Apple Blossom: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But math slips between grade 3 and grade 5.
Apple Blossom has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 47 | 20% | 46% | -5.7 | 17.3% | 1.6% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Apple Blossom scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “46% proficient” and call it done. Apple Blossom deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sebastopol, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 50.0% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 61st percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 46% meet the standard today, versus 50% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57% | 40% | 55% | 38% | 51% |
| Grade 4 | 66% | 48% | 24% | 45% | 39% |
| Grade 5 | 53% | 63% | 71% | 57% | 52% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 37% | 35% | 50% | 50% | 51% |
| Grade 4 | 50% | 34% | 38% | 41% | 44% |
| Grade 5 | 40% | 40% | 42% | 38% | 39% |
The story this school is actually telling
of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
math proficiency runs 51% in grade 3 against 39% in grade 5, while reading holds (51% to 52%). The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.6pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Apple Blossom in Sebastopol, 31.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Apple Blossom trails its district average for low-income students by 21.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.2% Math proficient); White students (55.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.0 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 48 students tested.
5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -0.4pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (27.4% vs 12.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$640 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 45% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Apple Blossom a good elementary school?
What are Apple Blossom's CAASPP test scores?
How does Apple Blossom rank in California?
Is Apple Blossom getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Apple Blossom?
How does Apple Blossom compare to other schools in Sebastopol?
How does Apple Blossom serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 49
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 52
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 45 | 29% | 22% | 33% | 16% | 51% | +8 |
| Grade 4 | 36 | 22% | 17% | 36% | 25% | 39% | −6 |
| Grade 5 | 66 | 27% | 24% | 30% | 18% | 52% | +4 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 45 | 11% | 40% | 31% | 18% | 51% | +5 |
| Grade 4 | 36 | 8% | 36% | 47% | 8% | 44% | +3 |
| Grade 5 | 66 | 21% | 18% | 36% | 24% | 39% | +4 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 65 | 20% | 25% | 51% | 5% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 48 | 31.2% | −21 | −7 |
| White | 105 | 55.2% | −7 | −7 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 28 | 25.0% | −25 | −14 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Blossom ← | — | 47 | 19.8% | 46.1% | −5.7 | 1.6% |
| Sebastopol Independent Charter | 1.7 mi | 52 | 22.7% | 47.9% | +28.3 | 0.5% |
| Orchard View | 0 mi | 51 | 23.3% | 48.8% | — | 0.5% |
| Sunridge Charter | 1.5 mi | 45 | 21.2% | 51.9% | +5.4 | 0.6% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 46 | 58 | #2314 | 20.5% | 50.4% | 4.7% | 0.9% | -0.5pp |
| 2022 | 47 | 72 | #1586 | 17.6% | 43.4% | 36.3% | 0.9% | +14.1pp |
| 2023 | 47 | 68 | #1852 | 21.9% | 46.6% | 26.5% | 0.3% | +4.1pp |
| 2024 | 49 | 66 | #1960 | 20.4% | 44.7% | 12.6% | 2.0% | +3.4pp |
| 2025 | 47 | 61 | #2222 | 19.8% | 46.1% | 17.3% | 1.6% | -5.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.6% | 21.9% | +18.3pp |
| Male | 5.6% | 12.2% | +6.6pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 5.9% | 22.4% | +16.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 3.2% | 20.0% | +16.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 9.3% | 13.2% | +3.9pp |
| English Learners | 6.7% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.5% | 25.8% | +15.3pp |
| All Students | 4.5% | 17.2% | +12.7pp |
| Homeless | — | 15.4% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction