ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Abraham Lincoln · Paramount

Abraham Lincoln: 47% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 43%. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.

Abraham Lincoln posts 47% meeting the standard, against 43% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.

15324 California Avenue, 90723 (opens in new tab)·Paramount Unified·Paramount·Grades TK-5·502 students·94% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 602-8036
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4145
% Exceeded21%21%
% Met+47%43%
Growth-16.5-2.9
Absence20.0%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
41
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,158 statewide · #3 of 11 in Paramount Unified

Abraham Lincoln scores 41 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 45th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “47% proficient” and call it done. Abraham Lincoln deserves a closer read. The school sits in Paramount, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Abraham Lincoln's low-income kids hit 50.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 72nd to the 45th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 47% meet the standard today, versus 56% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 347%49%51%36%56%
Grade 452%46%46%43%48%
Grade 563%49%47%47%55%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 366%61%55%56%56%
Grade 455%32%36%41%46%
Grade 553%25%34%31%24%

The story this school is actually telling

The floor · met or exceeded
47.3%

of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 42.7% statewide.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 3→5
16.5pp

proficiency runs 56% in this year's grade 3 against 39% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
35%
44%
Grade 3 · 56% proficient
26%
22%
52%
Grade 4 · 48% proficient
21%
34%
45%
Grade 5 · 55% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

50.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Abraham Lincoln's most underrated number

50.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Abraham Lincoln low-income: 50.5%State low-income: 38.2%Abraham Lincoln EL: 19.3%State EL: 10.4%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.9%
State 21.3%
0.4pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-16.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
47.3%
State 42.7%
4.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.0%
State 17.9%
2.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.9%
State 18.0%
4.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Abraham Lincoln in Paramount, 50.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abraham Lincoln outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (38.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (52.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 212 students tested.

All students at this school: 47% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 47%, district —, state 43%47%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 44%, district 34%, state 32%44% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 47%, district 35%, state 32%47% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 47%, district 36%, state 44%47% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 47%, district 32%, state 42%47% · +0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 18%, district 10%, state 11%18% · −29 vs school

8 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.0%, district 24.3%, state 17.9%20.0% · +2.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −1.0pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (29.6% vs 19.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.4%
TK/K29.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Abraham Lincoln
41/100
This school
High School

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 20:122:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience18.0 years
Fully credentialed89%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$73,292 – $138,335
Principal salary$188,208 – $204,698
Superintendent salary$316,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,624, CA average $14,815$23,624 · spent at this school
Federal share$101 per student

$101 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,268 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction68%
Instruction support11%
Student services7%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,272 per pupil
2019$13,970 per pupil
2018$13,949 per pupil
2017$12,942 per pupil
2016$12,153 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic93.2%
District 88.5% · CA 56.1%
Black3.8%
District 7.5% · CA 4.8%
Other1.4%
District 2.2% · CA 9.0%
White1.2%
District 0.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.4%
District 0.9% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 94.4% (31pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$75K · CA $85K
Median home value$534K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population52,050
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Abraham Lincoln a good elementary school?

Abraham Lincoln has a Scope Score of 41 out of 100, placing it in the 45th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,158 statewide. 20.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Abraham Lincoln's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 47.3% of students at Abraham Lincoln met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 457 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Abraham Lincoln rank in California?

Abraham Lincoln ranks #3,158 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 45th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Abraham Lincoln getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Abraham Lincoln decreases by 16.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Abraham Lincoln?

20.0% of students at Abraham Lincoln are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Abraham Lincoln compare to other schools in Paramount?

Abraham Lincoln scores 41/100 (45th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 502 students. Use the schools in Paramount page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Abraham Lincoln serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Abraham Lincoln in Paramount, 50.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abraham Lincoln outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (38.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (52.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 212 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.9%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 50th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-16.5pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
47.3%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 54th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.9%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37221%35%25%19%56%+12
Grade 46926%22%19%33%48%+3
Grade 58621%34%19%27%55%+7
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37321%36%16%27%56%+10
Grade 47024%21%27%27%46%+4
Grade 58713%11%45%31%24%−11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11877%15%64%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21250.5%+8+12
Hispanic/Latino21052.9%+9+14
English Learners5719.3%+7+9
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Abraham Lincoln ←4120.9%47.3%−16.50.7%
Las Flores Home Education Independent Study Academ2.5 mi7031.1%64.6%−4.00.6%
Kelly Elementary2.3 mi5523.0%45.2%+0.91.1%
Washington Elementary2.8 mi5524.1%50.5%+20.31.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195372#156727.2%55.7%10.3%0.1%+1.4pp
20223138#357819.5%43.7%47.7%0.9%-18.4pp
20234154#261319.5%44.9%37.1%0.3%-12.7pp
20243840#344818.5%42.4%23.1%0.5%-7.0pp
20254145#315820.9%47.3%20.0%0.7%-16.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.0%19.9%+8.9pp
Male9.6%20.3%+10.7pp
Black/African American16.7%34.8%+18.1pp
Hispanic/Latino9.7%19.8%+10.1pp
Students with Disabilities18.6%37.7%+19.1pp
English Learners10.1%17.4%+7.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.6%20.5%+9.9pp
All Students10.3%20.1%+9.8pp
Homeless7.1%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction