School district · Los Angeles County

Redondo Beach Unified schools

Redondo Beach Unified’s 8 public elementary schools all sit between the 83rd and the 97th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 8 schools

from 83rd to 97th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Alta Vista Elementary: 97th percentile, Strong
  • Birney Elementary: 97th percentile, Strong
  • Tulita Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Lincoln Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Jefferson Elementary: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Madison Elementary: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Beryl Heights Elementary: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Washington Elementary: 83rd percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
8Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 2 schools

from 74th to 93rd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Adams Middle: 93rd percentile, Strong
  • Parras (Nick G.) Middle: 74th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
1Strong

High · 1 school

at 89th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Redondo Union High: 89th percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Redondo Beach Unified

13 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Redondo Beach Unified score highest?

Alta Vista Elementary and Birney Elementary are highest, both at the 97th percentile.

That’s higher than 97 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Redondo Beach Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 5 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Redondo Beach Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Redondo Beach Unified score highest?

Adams Middle is highest, at the 93rd percentile.

That’s higher than 93 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Redondo Beach Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

High schools

Where does the high school we score in Redondo Beach Unified stand?

Redondo Union High is at the 89th percentile.

That’s higher than 89 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). It’s the only public high school we score in Redondo Beach Unified.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools and court and community schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with its own kind or not ranked.

The district

Where does Redondo Beach Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Redondo Beach Unified spent $15,012 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Redondo Beach Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction67%
  • Instruction support8%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration9%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$112.0 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 44 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 79% of its $141.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 142 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 81% of the money. The plan itself puts 80% of it toward staff.

  • Highly Qualified Teaching Staff $55.1 million
  • Special Education Programming $24.3 million
  • School Facilities and Maintenance & Operations $11.8 million
  • 41 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

6 of the plan’s 44 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $556,100
  • English learners $612,438

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Supplemental English Language Development Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development to Support EL and LTEL Progress and Language Acquisition$432,438
  • District-level MTSS Coordinator$237,000
  • High School Credit Recovery$139,100
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $4.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $4.1 million and estimates it spent $4.1 million, within 1% of the plan.

What changed

The total is $9.4 million (9%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Conferences and External Professional Development Opportunities, which went from $10,000 to $4.2 million.

Largest cuts

  • Materials and Supplies−⁠$1.3 million
  • Supplemental School-based Counseling Services for Unduplicated Pupils−⁠$349,409

Largest increases

  • Conferences and External Professional Development Opportunities+⁠$4.2 million
  • Highly Qualified Teaching Staff+⁠$1.8 million
  • School-based Counseling+⁠$1.3 million

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Professional development for CTE teachers on industry trends, instructional strategies, and integrated academics$1.1 million
  • Upgrade CTE labs and equipment to meet current industry and postsecondary standards, ensuring students are prepared for career and college pathways$1.0 million
  • Develop a Comprehensive Work-Based Learning Continuum$532,698

Ask: What did Materials and Supplies pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $1.3 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 171%73%up 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 368%69%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 29 in 10010 in 1001 more in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 2 and 31.2%1.2%no change

Goal 4 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Highly Qualified Teaching Staff · $55,089,039
  • Special Education Programming · $24,312,685
  • School Facilities and Maintenance & Operations · $11,764,804
The full plan4 goals, 50 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($112.0 million).

Where does the money go?

75% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Increase student achievement to ensure college and career readiness through access to diverse course…$83.5 million75% of action budgets

“Increase student achievement to ensure college and career readiness through access to diverse course offerings, and the implementation of research-based instructional strategies and professional development as measured by state and local metrics” p. 13 ↗

24 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $75.7 million (+⁠$7.8 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Highly Qualified Teaching Staff$55.1 millionaction 1.1 · p. 97 ↗
  2. School Facilities and Maintenance & Operations$11.8 millionaction 1.3 · p. 97 ↗
  3. Conferences and External Professional Development Opportunities$4.2 millionaction 1.18 · p. 98 ↗
  4. School-based Counseling$3.5 millionaction 1.4 · p. 97 ↗
  5. Materials and Supplies$2.7 millionaction 1.2 · p. 97 ↗

19 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional development for CTE teachers on industry trends, instructional strategies, and integrated academics · action 1.23 · p. 99 ↗$1.1 million
  • Replenish Textbooks, Instructional Materials, and Digital Licenses · action 1.15 · p. 98 ↗$1.0 million
  • Upgrade CTE labs and equipment to meet current industry and postsecondary standards, ensuring students are prepared for career and college pathways · action 1.22 · p. 99 ↗$1.0 million
  • Supplemental English Language Development Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development to Support EL and LTEL Progress and Language Acquisition · action 1.11 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Teacher Professional Development Day · action 1.14 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Supplemental School-based Counseling Services for Unduplicated Pupils · action 1.7 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Middle School Teachers on Special Assignments (TOSA) · action 1.8 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • District-level Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSA) · action 1.16 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • District-level MTSS Coordinator · action 1.9 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Implement District-wide Benchmark · action 1.12 · p. 98 ↗$0.2 million
  • Supplemental Academic and Social-Emotional Counseling · action 1.17 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • High School Teacher on Special Assignment (TOSA) · action 1.19 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • School Site Instructional Leadership Team Coaching Support · action 1.20 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • High School Credit Recovery · action 1.10 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Supplemental Academic Support for Secondary English Learners · action 1.5 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Expand dual enrollment and postsecondary options · action 1.24 · p. 99 ↗$0.1 million
  • English Learner Site Specialists · action 1.6 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Tutoring Support for Unduplicated Students · action 1.13 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Development Science Instruction · action 1.21 · p. 99 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Conferences and External Professional Development Opportunities+⁠$4.2 millionunder $0.1 million → $4.2 million · p. 98 ↗
  2. Highly Qualified Teaching Staff+⁠$1.8 million$53.3 million → $55.1 million · p. 97 ↗
  3. School-based Counseling+⁠$1.3 million$2.1 million → $3.5 million · p. 97 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • School Facilities and Maintenance & Operations · $11.7 million → $11.8 million · p. 97 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Materials and Supplies · $4.0 million → $2.7 million · p. 97 ↗−⁠$1.3 million
  • Professional development for CTE teachers on industry trends, instructional strategies, and integrated academics · $1.1 million · p. 99 ↗new or renamed
  • Replenish Textbooks, Instructional Materials, and Digital Licenses · $0.3 million → $1.0 million · p. 98 ↗+⁠$0.7 million
  • Upgrade CTE labs and equipment to meet current industry and postsecondary standards, ensuring students are prepared for career and college pathways · $1.0 million · p. 99 ↗new or renamed
  • Supplemental English Language Development Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development to Support EL and LTEL Progress and Language Acquisition · $432,438 · p. 98 ↗new or renamed
  • Teacher Professional Development Day · $563,000 → $350,000 · p. 98 ↗−⁠$213,000
  • Supplemental School-based Counseling Services for Unduplicated Pupils · $690,852 → $341,443 · p. 97 ↗−⁠$349,409
  • Middle School Teachers on Special Assignments (TOSA) · $280,000 → $300,000 · p. 97 ↗+⁠$20,000
  • District-level Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSA) · $280,000 · p. 98 ↗new or renamed
  • District-level MTSS Coordinator · $120,000 → $237,000 · p. 98 ↗+⁠$117,000
  • Implement District-wide Benchmark · $75,000 → $200,000 · p. 98 ↗+⁠$125,000
  • Supplemental Academic and Social-Emotional Counseling · $180,000 → $180,000 · p. 98 ↗unchanged
  • High School Teacher on Special Assignment (TOSA) · $125,000 → $155,000 · p. 98 ↗+⁠$30,000
  • School Site Instructional Leadership Team Coaching Support · $80,000 → $150,000 · p. 99 ↗+⁠$70,000
  • High School Credit Recovery · $50,000 → $139,100 · p. 98 ↗+⁠$89,100
  • Supplemental Academic Support for Secondary English Learners · $130,000 → $130,000 · p. 97 ↗unchanged
  • Expand dual enrollment and postsecondary options · $100,000 · p. 99 ↗new or renamed
  • English Learner Site Specialists · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 97 ↗unchanged
  • Tutoring Support for Unduplicated Students · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 98 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Development Science Instruction · $50,000 → $20,000 · p. 99 ↗−⁠$30,000

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 21 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 13 ↗.

Goal 2Improve student resiliency, student engagement, and school climate through social, emotional development…$2.1 million2% of action budgets

“Improve student resiliency, student engagement, and school climate through social, emotional development, whole child engagement, and by maximizing physical and emotional safety as measured by state and local metrics” p. 40 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.5 million (+⁠$584,391)

Largest funded actions

  1. Whole Child Education Programming$900,000action 2.5 · p. 99 ↗
  2. Mental Health Services$759,391action 2.8 · p. 99 ↗
  3. District-level Support Services Liaison$250,000action 2.6 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. District-wide Student Attendance and Chronic Absenteeism System$110,000action 2.1 · p. 99 ↗
  5. Social-Emotional Learning Curriculum$50,000action 2.7 · p. 99 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • California Healthy Kids Survey Administration · action 2.2 · p. 99 ↗$3,300
  • Support and Promote Student Connectedness Initiatives · action 2.4 · p. 99 ↗$1,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Mental Health Services+⁠$584,391$175,000 → $759,391 · p. 99 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Whole Child Education Programming · $900,000 → $900,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged
  • District-level Support Services Liaison · $250,000 → $250,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged
  • District-wide Student Attendance and Chronic Absenteeism System · $110,000 → $110,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged
  • Social-Emotional Learning Curriculum · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged
  • California Healthy Kids Survey Administration · $3,300 → $3,300 · p. 99 ↗unchanged
  • Support and Promote Student Connectedness Initiatives · $1,000 → $1,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 13 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 40 ↗.

Goal 3Improve inclusive practices to support equity, access, connectedness, and achievement for all learners as…$26.3 million24% of action budgets

“Improve inclusive practices to support equity, access, connectedness, and achievement for all learners as measured by state and local metrics” p. 54 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $25.3 million (+⁠$1.1 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Special Education Programming$24.3 millionaction 3.2 · p. 100 ↗
  2. After-school Enrichment for Unduplicated Pupils$0.7 millionaction 3.6 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Develop a Comprehensive Work-Based Learning Continuum$0.5 millionaction 3.8 · p. 100 ↗
  4. Site-based Supplemental Services for Unduplicated Students$0.4 millionaction 3.5 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Expand and strengthen CTE Pathways$0.3 millionaction 3.7 · p. 100 ↗

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Unduplicated Students Backpack Materials Giveaway · action 3.4 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Co-teach Co-planning Days · action 3.1 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Expand Career and Technical Education Pathways and Opportunities · action 3.3 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Special Education Programming+⁠$0.2 million$24.1 million → $24.3 million · p. 100 ↗
  2. Co-teach Co-planning Days−⁠$20,000$50,000 → $30,000 · p. 100 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • After-school Enrichment for Unduplicated Pupils · $700,000 → $700,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Develop a Comprehensive Work-Based Learning Continuum · $532,698 · p. 100 ↗new or renamed
  • Site-based Supplemental Services for Unduplicated Students · $400,000 → $400,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Expand and strengthen CTE Pathways · $329,070 · p. 100 ↗new or renamed
  • Unduplicated Students Backpack Materials Giveaway · $40,000 → $40,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Expand Career and Technical Education Pathways and Opportunities · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 54 ↗.

Goal 4Promote parent, family, and community engagement, involvement, and satisfaction as measured by state and local metrics$85,000under 1% of action budgets

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $95,000 (−⁠$10,000) · p. 68 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Summer Home Learning$40,000action 4.5 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Translation Services$20,000action 4.4 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Parent Engagement$10,000action 4.1 · p. 100 ↗
  4. Increased Parent Education Opportunities for Parents of Unduplicated Pupils$10,000action 4.3 · p. 100 ↗
  5. Monthly Parent Education Events$5,000action 4.2 · p. 100 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Increased Parent Education Opportunities for Parents of Unduplicated Pupils−⁠$10,000$20,000 → $10,000 · p. 100 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Summer Home Learning · $40,000 → $40,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Translation Services · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Parent Engagement · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged
  • Monthly Parent Education Events · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 68 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 9,470 students
1. White: 41%2. Hispanic or Latino: 25%3. Two or more races: 16%4. Asian: 13%5. Black or African American: 3%6. Filipino: 2%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. White41%
  2. Hispanic or Latino25%
  3. Two or more races16%
  4. Asian13%
  5. Black or African American3%
  6. Filipino2%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

17%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,595 of 9,454 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Redondo Beach Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 56% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (148 of 265 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Redondo Beach Unified rank highest?

Elementary: 2 schools at the 97th percentile (Strong): Alta Vista Elementary and Birney Elementary. Middle: Adams Middle, 93rd percentile (Strong). High: Redondo Union High, 89th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Redondo Beach Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Redondo Beach Unified good?

Redondo Beach Unified’s 8 public elementary schools run from the 83rd to the 97th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 8 Strong. Redondo Beach Unified’s 2 public middle schools run from the 74th to the 93rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 1 Solid. Redondo Beach Unified has one public high school we score, Redondo Union High, at the 89th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Redondo Beach Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Redondo Beach Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Redondo Beach Unified spend per student?

Redondo Beach Unified spent $15,012 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Redondo Beach Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Redondo Beach Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $112.0 million into 44 funded actions in 4 goals, 79% of its $141.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $83.5 million, 75% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Redondo Beach Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.