ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Alamosa Park Elementary · Oceanside

Alamosa Park Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Alamosa Park posts 55% meeting the standard, and 26.6% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

5130 Alamosa Park Drive, 92057 (opens in new tab)·Vista Unified·Oceanside·Grades TK-5·549 students·48% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 940-0700·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5745
% Exceeded27%21%
% Met+55%43%
Growth-6.2-2.9
Absence12.7%17.9%
Suspension1.4%1.6%
Scope Score
57
🤝 Culture First · Solid
ranked #1,265 statewide · #3 of 16 in Vista Unified

Alamosa Park Elementary scores 57 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 78th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “55% proficient” and call it done. Alamosa Park deserves a closer read. The school sits in Oceanside, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 78th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 55% meet the standard today, versus 62% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 367%52%41%48%49%
Grade 463%64%51%51%58%
Grade 566%69%63%61%57%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 362%64%44%57%63%
Grade 467%53%59%51%62%
Grade 548%54%61%56%43%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

18%
31%
51%
Grade 3 · 49% proficient
35%
23%
42%
Grade 4 · 58% proficient
19%
37%
44%
Grade 5 · 56% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 7.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
26.6%
State 21.3%
5.3pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-6.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
55.4%
State 42.7%
12.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.7%
State 17.9%
5.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.4%
State 1.6%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.0%
State 18.0%
4.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Alamosa Park Elementary in Oceanside, 47.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alamosa Park Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.0 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 118 students tested.

All students at this school: 56% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 56%, district —, state 43%56%
FemaleFemale: this school 53%, district 39%, state 44%53% · −3 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 46%, district 30%, state 32%46% · −10 vs school
MaleMale: this school 59%, district 39%, state 42%59% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 43%, district 29%, state 32%43% · −12 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 67%, district 60%, state 56%67% · +12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 19%, district 14%, state 15%19% · −37 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 59%, district 54%, state 56%59% · +3 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 14.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.7%, district 22.4%, state 17.9%12.7% · −5.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.4%, district —, state 1.6%1.4% · −0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–69.9%
TK/K13.4%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Vista Innovation and Design Academy, which scores 18 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 22:124:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience18.4 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$57,722 – $120,983
Principal salary$161,808 – $178,935
Superintendent salary$320,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,710, CA average $14,815$18,710 · spent at this school
Federal share$555 per student

$555 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,783 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,817 per pupil
2019$13,241 per pupil
2018$14,041 per pupil
2017$11,234 per pupil
2016$10,657 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic48.3%
District 66.4% · CA 56.1%
White33.5%
District 21.5% · CA 19.9%
Other15.5%
District 8.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.0%
District 1.8% · CA 10.2%
Black0.7%
District 2.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 48.5% (15pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$109K · CA $85K
Median home value$743K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+33% · CA 35%
ZIP population56,835
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 37% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Alamosa Park Elementary a good elementary school?

Alamosa Park Elementary has a Scope Score of 57 out of 100, placing it in the 78th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,265 statewide. 26.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Alamosa Park Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 55.4% of students at Alamosa Park Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 26.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 28.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 26.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 484 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Alamosa Park Elementary rank in California?

Alamosa Park Elementary ranks #1,265 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 78th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Alamosa Park Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Alamosa Park Elementary decreases by 6.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Alamosa Park Elementary?

12.7% of students at Alamosa Park Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.4%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Alamosa Park Elementary compare to other schools in Oceanside?

Alamosa Park Elementary scores 57/100 (78th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 549 students. Use the schools in Oceanside page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Alamosa Park Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Alamosa Park Elementary in Oceanside, 47.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alamosa Park Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.0 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 118 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
26.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 55th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-6.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 67th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
55.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 60th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 58th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.4%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 52th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38918%31%31%19%49%+6
Grade 48635%23%20%22%58%+13
Grade 56719%37%21%22%57%+9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38924%39%22%15%63%+17
Grade 48634%28%27%12%62%+20
Grade 56730%13%30%27%43%+8
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116713%24%52%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11847.5%+12+9
Hispanic/Latino11440.3%+6+2
White8667.4%+3+6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Alamosa Park Elementary ←5726.6%55.4%−6.21.4%
Libby Elementary1.6 mi6320.8%48.3%+36.71.1%
Coastal Academy Charter2.4 mi5830.5%56.9%−4.81.0%
Bonsall West Elementary1.8 mi5728.6%56.1%−8.22.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195372#156530.8%62.2%4.9%0.8%-7.4pp
20224975#144027.5%59.3%44.8%1.6%+3.7pp
20236286#77926.4%53.1%21.6%3.2%+19.8pp
20245576#135626.9%54.0%11.7%1.3%+6.1pp
20255778#126526.6%55.4%12.7%1.4%-6.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.9%12.3%+6.4pp
Male3.3%12.5%+9.2pp
Asian0.0%18.2%+18.2pp
Black/African American0.0%
White0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino7.1%17.8%+10.7pp
Two or More Races6.7%11.1%+4.4pp
Students with Disabilities7.1%23.4%+16.3pp
English Learners5.4%33.3%+27.9pp
Homeless27.6%6.7%-20.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.3%17.0%+7.7pp
All Students4.7%12.4%+7.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction