ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Charter middle school

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle

Los Angeles, CA · Grades 6-8 · 390 students · Los Angeles Unified

No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

40% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 26% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

Building Momentum

What this means for your family

This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

How archetypes are assigned →

Math

26%

Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced

English

40%

Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

390

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

24%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 29%2022: 20%2023: 17%2024: 25%2025: 26%2019: 48%2022: 34%2023: 38%2024: 42%2025: 40%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 29%2022: 20%2023: 17%2024: 25%2025: 26%2019: 48%2022: 34%2023: 38%2024: 42%2025: 40%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201929%48%
202220%34%
202317%38%
202425%42%
202526%40%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Has stayed near the 44th percentile since 2019.

Most rating sites would stop at “34% proficient” and call it done. Alliance Jack H. Skirball deserves a closer read. Nearly all of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, Alliance Jack H. Skirball enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

399 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 118 tracked

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 34% meet the standard today, versus 39% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

Percentile among 2,177 middle schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 48th percentile · Scope Score 35 of 1002022 · 25th percentile · Scope Score 22 of 1002023 · 32nd percentile · Scope Score 23 of 1002024 · 44th percentile · Scope Score 33 of 1002025 · 44th percentile · Scope Score 34 of 100
ELAYellow(Increased)MathYellow(Increased)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 648%35%40%47%38%
Grade 748%23%24%39%43%
Grade 849%33%36%37%42%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 632%22%25%27%32%
Grade 734%11%19%26%31%
Grade 827%18%8%22%21%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

One in three of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.

ELA41% met or exceeded
Exceeded 13%Met 28%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 33%
Math28% met or exceeded
Exceeded 12%Met 16%Nearly Met 25%Not Met 48%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California middle schools · average17% exceeded · 40% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)AbsenceSuspension
This school3413%34%Average · p4924.4%1.2%
CA average · Middle School3917%40%Average · p5018.1%3.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope3439
% Exceeded13%17%
% Met+34%40%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Average · p49Average · p50
Absence24.4%18.1%
Suspension1.2%3.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

Our growth read and California's own model disagree here — the 49th percentile against the state's 74th.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 49th percentile of California middle schools; the state's puts it around the 74th in reading and math together — a better read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 6
9%
exceeded standard · 40% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 8
15%
exceeded standard · 42% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G6→G8SchoolScope growth measure: 49th percentile among California middle schools.49th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +11 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 82nd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.82nd pctile · +11 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 65th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.65th pctile · +6 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.

At Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle in Los Angeles, 42.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (44.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 384 students tested.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 34% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 34%, district —, state 40%34%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 35%, district 36%, state 32%35% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 38%, district 36%, state 32%38% · +4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 42%, state 44%36% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 32%, district 41%, state 42%32% · −2 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 25%, district 30%, state 26%25% · −9 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 6%, district 9%, state 11%6% · −28 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 11%, district 14%, state 15%11% · −24 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students350 studentsLow-income students, reading: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 350 students.+11 pts · +14 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students258 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 258 students.+12 pts · +14 vs typical
English Only171 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 171 students.+10 pts · +10 vs typical
English Learner100 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: +5 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 100 students.+5 pts · +10 vs typical
Black students85 studentsBlack students, reading: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −4 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 85 students.+6 pts · +10 vs typical
Math
Low-income students350 studentsLow-income students, math: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 350 students.+6 pts · +11 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students259 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 259 students.+6 pts · +12 vs typical
English Only171 studentsEnglish Only, math: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 171 students.+6 pts · +9 vs typical
English Learner101 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +5 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 101 students.+5 pts · +8 vs typical
Black students85 studentsBlack students, math: +2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 85 students.+2 pts · +10 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 23 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher23 · district 20
Teaching staff17 teachers
Avg. experience7.9 years
Fully credentialed86%
Intern / emergency permit7.9%
PrincipalJamal Richardson
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.

24.4% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 18.1% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — the data can't say why.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 24.4%, district 22.8%, state 18.1%24.4% · +6.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 3.6%1.2% · −2.4pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

Its district spends $18,180 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,180, CA average $14,491$18,180 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 52%Instruction support 16%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Nearly all of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

At 390 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 34% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino73.3% · district 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Black23.3% · district 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other3.3% · district 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch96.9% · CA 64%
Median income$56K · CA $85K
Median home value$584K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+10% · CA 35%
ZIP population37,511
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Alliance Jack H. Skirball MiddleCharterDeveloping13%34%School being viewed
Davis MiddlePublicStrong23%53%2.7 mi
Bunche MiddlePublicSolid13%36%2.1 mi
Vox Collegiate of Los AngelesCharterSolid13%32%2.7 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in Los Angeles →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle a good middle school?
Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 44th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,218 statewide. 12.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.7 percentage points below the California average of 17.2%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.4% of students at Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.5% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 799 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle rank in California?
Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle ranks #1,218 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 44th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle that cohort is 2023 G6 → 2025 G8, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks average among California middle schools — roughly the 49th percentile, behind the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the middle Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle?
24.4% of students at Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle scores 34/100 (44th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 390 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle in Los Angeles, 42.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (44.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 384 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

The 5 things our score weighs

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 45 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard12.5%17.2%42%
Met or exceeded34.4%40.0%23%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Averageaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism24.4%18.1%5%
Suspension rate1.2%3.6%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle: reading the evidence

Alliance Jack H. Skirball posts 34% meeting the standard and 12.5% exceeding it, against 40% and 17.2% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle is ranked #1,218 statewide · #128 of 225 in Los Angeles Unified.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard12.5%17.2%42%
Met or exceeded34.4%40.0%23%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Averageaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism24.4%18.1%5%
Suspension rate1.2%3.6%5%
Exceeded standard
↓ vs CA 17.2% · index 45 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 40.0% · index 46 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
↓ vs CA average · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 18.1% · index 42 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.2pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.9pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 612810%28%20%42%38%−8
Grade 712715%28%22%35%43%−5
Grade 814415%27%35%23%42%−5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 612813%19%20%48%32%−2
Grade 712712%19%28%41%31%−3
Grade 814510%11%26%53%21%−11

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide14510%23%57%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38442.2%+1+4
Hispanic/Latino29444.2%+3+5
Black/African American9333.3%−2+1
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle ←3412.5%34.4%−3.6pp+45 pts1.2%
Davis Middle2.7 mi5922.6%53.5%−6.6pp0.1%
Bunche Middle2.1 mi4313.1%36.1%+6.2pp0.2%
Vox Collegiate of Los Angeles2.7 mi4012.8%31.5%+12.6pp0.6%
California average3917.2%40.0%+1.5pp3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193548#100913.1%39.5%12.6%2.3%-1.8pp
20222225#15936.3%23.8%43.6%4.3%-3.1pp
20232332#14497.7%25.3%33.3%4.4%-10.3pp
20243344#119810.8%33.0%24.6%2.1%-7.3pp
20253444#121812.5%34.4%24.4%1.2%-3.6pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+11353Accelerated+6354Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+11350Accelerated+6350Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino+12258Accelerated+6259Accelerated
English Only+10171not categorised+6171not categorised
English Learner+5100Accelerated+5101Accelerated
Black or African American+685Accelerated+285Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+1267not categorised+467not categorised
Students with Disabilities−945Moderate+445Average
English Learners Only−733not categorised+1034not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)+628Accelerated+329Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/alliance-jack-h-skirball-middle-1518"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.