Cedar Grove Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
Cedar Grove posts 48% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 52 | 26% | 48% | +6.7 | 10.6% | 1.4% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Cedar Grove Elementary scores 52 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 71st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “48% proficient” and call it done. Cedar Grove deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 71st percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 48% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 46% | 56% | 41% | 48% | 38% |
| Grade 4 | 54% | 54% | 51% | 52% | 53% |
| Grade 5 | 63% | 45% | 45% | 57% | 61% |
| Grade 6 | 49% | 43% | 46% | 55% | 58% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42% | 60% | 46% | 58% | 50% |
| Grade 4 | 46% | 42% | 50% | 49% | 49% |
| Grade 5 | 47% | 31% | 40% | 39% | 40% |
| Grade 6 | 42% | 24% | 43% | 40% | 52% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 11.3pp across grades; the floor rises 23.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Cedar Grove Elementary in San Jose, 42.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Cedar Grove Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.3% Math proficient); Asian students (70.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.1 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 158 students tested.
7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 26.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +11.1pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly three times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (17.0% vs 5.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$157 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cedar Grove Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Cedar Grove Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Cedar Grove Elementary rank in California?
Is Cedar Grove Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Cedar Grove Elementary?
How does Cedar Grove Elementary compare to other schools in San Jose?
How does Cedar Grove Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 76
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 35
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 58 | 17% | 21% | 28% | 34% | 38% | −5 |
| Grade 4 | 59 | 34% | 19% | 24% | 24% | 53% | +8 |
| Grade 5 | 77 | 29% | 32% | 19% | 19% | 61% | +13 |
| Grade 6 | 93 | 29% | 29% | 26% | 16% | 58% | +12 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 58 | 22% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 50% | +4 |
| Grade 4 | 59 | 29% | 20% | 29% | 22% | 49% | +8 |
| Grade 5 | 77 | 22% | 18% | 30% | 30% | 40% | +5 |
| Grade 6 | 92 | 36% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 52% | +17 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 77 | 10% | 22% | 55% | 13% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 158 | 42.4% | −1 | +4 |
| Asian | 122 | 70.5% | −10 | −4 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 95 | 34.7% | +2 | −4 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Grove Elementary ← | — | 52 | 25.5% | 48.5% | +6.7 | 1.4% |
| Millbrook Elementary | 0.9 mi | 77 | 45.3% | 69.3% | +14.8 | 0.3% |
| Tom Matsumoto Elementary | 2.1 mi | 76 | 61.0% | 78.2% | −5.0 | 0.2% |
| Evergreen Elementary | 1.7 mi | 76 | 61.2% | 82.0% | +2.5 | 0.6% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 51 | 68 | #1765 | 19.1% | 49.5% | 7.7% | 0.5% | +11.0pp |
| 2022 | 37 | 52 | #2763 | 25.8% | 48.2% | 17.0% | 0.5% | -20.2pp |
| 2023 | 46 | 66 | #1923 | 22.9% | 45.5% | 23.0% | 1.2% | -1.0pp |
| 2024 | 49 | 66 | #1935 | 26.4% | 50.8% | 12.3% | 0.3% | -5.0pp |
| 2025 | 52 | 71 | #1639 | 25.5% | 48.5% | 10.6% | 1.4% | +6.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10.3% | 9.9% | -0.4pp |
| Male | 5.7% | 10.0% | +4.3pp |
| Asian | 5.0% | 4.2% | -0.8pp |
| Black/African American | 0.0% | — | — |
| White | 4.8% | 5.0% | +0.2pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.8% | 17.3% | +2.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 4.5% | 8.8% | +4.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 6.3% | 17.2% | +10.9pp |
| English Learners | 9.2% | 5.4% | -3.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.1% | 12.4% | +2.3pp |
| All Students | 7.7% | 10.0% | +2.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction