Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne posts 73% meeting the standard, and 40.5% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 53 | 40% | 73% | -42.9 | 14.8% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 73rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.
Most rating sites would stop at “73% proficient” and call it done. Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne deserves a closer read. It sits at the 73rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne's low-income kids hit 68.6% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 41st to the 73rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 73% of students meet the standard today, above the 55% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 76% | 71% | 71% | 72% | 95% |
| Grade 4 | 38% | 68% | 69% | 63% | 74% |
| Grade 5 | 59% | 70% | 47% | 67% | 65% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 71% | 67% | 65% | 72% | 90% |
| Grade 4 | 50% | 53% | 75% | 56% | 79% |
| Grade 5 | 36% | 50% | 37% | 33% | 35% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 31.7pp across grades; the floor slips 30.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne's most underrated number
68.6% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne in Los Angeles, 68.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne outperforms its district average for low-income students by 27.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (60.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (67.6% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 35 students tested.
6 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 40.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$2,079 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 37% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne a good elementary school?
What are Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne's CAASPP test scores?
How does Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne rank in California?
Is Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne?
How does Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 75
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 21 | 67% | 29% | 5% | 0% | 95% | +52 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 42% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 74% | +29 |
| Grade 5 | 20 | 35% | 30% | 25% | 10% | 65% | +17 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 21 | 52% | 38% | 10% | 0% | 90% | +45 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 32% | 47% | 16% | 5% | 79% | +37 |
| Grade 5 | 20 | 15% | 20% | 25% | 40% | 35% | −0 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 19 | 16% | 21% | 42% | 21% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 35 | 68.6% | +28 | +30 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 37 | 67.6% | +27 | +29 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magne ← | — | 53 | 40.5% | 73.1% | −42.9 | 0.3% |
| Franklin Avenue Elementary | 1.9 mi | 76 | 56.5% | 81.7% | −8.1 | 0.1% |
| Renaissance Arts Academy | 1.6 mi | 76 | 59.6% | 86.5% | −0.9 | 0.2% |
| Ivanhoe Elementary | 1.5 mi | 72 | 48.7% | 80.2% | −8.2 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 39 | 41 | #3235 | 31.9% | 55.1% | 16.1% | 0.7% | -26.1pp |
| 2022 | 51 | 78 | #1251 | 35.4% | 63.2% | 35.6% | 0.1% | -9.1pp |
| 2023 | 45 | 64 | #2084 | 36.3% | 60.5% | 21.5% | 0.1% | -25.5pp |
| 2024 | 49 | 67 | #1901 | 38.3% | 60.5% | 20.1% | 0.9% | -22.2pp |
| 2025 | 53 | 73 | #1560 | 40.5% | 73.1% | 14.8% | 0.3% | -42.9pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 13.6% | 14.1% | +0.5pp |
| Male | 18.8% | 13.9% | -4.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 18.9% | 16.0% | -2.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 25.0% | 26.7% | +1.7pp |
| English Learners | 17.6% | 36.4% | +18.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 21.0% | 17.1% | -3.9pp |
| All Students | 16.4% | 14.0% | -2.4pp |
| Filipino | — | 15.4% | — |
| Two or More Races | — | 9.1% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction