Public school · Cupertino Union

Blue Hills Elementary

Saratoga · TK–5 · 424 students (2024–25)

99thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,721 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

82 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Blue Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Blue Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Blue Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well above California in English and math: 79% and 88% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 215 in English, 212 in math
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Get an email when Blue Hills Elementary’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 62%
Met standard: 17%
Below standard: 21%

79% met or exceeded · 215 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Cupertino Union
Exceeded	62%	24%	57%
Met	17%	22%	22%
Nearly met	12%	21%	11%
Not met	9%	33%	10%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 65%
Met standard: 23%
Below standard: 12%

88% met or exceeded · 212 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Cupertino Union
Exceeded	65%	21%	63%
Met	23%	20%	20%
Nearly met	6%	25%	11%
Not met	6%	34%	6%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence

About 2 in 3 reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2025

62%English · exceeded the standard65%Math · exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 215 in English, 212 in math
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

31 of 450 students missed 10% or more of school days, close to the average Cupertino Union school.2024–25

7 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

Source: CDE chronic absenteeism file, 2024–25
Students: all students counted for chronic absence (CDE’s eligible enrollment): 450
Comparison: 31 of 450. District and California figures are averages of school rates (18 Cupertino Union schools; 5,721 scored California elementary schools), our calculation.

English learners here (34 tested in English, 33 in math, grades 3 and 5, spring 2025) met or exceeded the standard far more often than English learners across California in the same grades (13% and 16%).grades 3 and 5 · spring 2025

59%English · met or exceeded76%Math · met or exceeded

Source: CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2025
Students: English learners in grades 3 and 5: 34 in English, 33 in math
Comparison: California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 34 students in English and 33 in math.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school79%

California46%

Tested: 215 here · 1,232,086 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school79%

Cupertino Union79%

Tested: 215 here · 4,217 in Cupertino Union. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 18 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Cupertino Union
Exceeded	62%	24%	57%
Met	17%	22%	22%
Nearly met	12%	21%	11%
Not met	9%	33%	10%

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school88%

California41%

Tested: 212 here · 1,241,652 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school88%

Cupertino Union83%

Tested: 212 here · 4,315 in Cupertino Union. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 18 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Cupertino Union
Exceeded	65%	21%	63%
Met	23%	20%	20%
Nearly met	6%	25%	11%
Not met	6%	34%	6%

Progress over time

Are students making progress?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201987%173 tested

→

202579%215 tested

Blue Hills

California, same grades50% → 46%2019 → 2025 · 1,332,547 → 1,232,086 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201989%178 tested

→

202588%212 tested

Blue Hills

California, same grades44% → 41%2019 → 2025 · 1,338,625 → 1,241,652 tested

A comparison of two years, not individual student growth. Each year is a different group of students.

Explore every year, the trend charts & underlying data

English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2019.

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5

Blue HillsCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)79%46%

Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5

Blue HillsCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)88%41%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results; in 2020 and 2021 that was COVID.

English went from 87% in 2019 to 79% in 2025. Math went from 89% in 2019 to 88% in 2025. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	Blue Hills	California
2019	87% 173 tested	50% 1,332,547 tested
2022	89% 130 tested	45% 1,260,830 tested
2023	82% 188 tested	44% 1,247,801 tested
2024	82% 212 tested	45% 1,235,509 tested
2025	79% 215 tested	46% 1,232,086 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	Blue Hills	California
2019	89% 178 tested	44% 1,338,625 tested
2022	93% 131 tested	38% 1,265,943 tested
2023	90% 190 tested	40% 1,256,519 tested
2024	85% 217 tested	41% 1,249,262 tested
2025	88% 212 tested	41% 1,241,652 tested

The state’s growth measure126 students in English, 123 in math · grades 4–5 · 2025

English0ptsCDE level: Average (3 of 5)

Math+9ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored right at that prediction, and in math 9 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.

School pattern, spring 2025High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.

School pattern, spring 2025Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.

School pattern, spring 2025Strong All-AroundAt least half of students met or exceeded the standard in every tested grade, in both subjects, and the state’s growth measure was Average or above in both.

Ask: English is lower than in 2019 here (87% to 79%) and across California (50% to 46%). How does the school check what’s working in English?

