School district · Sonoma County

Twin Hills Union Elementary schools

Twin Hills Union Elementary’s 3 public elementary schools run from the 51st to the 72nd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 3 schools

from 51st to 72nd · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Apple Blossom: 72nd percentile, Solid
  • Sunridge Charter: 65th percentile, Solid
  • Orchard View: 51st percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
3Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 3 schools

from 78th to 82nd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Orchard View: 82nd percentile, Strong
  • Sunridge Charter: 79th percentile, Strong
  • Twin Hills Charter Middle: 78th percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
3Strong

High · 1 school

at 50th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Orchard View: 50th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 2 of the 4 ranked schools teach more than one level, 1 of them all three, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 4 ranked schools
  • 3 of 4 are charter schools

Schools around the Twin Hills Union Elementary district

4 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district score highest?

Apple Blossom is highest, at the 72nd percentile.

That’s higher than 72 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average elementary school in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district score highest?

Orchard View is highest, at the 82nd percentile.

That’s higher than 82 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Where does the high school we score in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district stand?

Orchard View is at the 50th percentile.

That’s higher than 50 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). It’s the only public high school we score in Twin Hills Union Elementary.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

  • Orchard ViewCharter school. Check how it admits students.
    50thSolidScope Score 56

The district

Where does Twin Hills Union Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Twin Hills Union Elementary district spent $21,292 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Twin Hills Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction60%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration13%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$3.3 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 8 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s 47% of its $7.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 79 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 82% of the money. The plan itself puts 86% of it toward staff.

  • Implementation of the Standards $2.0 million
  • Students with Disabilities Support $402,781
  • Academic Support $267,829
  • 5 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

1 of the plan’s 8 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help
  • Catch-up help $267,829

Largest of these

  • Academic Support$267,829
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $302,332 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $182,579 and estimates it spent $178,036, $4,543 (2%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $181,836 (6%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. We couldn’t match $3.3 million of this $3.3 million plan to individual actions in last year’s plan. These lists cover the rest.

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Implementation of the Standards$2.0 million
  • Students with Disabilities Support$402,781
  • Academic Support$267,829
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Engagement, Achievement and Support48%62%up 14 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Engagement, Achievement and Support44%50%up 6 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 1 and 217 in 10012 in 1005 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2 · Climate, Culture, and Community1.6%1.0%down 0.6 pts

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Implementation of the Standards · $2,044,234
  • Students with Disabilities Support · $402,781
  • Academic Support · $267,829
The full plan2 goals, 28 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($3.3 million).

Where does the money go?

89% to Goal 1, Engagement, Achievement and Support. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Engagement, Achievement and Support$2.9 million89% of action budgets

“Engage all students with high quality educational opportunities” p. 13 ↗

5 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Implementation of the Standards$2.0 millionaction 1.1 · p. 42 ↗
  2. Students with Disabilities Support$0.4 millionaction 1.4 · p. 42 ↗
  3. Academic Support$0.3 millionaction 1.3 · p. 42 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $193,481 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Student Engagement$0.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 42 ↗
  5. Professional Development/ Collaborative Planningunder $0.1 millionaction 1.2 · p. 42 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Implementation of the Standards · $2.0 million · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Students with Disabilities Support · $402,781 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Academic Support · $267,829 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Student Engagement · $196,324 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Professional Development/ Collaborative Planning · $19,471 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 19 measures · 1 quoted

  • COURSE OF STUDY (Local Data) % of students, including unduplicated and students with exceptional needs have access to the broad course of study p. 17 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 100%
    Target for year 3
    Maintain 100%

18 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Climate, Culture, and Community$362,12511% of action budgets

“Create and sustain a safe, supportive, and respectful environment for students, teachers, staff, and families, while addressing emerging challenges to ensure continuous improvement in school climate and student outcomes” p. 29 ↗

3 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Facilities$173,541action 2.3 · p. 42 ↗
  2. Safety and Connectedness$159,724action 2.1 · p. 42 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $108,851 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Family and Community Engagement$28,860action 2.2 · p. 42 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Facilities · $173,541 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Safety and Connectedness · $159,724 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed
  • Family and Community Engagement · $28,860 · p. 42 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • ATTENDANCE RATE (Local Data) p. 31 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 94%
    Target for year 3
    94%+

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 994 students
1. White: 70%2. Hispanic or Latino: 20%3. Two or more races: 8%4. Asian: <1%5. Black or African American: <1%6. Filipino: <1%7. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%8. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. White70%
  2. Hispanic or Latino20%
  3. Two or more races8%
  4. Asian<1%
  5. Black or African American<1%
  6. Filipino<1%
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  8. Not reported<1%
  9. Pacific Islander0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

26%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 258 of 992 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Twin Hills Union Elementary isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (2)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Apple Blossom, 72nd percentile (Solid). Middle: Orchard View, 82nd percentile (Strong). High: Orchard View, 50th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district good?

Twin Hills Union Elementary’s 3 public elementary schools run from the 51st to the 72nd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Solid. Twin Hills Union Elementary’s 3 public middle schools run from the 78th to the 82nd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Strong. Twin Hills Union Elementary has one public high school we score, Orchard View, at the 50th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Twin Hills Union Elementary district spend per student?

The Twin Hills Union Elementary district spent $21,292 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Twin Hills Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Twin Hills Union Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $3.3 million into 8 funded actions in 2 goals, 47% of its $7.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $2.9 million, 89% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Twin Hills Union Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.