Akers Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Akers posts 67% meeting the standard, and 34.0% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 61 | 34% | 67% | -0.2 | 4.4% | 2.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Akers Elementary scores 61 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 84th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “67% proficient” and call it done. Akers deserves a closer read. It sits at the 84th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Akers's low-income kids hit 56.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 84th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 67% of students meet the standard today, above the 60% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 47% | 51% | 65% | 62% | 69% |
| Grade 4 | 77% | 50% | 58% | 71% | 75% |
| Grade 5 | 69% | 63% | 60% | 52% | 76% |
| Grade 6 | 52% | 48% | 42% | 59% | 57% |
| Grade 7 | 64% | 59% | 51% | 54% | 67% |
| Grade 8 | 66% | 65% | 66% | 51% | 72% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 44% | 54% | 57% | 55% | 62% |
| Grade 4 | 67% | 56% | 69% | 68% | 66% |
| Grade 5 | 57% | 56% | 54% | 52% | 55% |
| Grade 6 | 34% | 32% | 34% | 48% | 49% |
| Grade 7 | 42% | 47% | 20% | 45% | 47% |
| Grade 8 | 48% | 49% | 56% | 35% | 49% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 9.2pp across grades; the floor rises 6.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Akers's most underrated number
56.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Akers Elementary in N.A.S. Lemoore, 56.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Akers Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (46.7% Math proficient); White students (73.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 13.0 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 75 students tested.
6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$4 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 54% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Akers Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Akers Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Akers Elementary rank in California?
Is Akers Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Akers Elementary?
How does Akers Elementary compare to other schools in N.A.S. Lemoore?
How does Akers Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42 | 36% | 33% | 17% | 14% | 69% | +26 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 46% | 29% | 11% | 14% | 75% | +30 |
| Grade 5 | 49 | 27% | 49% | 18% | 6% | 76% | +28 |
| Grade 6 | 102 | 20% | 37% | 25% | 19% | 57% | +10 |
| Grade 7 | 83 | 25% | 42% | 18% | 14% | 67% | +20 |
| Grade 8 | 79 | 29% | 43% | 20% | 8% | 72% | +26 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42 | 24% | 38% | 24% | 14% | 62% | +16 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 41% | 25% | 25% | 9% | 66% | +24 |
| Grade 5 | 49 | 31% | 24% | 33% | 12% | 55% | +20 |
| Grade 6 | 102 | 21% | 28% | 27% | 24% | 49% | +14 |
| Grade 7 | 83 | 25% | 22% | 30% | 23% | 47% | +13 |
| Grade 8 | 79 | 32% | 18% | 30% | 20% | 49% | +17 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 126 | 22% | 32% | 44% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 75 | 56.0% | +18 | +18 |
| White | 159 | 73.0% | +3 | +11 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 105 | 59.0% | +18 | +20 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akers Elementary ← | — | 61 | 34.0% | 67.1% | −0.2 | 2.5% |
| R. J. Neutra | 0.7 mi | 61 | 37.1% | 66.1% | +4.4 | 1.9% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 62 | 83 | #957 | 26.1% | 60.1% | 3.7% | 2.7% | +17.6pp |
| 2022 | 55 | 82 | #1012 | 24.1% | 54.9% | 15.3% | 2.5% | +7.8pp |
| 2023 | 52 | 75 | #1404 | 26.9% | 60.3% | 5.2% | 2.2% | -4.0pp |
| 2024 | 58 | 80 | #1124 | 30.6% | 59.9% | 4.9% | 3.0% | -6.3pp |
| 2025 | 61 | 84 | #938 | 34.0% | 67.1% | 4.4% | 2.5% | -0.2pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.1% | 2.5% | -0.6pp |
| Male | 4.0% | 3.4% | -0.6pp |
| Black/African American | 3.5% | 2.8% | -0.7pp |
| White | 0.0% | 2.9% | +2.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 4.7% | 4.0% | -0.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 4.8% | 3.0% | -1.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 6.4% | 3.7% | -2.7pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | 8.3% | +8.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 4.5% | 4.6% | +0.1pp |
| All Students | 3.6% | 3.0% | -0.6pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction