ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Almond Elementary · Fontana

Almond Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Almond posts 27% meeting the standard and 10.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

8172 Almond Avenue, 92335 (opens in new tab)·Fontana Unified·Fontana·Grades TK-6·418 students·85% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 357-5130·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+27%43%
Growth-16.1-2.9
Absence20.7%17.9%
Suspension1.3%1.6%
Scope Score
35
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,087 statewide · #18 of 31 in Fontana Unified

Almond Elementary scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 29th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “27% proficient” and call it done. Almond deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fontana, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 43rd to the 29th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 27% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 323%13%25%24%33%
Grade 433%17%17%28%22%
Grade 539%20%27%18%32%
Grade 641%17%17%16%27%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 314%7%20%19%46%
Grade 427%12%7%15%17%
Grade 522%2%6%10%15%
Grade 613%6%3%8%12%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
17%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
9%
13%
78%
Grade 4 · 22% proficient
12%
20%
68%
Grade 5 · 32% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.7pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.6%
State 21.3%
10.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-16.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
27.4%
State 42.7%
15.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.7%
State 17.9%
2.8pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.3%
State 1.6%
0.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.2%
State 18.0%
4.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Almond Elementary in Fontana, 28.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Almond Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 191 students tested.

All students at this school: 25% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 25%, district —, state 43%25%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 25%, district 32%, state 32%25% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 24%, district 31%, state 32%24% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 25%, district 32%, state 42%25% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 25%, district 33%, state 44%25% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 7%, state 11%4% · −21 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 9%, state 15%12% · −13 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.7%, district 24.8%, state 17.9%20.7% · +2.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.3%, district —, state 1.6%1.3% · −0.3pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (38.0% vs 20.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.3%
TK/K38.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 22:121:1
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience18.4 years
Fully credentialed86%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,343 – $132,186
Principal salary$155,206 – $180,978
Superintendent salary$366,857

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,396, CA average $14,815$16,396 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$1,416 per student

$1,416 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,037 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,217 per pupil
2019$14,629 per pupil
2018$15,045 per pupil
2017$13,064 per pupil
2016$12,756 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic88.8%
District 85.8% · CA 56.1%
White4.3%
District 4.0% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.9%
District 2.2% · CA 10.2%
Black2.6%
District 5.2% · CA 4.8%
Other1.4%
District 2.7% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 85.2% (21pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$78K · CA $85K
Median home value$462K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+10% · CA 35%
ZIP population97,511
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Almond Elementary a good elementary school?

Almond Elementary has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 29th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,087 statewide. 10.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Almond Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 27.4% of students at Almond Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 352 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Almond Elementary rank in California?

Almond Elementary ranks #4,087 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 29th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Almond Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Almond Elementary decreases by 16.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Almond Elementary?

20.7% of students at Almond Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Almond Elementary compare to other schools in Fontana?

Almond Elementary scores 35/100 (29th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 418 students. Use the schools in Fontana page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Almond Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Almond Elementary in Fontana, 28.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Almond Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 191 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 40th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-16.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
27.4%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 38th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.7%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 46th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 52th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35215%17%27%40%33%−11
Grade 4649%13%25%53%22%−23
Grade 56012%20%27%42%32%−16
Grade 6514%24%39%33%27%−19
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35217%29%13%40%46%+0
Grade 4645%13%33%50%17%−24
Grade 5605%10%22%63%15%−20
Grade 6522%10%25%63%12%−23
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11602%17%55%27%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19128.3%−10−10
Hispanic/Latino19928.1%−11−11
Students with Disabilities5111.8%+0−5
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Almond Elementary ←3510.6%27.4%−16.11.3%
East Heritage Elementary0.6 mi6940.6%67.2%−10.00.4%
Etiwanda Colony Elementary3 mi6740.6%67.0%−1.00.6%
Grapeland Elementary2.1 mi6745.4%70.7%−5.30.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193943#31538.3%26.5%10.1%0.7%+11.9pp
20222212#50672.6%11.7%47.1%1.2%+0.8pp
20232310#51564.7%17.0%34.0%3.5%-5.7pp
20243427#41676.8%19.0%19.7%1.9%-7.6pp
20253529#408710.6%27.4%20.7%1.3%-16.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.6%20.9%+13.3pp
Male12.3%21.0%+8.7pp
Black/African American10.5%27.3%+16.8pp
Hispanic/Latino10.1%21.4%+11.3pp
Students with Disabilities18.8%19.0%+0.2pp
English Learners7.8%10.8%+3.0pp
Foster Youth9.1%
Homeless30.8%30.0%-0.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.1%21.9%+12.8pp
All Students10.1%20.9%+10.8pp
Asian0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction