

Coral Mountain Academy has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 39th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,506 statewide. 10.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Coral Mountain Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 31.7% of students at Coral Mountain Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 715 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Coral Mountain Academy rank in California?

Coral Mountain Academy ranks #3,506 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 39th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Coral Mountain Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Coral Mountain Academy increases by 2.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Coral Mountain Academy?

26.9% of students at Coral Mountain Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Coral Mountain Academy compare to other schools in Coachella?

Coral Mountain Academy scores 38/100 (39th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 815 students. Use the schools in Coachella page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Coral Mountain Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Coral Mountain Academy in Coachella, 31.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Coral Mountain Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 428 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 40th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+2.2pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 56th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
31.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 42th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
26.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 35th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.1%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312613%13%32%42%26%−17
Grade 410914%18%26%42%32%−13
Grade 512310%28%20%41%38%−10
Grade 614514%31%24%31%45%−2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31259%25%26%40%34%−12
Grade 41097%27%32%34%34%−8
Grade 512312%14%28%46%26%−9
Grade 614412%21%31%37%33%−2
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111254%10%59%27%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged42831.2%+2−7
Hispanic/Latino49035.6%+6−3
English Learners18010.0%+1−0
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Coral Mountain Academy ←3810.8%31.7%+2.20.6%
Martin Van Buren Elementary1.9 mi5016.9%38.2%+8.21.0%
Peter Pendleton Elementary0.8 mi4620.2%51.4%−1.22.3%
Imagine Schools, Riverside County0.6 mi439.9%29.7%−8.81.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194351#267213.5%35.5%10.0%0.3%+7.7pp
20223137#35899.7%29.9%38.8%0.7%-5.0pp
20233027#416810.0%25.5%38.5%0.7%-5.5pp
20243428#41539.7%29.3%30.7%0.8%-2.7pp
20253839#350610.8%31.7%26.9%0.6%+2.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.1%29.8%+18.7pp
Male8.9%25.0%+16.1pp
Hispanic/Latino10.0%27.3%+17.3pp
Students with Disabilities11.4%26.5%+15.1pp
English Learners8.9%23.5%+14.6pp
Military-Connected0.0%28.6%+28.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.6%29.5%+18.9pp
All Students10.0%27.3%+17.3pp
Homeless22.2%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction