Schools in 90650 — Norwalk, California: 90650 schools average near the state. The 38.2-point spread is where the choice actually lives.
90650 has 21 ranked schools in Norwalk, averaging a Scope Score of 45.6/100 — within 0.8 points of the state average of 44.8 (CDE CAASPP 2025). Scores range from 28.0 to 66.2, a 38.2-point spread.
How 90650 schools perform
The top-ranked school is Cresson Elementary with a Scope Score of 66 and 28.0% of students exceeding standard.
Chronic absenteeism across 90650 averages 18.8%, near the state average of 17.9%. CDE CAASPP 2025.
How 90650 compares to nearby zip codes
| Zip | City | Schools | Avg Score | vs 90650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90650 | Norwalk | 21 | Developing 45.6/100 | — |
| 90640 | Montebello | 12 | Developing 38.3/100 | -7.3 |
| 90660 | Pico Rivera | 14 | Developing 38.7/100 | -6.9 |
Source: CDE CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
School archetypes in 90650
Hidden gems: 4 schools in 90650 are classified as Growth Engine (2) or On the Rise (2) — showing positive growth trajectories that raw proficiency scores alone don't capture. These are schools where students leave with more than they arrived with.
Archetypes are data-driven labels based on Scope Score dimensions. Learn more
All schools in 90650
ranked by Scope Score · 2024–25 CAASPP
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cresson Elementary Little Lake City Elementary Growth Engine | 28.0% | Solid 66/100 |
| 2 | Julia B. Morrison Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 37.1% | Solid 61/100 |
| 3 | Studebaker Elementary Little Lake City Elementary Strong All-Around | 27.9% | Solid 60/100 |
| 4 | Lakeland Elementary Little Lake City Elementary Building Momentum | 32.8% | Solid 59/100 |
| 5 | Paddison Elementary Little Lake City Elementary Building Momentum | 39.2% | Solid 57/100 |
| 6 | Norwalk High Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 18.2% | Solid 54/100 |
| 7 | Lakeside Middle Little Lake City Elementary Building Momentum | 22.6% | Solid 53/100 |
| 8 | William W. Orr Elementary Little Lake City Elementary Building Momentum | 29.6% | Developing 49/100 |
| 9 | John H. Glenn High Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 10.3% | Developing 45/100 |
| 10 | D. D. Johnston Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Growth Engine | 23.3% | Developing 45/100 |
| 11 | Los Alisos Middle Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 14.3% | Developing 43/100 |
| 12 | New River Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified On the Rise | 9.0% | Developing 42/100 |
| 13 | Corvallis Middle Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 13.5% | Developing 42/100 |
| 14 | Anna M. Glazier Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 11.4% | Developing 41/100 |
| 15 | John H. Nuffer Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 10.7% | Developing 39/100 |
| 16 | Loretta Lampton Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 17.3% | Developing 37/100 |
| 17 | John Dolland Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 24.5% | Developing 36/100 |
| 18 | Nettie L. Waite Middle Norwalk-La Mirada Unified On the Rise | 7.6% | Developing 35/100 |
| 19 | Arturo Sanchez Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Culture First | 11.3% | Developing 34/100 |
| 20 | Thomas B. Moffitt Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 7.7% | Developing 32/100 |
| 21 | Earl E. Edmondson Elementary Norwalk-La Mirada Unified Building Momentum | 10.9% | Needs Support 28/100 |
Schools in 90650 on the map
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
Numbers tell you whether students are clearing the bar. A school visit tells you whether they're happy doing it. These metrics are intentionally missing from the Scope Score: class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality; arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs; teacher experience and turnover; campus safety and social-emotional support; parent and community engagement; quality of special education and gifted programs; how school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access. Full methodology