ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Challenger School of Sports and Fitness · Victorville

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness posts 36% meeting the standard and 14.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

14777 Hopland Street, 92394 (opens in new tab)·Victor Elementary·Victorville·Grades TK-6·843 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 843-6866·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded15%21%
% Met+36%43%
Growth-9.3-2.9
Absence24.9%17.9%
Suspension4.1%1.6%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,654 statewide · #7 of 18 in Victor Elementary

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 36th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Challenger School of Sports and Fitness deserves a closer read. The school sits in Victorville, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 25.3% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 22nd to the 36th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 36% of students meet the standard today, above the 22% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 318%28%33%22%40%
Grade 422%31%38%34%38%
Grade 536%21%48%33%34%
Grade 640%38%30%44%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 324%27%34%21%42%
Grade 417%19%29%33%32%
Grade 515%12%22%17%29%
Grade 629%23%23%33%31%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
24%
60%
Grade 3 · 40% proficient
19%
19%
62%
Grade 4 · 38% proficient
10%
24%
66%
Grade 5 · 34% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.6pp across grades; the floor slips 5.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.5%
State 21.3%
6.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
35.7%
State 42.7%
7.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
24.9%
State 17.9%
7.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.1%
State 1.6%
2.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.2%
State 18.0%
11.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.

How every group of students does here

At Challenger School of Sports and Fitness in Victorville, 36.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Challenger School of Sports and Fitness outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 431 students tested.

All students at this school: 36% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 36%, district —, state 43%36%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 24%, state 32%34% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 38%, district 28%, state 32%38% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 38%, district 28%, state 42%38% · +2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 33%, district 27%, state 44%33% · −3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 25%, district 13%, state 11%25% · −11 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 20%, district 14%, state 26%20% · −16 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 7%, state 15%7% · −29 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 50%, district 41%, state 56%50% · +14 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 5.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +1.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 24.9%, district 27.8%, state 17.9%24.9% · +7.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.1%, district —, state 1.6%4.1% · +2.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–623.6%
TK/K31.0%

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 24:123:1
Teaching staff38 teachers
Avg. experience13.4 years
Fully credentialed94%
First-year teachers8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,210 – $148,547
Principal salary$177,765 – $0
Superintendent salary$264,138

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,621, CA average $14,815$19,621 · spent at this school
Federal share$271 per student

$271 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,230 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,284 per pupil
2019$12,384 per pupil
2018$11,626 per pupil
2017$11,138 per pupil
2016$10,528 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic73.0%
District 68.8% · CA 56.1%
Black15.4%
District 15.9% · CA 4.8%
White6.8%
District 9.0% · CA 19.9%
Other4.7%
District 5.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.1%
District 1.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.3% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$78K · CA $85K
Median home value$385K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population41,614
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 843 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Challenger School of Sports and Fitness a good elementary school?

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 36th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,654 statewide. 14.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Challenger School of Sports and Fitness's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.7% of students at Challenger School of Sports and Fitness met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 718 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Challenger School of Sports and Fitness rank in California?

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness ranks #3,654 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 36th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Challenger School of Sports and Fitness getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Challenger School of Sports and Fitness decreases by 9.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Challenger School of Sports and Fitness?

24.9% of students at Challenger School of Sports and Fitness are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Challenger School of Sports and Fitness compare to other schools in Victorville?

Challenger School of Sports and Fitness scores 38/100 (36th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 843 students. Use the schools in Victorville page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Challenger School of Sports and Fitness serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Challenger School of Sports and Fitness in Victorville, 36.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Challenger School of Sports and Fitness outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 431 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 43th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-9.3pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 52th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
35.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
24.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 39th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 30th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 34th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310616%24%25%36%40%−4
Grade 412819%19%18%45%38%−7
Grade 512510%24%27%38%34%−13
Grade 611914%30%31%24%45%−2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310519%23%26%32%42%−4
Grade 41289%23%29%39%32%−10
Grade 512613%15%28%44%29%−7
Grade 612013%18%27%43%31%−4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111262%22%55%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged43136.4%+8−2
Hispanic/Latino34640.8%+8+2
English Learners9925.3%+11+15
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Challenger School of Sports and Fitness ←3814.5%35.7%−9.34.1%
Gus Franklin Jr.0.4 mi5017.1%44.6%+6.13.1%
Dr. Ralph H. Baker 21st Century Learning Center0.6 mi388.3%21.4%+12.56.0%
West Palms Conservatory2.4 mi2612.7%32.4%−9.94.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193222#43108.2%22.1%14.2%6.1%+4.9pp
2022185#54357.5%22.9%36.6%3.4%-10.4pp
20233745#313812.2%33.7%33.8%4.4%+1.7pp
20243018#470510.3%26.7%26.7%4.4%+3.3pp
20253836#365414.5%35.7%24.9%4.1%-9.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.2%24.7%+10.5pp
Male14.2%25.7%+11.5pp
Asian0.0%
Black/African American15.9%37.8%+21.9pp
Hispanic/Latino14.0%21.4%+7.4pp
Two or More Races20.0%37.1%+17.1pp
Students with Disabilities14.6%31.3%+16.7pp
English Learners9.2%16.2%+7.0pp
Foster Youth15.8%28.6%+12.8pp
Homeless29.6%30.3%+0.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.7%26.9%+12.2pp
All Students14.2%25.2%+11.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction