School district · Riverside County

Coachella Valley Unified schools

Coachella Valley Unified’s 15 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 44th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 15 schools

from 1st to 44th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Cesar Chavez Elementary: 44th percentile, Developing
  • Westside Elementary: 38th percentile, Developing
  • Coral Mountain Academy: 27th percentile, Developing
  • Peter Pendleton Elementary: 26th percentile, Developing
  • Valley View Elementary: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Valle del Sol Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • North Shore Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Mountain Vista Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Palm View Elementary: 19th percentile, Needs Support
  • Saul Martinez Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
  • Las Palmitas Elementary: 15th percentile, Needs Support
  • Mecca Elementary: 4th percentile, Needs Support
  • Oasis Elementary: 3rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Sea View Elementary: 1st percentile, Needs Support
  • John Kelley Elementary: 1st percentile, Needs Support
11Needs Support
4Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 3 schools

from 4th to 35th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Cahuilla Desert Academy Junior High: 35th percentile, Developing
  • Bobby Duke Middle: 13th percentile, Needs Support
  • Toro Canyon Middle: 4th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
0Strong

High · 4 schools

from 14th to 51st · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • NOVA Academy - Coachella: 51st percentile, Solid
  • Coachella Valley High: 28th percentile, Developing
  • Desert Mirage High: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • West Shores High: 14th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Coachella Valley Unified

23 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Coachella Valley Unified score highest?

Cesar Chavez Elementary is highest, at the 44th percentile.

That’s higher than 44 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Coachella Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 12 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Coachella Valley Unified had 32 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Coachella Valley Unified score highest?

Cahuilla Desert Academy Junior High is highest, at the 35th percentile.

That’s higher than 35 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Coachella Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in Coachella Valley Unified had 38 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Coachella Valley Unified score highest?

NOVA Academy - Coachella is highest, at the 51st percentile.

That’s higher than 51 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Coachella Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 1 high school
Context

The average high school in Coachella Valley Unified had 44 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

1 high school not ranked statewide

The district

Where does Coachella Valley Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Coachella Valley Unified spent $25,961 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Coachella Valley Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction64%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services11%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$129.2 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 25 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 36% of its $361.5 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 383 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

College and Career Readiness Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - High School & Middle CTE Teacher Salaries (28) - College/​Career PUENTE Counselors - Coordinator of CTE - Coordinator of Secondary Counselors; Supplemental Supports to Strengthen the Instructional Core; and Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Per Diem/​Extra Services take 24% of the money. The plan itself puts 69% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

1 of the plan’s 25 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help
  • Catch-up help $710,691

Largest of these

  • Academic Intervention and Enrichment Program (AIEP)$710,691
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $75.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $77.4 million and estimates it spent $74.6 million, $2.8 million (4%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $579,836 lower than in the 2025–26 plan. We couldn’t match $93.6 million of this $129.2 million plan to individual actions in last year’s plan. These lists cover the rest.

Largest cuts

  • Mental Health Services−⁠$2.1 million
  • Multilingual & Multicultural Education−⁠$1.1 million

Largest increases

  • Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Contracts+⁠$2.3 million
  • Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Per Diem/​Extra Services+⁠$1.5 million
  • Supplemental Supports to Strengthen the Instructional Core+⁠$983,354

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • College and Career Readiness Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - High School & Middle CTE Teacher Salaries (28) - College/​Career PUENTE Counselors - Coordinator of CTE - Coordinator of Secondary Counselors$11.9 million
  • Health Services Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include:$4.0 million
  • Technology Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - IT Services Technicians (5) - Data, Accountability, and Assessment Coordinator$2.6 million

Ask: What did Mental Health Services pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $2.1 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 130%32%up 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 120%20%no change
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 236 in 10038 in 1002 more in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 23.2%3.1%down 0.1 pts

Goal 5 tracks named schools and Goals 3 and 4 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • College and Career Readiness Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - High School & Middle CTE Teacher Salaries (28) - College/​Career PUENTE Counselors - Coordinator of CTE - Coordinator of Secondary Counselors · $11,898,942
  • Supplemental Supports to Strengthen the Instructional Core · $9,744,063
  • Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Per Diem/​Extra Services · $9,375,985
The full plan5 goals, 80 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($129.2 million).

Where does the money go?

66% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Create equitable access to educational opportunities that will lead to academic success$85.4 million66% of action budgets

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $85.1 million (+⁠$343,310) · p. 75 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. College and Career Readiness Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - High School & Middle CTE Teacher Salaries (28) - College/​Career PUENTE Counselors - Coordinator of CTE - Coordinator of Secondary Counselors$11.9 millionaction 1.5 · p. 324 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $8.3 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Supplemental Supports to Strengthen the Instructional Core$9.7 millionaction 1.2 · p. 323 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $9.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Title 1- Site Allocations LCFF S/​C-Site Allocations State and Federal Accountability Support$3.1 millionaction 1.7 · p. 325 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.7 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Multilingual & Multicultural Education$2.8 millionaction 1.6 · p. 324 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $986,841 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Technology Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - IT Services Technicians (5) - Data, Accountability, and Assessment Coordinator$2.6 millionaction 1.8 · p. 325 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Implementation of Multi-tiered System of Instructional Supports · action 1.1 · p. 323 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.3 million

3 more actions are in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 323 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Multilingual & Multicultural Education−⁠$1.1 million$3.8 million → $2.8 million · p. 324 ↗
  2. Supplemental Supports to Strengthen the Instructional Core+⁠$1.0 million$8.8 million → $9.7 million · p. 323 ↗
  3. Implementation of Multi-tiered System of Instructional Supports−⁠$0.2 million$2.4 million → $2.3 million · p. 323 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Title not confirmed · $30.2 million · p. 323 ↗not compared
  • Title not confirmed · $14.8 million · p. 323 ↗not compared
  • College and Career Readiness Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - High School & Middle CTE Teacher Salaries (28) - College/​Career PUENTE Counselors - Coordinator of CTE - Coordinator of Secondary Counselors · $11.9 million · p. 324 ↗new or renamed
  • Title not confirmed · $8.0 million · p. 325 ↗not compared
  • Title 1- Site Allocations LCFF S/​C-Site Allocations State and Federal Accountability Support · $3.2 million → $3.1 million · p. 325 ↗−⁠$39,609
  • Technology Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - IT Services Technicians (5) - Data, Accountability, and Assessment Coordinator · $2.6 million · p. 325 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 31 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 75 ↗.

Goal 2Provide equitable access to health and wellness to ensure social emotional and academic success$27.7 million21% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $31.7 million (−⁠$4.1 million) · p. 162 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Health Services Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include:$4.0 millionaction 2.7 · p. 327 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Mental Health Services$2.3 millionaction 2.6 · p. 327 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Homeless/ Foster Youth Support$0.1 millionaction 2.5 · p. 327 ↗

4 more actions are in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 325 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Mental Health Services−⁠$2.1 million$4.4 million → $2.3 million · p. 327 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Title not confirmed · $18.1 million · p. 325 ↗not compared
  • Health Services Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: · $4.0 million · p. 327 ↗new or renamed
  • Title not confirmed · $1.5 million · p. 326 ↗not compared
  • Title not confirmed · $1.1 million · p. 326 ↗not compared
  • Title not confirmed · $615,759 · p. 325 ↗not compared
  • Homeless/ Foster Youth Support · $70,099 · p. 327 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 12 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 162 ↗.

Goal 3Strengthen parent and community partnerships through effective communication for student success$1.3 million1% of action budgets

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.5 million (−⁠$1.1 million) · p. 208 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Community Engagement Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - Community Engagement Manager - Parent Community Liaisons (22)$747,618action 3.3 · p. 328 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $279,999 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Communication to Educational Partners Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: • Translator Salaries (2)$444,031action 3.2 · p. 327 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Parent Engagement$120,038action 3.1 · p. 327 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Parent Engagement+⁠$43,581$76,457 → $120,038 · p. 327 ↗
  2. Communication to Educational Partners Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: • Translator Salaries (2)−⁠$30,929$474,960 → $444,031 · p. 327 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Community Engagement Staff supported with LCFF S/​C funds in this action include: - Community Engagement Manager - Parent Community Liaisons (22) · $747,618 · p. 328 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 208 ↗.

Goal 4Provide professional learning to build the capacity of all staff to enhance learning$14.1 million11% of action budgets

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $10.2 million (+⁠$3.9 million) · p. 223 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Per Diem/​Extra Services$9.4 millionaction 4.1 · p. 328 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $8.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Contracts$3.2 millionaction 4.2 · p. 328 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning Salaries$0.8 millionaction 4.5 · p. 328 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $287,494 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Substitutes$0.6 millionaction 4.4 · p. 328 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $333,952 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Conferences$0.1 millionaction 4.3 · p. 328 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Contracts+⁠$2.3 million$0.9 million → $3.2 million · p. 328 ↗
  2. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Per Diem/​Extra Services+⁠$1.5 million$7.9 million → $9.4 million · p. 328 ↗
  3. Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Substitutes+⁠$461,829$165,356 → $627,185 · p. 328 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning Salaries · $1.1 million → $0.8 million · p. 328 ↗−⁠$0.3 million
  • Implementation of Multi-Tiered System of Support - Professional Learning - Conferences · $145,156 → $85,300 · p. 328 ↗−⁠$59,856

How the plan measures it · 18 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 223 ↗.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalLa Familia Continuation High School will improve student outcomes as reported on the California School…$710,6911% of action budgets

“La Familia Continuation High School will improve student outcomes as reported on the California School Dashboard utilizing a multi-tiered system of supports. This focused improvement will include: • The graduation rate will increase by 5% annually for all students, including Socioeconomically Disadvantaged (SED), English Learner, Long Term English Learner (LTELs) and Hispanic students. • College and Career Readiness will improve by a minimum of 2% annually as measured by the CCI for all students, including EL and LTEL students. • The suspension rate will improve by a minimum of 2% annually for all students, including SED, EL, LTEL, and Hispanic students. • The ELPI for EL and LTELS will improve by 5% annually for ELs and LTELs. Based on the most recent TAMO (Teacher Assignment Monitoring Outcomes) Data, from 2023-24, 84.1% of La Familia High School's teachers held a clear credential, 9.5% of teachers were working out-of-field (in a subject area different from the credential they held), and 6.4% of teachers were considered ineffective. In numbers of FTE (Full Time Equivalent) positions, 13.2 FTEs held a clear credential, 1.5 FTEs was working out-of-field, and 1.0 FTE was considered ineffective. To address staffing challenges and promote equitable access to quality education, the district will implement targeted support strategies for teachers working without credentials or out-of-credential area at La Familia High School, which has a high concentration of low-income students. These efforts are designed to improve teacher effectiveness, reduce turnover, and ensure that all students receive high-quality instruction. Key actions will include: • Targeted Professional Development • Mentorship and Coaching: instructional coaching to provide real-time feedback and lesson modeling • Induction Support: to address the needs of non-credentialed teachers, support will be provided to strengthen instructional readiness” p. 253 ↗

1 funded action · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Academic Intervention and Enrichment Program (AIEP)$710,691action 5.1 · p. 328 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Academic Intervention and Enrichment Program (AIEP)+⁠$379,206$331,485 → $710,691 · p. 328 ↗

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 253 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 16,052 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 98%2. White: <1%3. Not reported: <1%4. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%5. Black or African American: <1%6. Two or more races: <1%7. Asian: <1%8. Filipino: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino98%
  2. White<1%
  3. Not reported<1%
  4. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  5. Black or African American<1%
  6. Two or more races<1%
  7. Asian<1%
  8. Filipino<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

93%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 14,890 of 16,052 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Coachella Valley Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 46% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (2,327 of 5,109 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

3 schools getting state support, 2025–26

La Familia Continuation High (Most intensive support, graduation rate) · Sea View Elementary (Extra targeted support) · West Shores High (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (4)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Coachella Valley Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Cesar Chavez Elementary, 44th percentile (Developing). Middle: Cahuilla Desert Academy Junior High, 35th percentile (Developing). High: NOVA Academy - Coachella, 51st percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Coachella Valley Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Coachella Valley Unified good?

Coachella Valley Unified’s 15 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 44th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Developing and 11 Needs Support. Coachella Valley Unified’s 3 public middle schools run from the 4th to the 35th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 2 Needs Support. Coachella Valley Unified’s 4 public high schools run from the 14th to the 51st percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 1 Developing and 2 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Coachella Valley Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Coachella Valley Unified had 32 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Coachella Valley Unified had 38 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Coachella Valley Unified had 44 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Coachella Valley Unified spend per student?

Coachella Valley Unified spent $25,961 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Coachella Valley Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Coachella Valley Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $129.2 million into 25 funded actions in 5 goals, 36% of its $361.5 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $85.4 million, 66% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Coachella Valley Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.