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

7 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

6in 100 at the average Cupertino Union school18in 100 at the average California elementary school

31 of 450 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school7 in 100

at the average Cupertino Union school6 in 100

at the average California elementary school18 in 100

0.7%of students were suspended at least once (3 of 458), 2024–25

0.7%at the average Cupertino Union school1.6%at the average California elementary school

Attendance by grade

Chronically absent, 2024–25	Per 100 students	Students
TK and kindergarten	11	11 of 99
Grades 1–3	5	10 of 201
Grades 4–5	7	10 of 150

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Asian

165 English · 162 math tested

English83% / 71%

Math92% / 71%

English learners

34 English · 33 math tested · grades 3 and 5

English59% / 13%

Math76% / 16%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrades 3–5 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Cupertino Union	vs California
Asian · 165 tested in English, 162 in math
English	83%	−285%	+1271%
Math	92%	+290%	+2171%
English learners · 34 tested in English, 33 in math · grades 3 and 5 only
English	59%	+1742%	+4613%
Math	76%	+1858%	+6016%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Cupertino Union, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Low-income and White students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

English learners here did far better than the same group statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Blue Hills Elementary in Saratoga, 55.6% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3 and 4, compared to 55.3% district-wide for those same grades and 33.9% statewide for those same grades. Blue Hills Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (55.6% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (83.0% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 29.1 percentage points: English learners in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 27 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

Asian73%
White11%
Not reported5%
Two or more races5%
Hispanic or Latino4%
Black or African American—
Filipino—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Unallocated share2%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
Asian	73%
White	11%
Not reported	5%
Two or more races	5%
Hispanic or Latino	4%
Black or African American	—
Filipino	—
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

1 in 6 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (16%, 69 of 424). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers22

Average experience18 years

First-year teachers0%

100% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 100.00%: 11.6 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 11.6 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

ElementaryBlue Hills ElementaryThis campus · grades K-5
MiddleLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
High schoolLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

Christa McAuliffe
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Ask Cupertino Union which school serves your address.

bluehills.cusdk8.org

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

12300 De Sanka Avenue, Saratoga 95070

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

English is lower than in 2019 here (87% to 79%) and across California (50% to 46%). How does the school check what’s working in English?
How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (408) 257-9282 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

John Muir Elementary0.8 mi99thStrong
Christa McAuliffe0.9 mi94thStrong
Argonaut Elementary0.9 mi98thStrong

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2025 statewide percentile

Phoebe Apperson Hearst ElementaryPleasanton Unified · 467 enrolled · 16.3% meal eligibility83rdStrong
Jerabek ElementarySan Diego Unified · 718 enrolled · 16.3% meal eligibility92ndStrong
Rancho Las Positas ElementaryLivermore Valley Joint Unified · 586 enrolled · 16.2% meal eligibility77thStrong
Austin Creek ElementaryRincon Valley Union Elementary · 366 enrolled · 16.4% meal eligibility84thStrong
Bethany ElementaryLammersville Joint Unified · 768 enrolled · 16.1% meal eligibility89thStrong
Top of the World ElementaryLaguna Beach Unified · 536 enrolled · 16.4% meal eligibility94thStrong

How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 8.3–24.3% meal eligibility and 212–848 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Blue Hills Elementary a good elementary school?

Blue Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 82 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Blue Hills Elementary was well above California in English and math: 79% and 88% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Blue Hills Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 79% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 88% the math standard; 62% and 65% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 215 students were tested in English and 212 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Blue Hills Elementary rank in California?

Blue Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2025). Blue Hills Elementary ranks #55 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Blue Hills Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope compares Blue Hills Elementary's grade 3 results in 2023 with its grade 5 results in 2025, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 92nd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Blue Hills Elementary?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 6.9% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 31 chronically absent of 450 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.7%; 3 unduplicated suspended students of 458 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 7.6%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.8%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Blue Hills Elementary compare to other schools in Saratoga?

Blue Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 424 students. Use the schools in Saratoga page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Blue Hills Elementary?

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Blue Hills Elementary is ranked #55 statewide · #5 of 18 in Cupertino Union.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	63.5%	21.4%	42%
Met or exceeded	83.4%	42.7%	23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)	Strong	average	20%
Chronic absenteeism	7.6%	17.9%	5%
Suspension rate	0.8%	1.6%	5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)	41.2%	17.8%	5%

Exceeded standard: ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 91 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 81 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): ↑ vs CA average · ≈92nd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism: ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 67 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 2.2pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 57 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.7pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC): ↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 83 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	72	58%	17%	13%	13%	75%	+32
Grade 4	72	63%	15%	15%	7%	78%	+33
Grade 5	71	66%	18%	8%	7%	85%	+37

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	72	67%	21%	3%	10%	88%	+42
Grade 4	71	61%	24%	11%	4%	85%	+43
Grade 5	69	67%	25%	6%	3%	91%	+56

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA	73	80.8%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA	65	73.8%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA	74	90.5%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math	73	90.4%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math	69	75.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	75	88.0%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA	62	72.6%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA	69	91.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA	57	80.7%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math	63	84.1%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math	70	97.1%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	57	87.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA	47	85.1%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA	40	92.5%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA	43	90.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math	48	93.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math	40	95.0%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	43	90.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA	53	86.8%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA	59	84.8%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA	61	90.2%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math	53	84.9%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math	60	88.3%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	65	92.3%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	71	42%	27%	24%	7%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	27	55.6%	+0	+22
Asian	165	83.0%	−2	+12
English Learners	34	58.8%	+17	+45

Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Blue Hills Elementary ←	—	8299th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	63.5%	83.4%	+6.7pp	+87 pts	0.8%
John Muir Elementary	0.8 mi	8899th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	69.8%	92.1%	−3.1pp	—	0.5%
Christa McAuliffe	0.9 mi	7294th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	56.7%	81.8%	+1.7pp	—	1.9%
Argonaut Elementary	0.9 mi	8198th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	66.7%	89.0%	+1.5pp	—	0.1%
California average	—	39School average · no percentile	21.4%	42.7%	−2.9pp	—	1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records

Teacher salary schedule$79,336 – $150,441

Average elementary principal salary$204,549

Average middle school principal salary$215,473

Superintendent salary$385,579

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	90/100	99	#35	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
2022	93/100	99	#28	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
2023	87/100	98	#72	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
2024	78/100	97	#137	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 4.4% → 2025 · 6.9% · +2.5pp
Suspension rate2024 · 1.4% → 2025 · 0.7% · −0.7pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	215	62.3%	79.1%
2025 · Math	212	64.6%	87.7%
2024 · ELA	212	58.0%	82.1%
2024 · Math	217	65.9%	84.8%
2023 · ELA	188	63.3%	81.9%
2023 · Math	190	67.9%	90.0%
2022 · ELA	130	67.7%	89.2%
2022 · Math	131	73.3%	93.1%
2019 · ELA	173	69.9%	87.3%
2019 · Math	178	73.6%	88.8%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	71.5%	87.9%	4.5%	1.3%	+5.4pp
2022	—	—	—	70.7%	91.3%	11.8%	1.0%	+1.3pp
2023	—	—	—	65.4%	85.6%	12.1%	0.5%	+5.9pp
2024	—	—	—	61.6%	83.2%	5.4%	1.4%	+3.7pp
2025	82	99	#55	63.5%	83.4%	7.6%	0.8%	+6.7pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	3.9%	5.9%	+2.0pp
Male	3.8%	7.8%	+4.0pp
Asian	2.9%	7.0%	+4.1pp
Hispanic/Latino	40.0%	5.6%	-34.4pp
Two or More Races	4.3%	14.3%	+10.0pp
White	2.2%	6.0%	+3.8pp
Students with Disabilities	20.0%	9.3%	-10.7pp
English Learners	4.8%	7.7%	+2.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	22.2%	12.8%	-9.4pp
All Students	3.9%	6.9%	+3.0pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	0	126	Average	+9	123	Accelerated
Asian	−1	95	Average	+13	92	Accelerated
English Only	0	47	not categorised	+9	46	not categorised
English Learner	−9	38	Moderate	+11	37	Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only	−8	21	not categorised	+14	21	not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	−1	20	Average	+6	20	Accelerated
English Learners Only	−5	17	not categorised	+11	16	not categorised
White	+2	14	Average	+5	14	Accelerated

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

ELA · 2023 · Grade 3

60%

exceeded standard · 73% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2023 · 62 ELA test records with scores

ELA · 2025 · Grade 5

66%

exceeded standard · 85% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2025 · 71 ELA test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 63 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

126 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

45th pctile · 0 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

123 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

73rd pctile · +9 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,354 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 15,663 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$38 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 424

Central federal expenditures attributed here$248 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 424

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,567 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 65%Instruction support 12%Student services 7%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 9%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$12,354 per pupil

2020$11,995 per pupil

2019$12,291 per pupil

2018$11,257 per pupil

2017$10,574 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95070

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95070
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$250,001
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	80.88%
ZCTA population	31,417
Median age	51.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/blue-hills-elementary-7185"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Blue Hills Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Blue Hills Elementary

Compare schools

Get an email when Blue Hills Elementary’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

Are children building strong foundations?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

Are students making progress?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

Parent voices

Teacher & staff voices

How each student group did

Asian

English learners

Students and staff

Student mix

The school path beyond this campus

Middle-school links

Ask Cupertino Union which school serves your address.

Location and visiting

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Similar student populations

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful