Camino Pablo Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Camino Pablo posts 47.5% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 80 | 48% | 76% | +1.7 | 3.1% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Camino Pablo Elementary scores 80 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 98th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “76% proficient” and call it done. Camino Pablo deserves a closer read. It sits at the 98th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: +1.7pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 98th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 76% meet the standard today, versus 80% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 72% | 73% | 53% | 75% | 75% |
| Grade 4 | 79% | 82% | 80% | 73% | 76% |
| Grade 5 | 88% | 90% | 87% | 80% | 80% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 70% | 69% | 69% | 80% | 77% |
| Grade 4 | 88% | 88% | 78% | 78% | 75% |
| Grade 5 | 81% | 88% | 75% | 69% | 75% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.1pp across grades; the floor rises 5.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Camino Pablo Elementary in Moraga, 69.0% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 78.7% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Camino Pablo Elementary trails its district average for white students by 9.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (69.0% Math proficient); Two or More Races students (85.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.0 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 71 students tested.
5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 75% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Camino Pablo Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Camino Pablo Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Camino Pablo Elementary rank in California?
Is Camino Pablo Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Camino Pablo Elementary?
How does Camino Pablo Elementary compare to other schools in Moraga?
How does Camino Pablo Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 74
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 74
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 60 | 43% | 32% | 22% | 3% | 75% | +32 |
| Grade 4 | 41 | 51% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 76% | +31 |
| Grade 5 | 56 | 46% | 34% | 13% | 7% | 80% | +32 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 61 | 44% | 33% | 13% | 10% | 77% | +31 |
| Grade 4 | 40 | 50% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 75% | +33 |
| Grade 5 | 56 | 50% | 25% | 16% | 9% | 75% | +40 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 56 | 41% | 34% | 25% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 71 | 69.0% | −10 | +7 |
| Two or More Races | 42 | 85.7% | −0 | +24 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camino Pablo Elementary ← | — | 80 | 47.5% | 76.3% | +1.7 | 0.1% |
| Donald L. Rheem Elementary | 2.4 mi | 74 | 57.4% | 83.2% | −9.6 | 0.1% |
| Del Rey Elementary | 2.3 mi | 74 | 58.8% | 86.4% | −3.0 | 0.3% |
| Los Perales Elementary | 1.9 mi | 73 | 43.7% | 75.3% | +11.3 | 0.6% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 86 | 99 | #56 | 53.7% | 79.5% | 2.6% | 0.0% | +13.2pp |
| 2022 | 86 | 99 | #29 | 54.1% | 81.5% | 2.2% | 0.6% | +17.9pp |
| 2023 | 86 | 99 | #51 | 52.6% | 73.6% | 5.2% | 0.6% | +19.9pp |
| 2024 | 77 | 96 | #218 | 47.3% | 75.9% | 3.6% | 0.1% | -3.2pp |
| 2025 | 80 | 98 | #136 | 47.5% | 76.3% | 3.1% | 0.1% | +1.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2.1% | 1.8% | -0.3pp |
| Male | 2.7% | 1.7% | -1.0pp |
| Asian | 2.3% | 2.3% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 0.0% | 2.6% | +2.6pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 1.4% | +1.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 3.8% | 2.0% | -1.8pp |
| English Learners | 6.3% | — | — |
| All Students | 2.4% | 1.7% | -0.7pp |
| Filipino | — | 7.7% | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | — | 0.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction