School district · Los Angeles County

Wiseburn Unified schools

Wiseburn Unified’s 4 public high schools run from the 38th to the 89th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). They sit in three of the four bands: Strong, Solid and Developing.

High · 4 schools

from 38th to 89th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Da Vinci Science: 89th percentile, Strong
  • Da Vinci Communications: 60th percentile, Solid
  • Da Vinci Design: 58th percentile, Solid
  • Da Vinci Connect: 38th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
2Solid
1Strong

One dot per school.

Elementary and middle school pictures

Elementary · 3 schools

from 57th to 78th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Aviation Elementary: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Del Aire Elementary: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Da Vinci Connect: 57th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
2Strong

Middle · 2 schools

from 72nd to 85th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Da Vinci Connect: 85th percentile, Strong
  • Wiseburn Middle: 72nd percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 7 ranked schools teaches all three levels, so it appears in more than one picture.

  • 7 ranked schools
  • 4 of 7 are charter schools
  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Wiseburn Unified

8 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Wiseburn Unified score highest?

Aviation Elementary is highest, at the 78th percentile.

That’s higher than 78 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Wiseburn Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Context

The average elementary school in Wiseburn Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Wiseburn Unified score highest?

Da Vinci Connect is highest, at the 85th percentile.

That’s higher than 85 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Wiseburn Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

High schools

Which high schools in Wiseburn Unified score highest?

Da Vinci Science is highest, at the 89th percentile.

That’s higher than 89 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Wiseburn Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

  • Da Vinci ScienceEl Segundo · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    89thStrongScope Score 75
  • Da Vinci CommunicationsEl Segundo · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    60thSolidScope Score 59
  • Da Vinci DesignEl Segundo · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    58thSolidScope Score 59
Show the other 1 high school
  • Da Vinci ConnectHawthorne · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    38thDevelopingScope Score 52
Context

The average high school in Wiseburn Unified had 14 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

1 high school not ranked statewide
  • Success Learning CenterSpecial education center: students are placed here by an IEP team, not by address and not by lottery, so we don’t rank it

The district

Where does Wiseburn Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Wiseburn Unified spent $17,467 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Wiseburn Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction66%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration8%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$30.8 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 49 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 66% of its $46.3 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 131 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 70% of the money. The plan itself puts 90% of it toward staff.

  • Certificated Staff $11.7 million
  • Classified Staff $5.7 million
  • Maintain Special Education Support $4.0 million
  • 46 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

5 of the plan’s 49 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $265,000
  • Math $165,000
  • Catch-up help $150,000
  • English learners $31,500

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Professional Learning - Elementary Mathematics Curriculum Implementation$165,000
  • Language Arts and MTSS TOSA$150,000
  • TK-8 English Language Arts Textbook Pilot, Program Adoption, and Professional Development$115,000
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $2.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $2.2 million and estimates it spent $2.8 million, $0.6 million (26%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $195,000 (1%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan.

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Language Arts and MTSS TOSA$150,000
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 363%62%down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 349%53%up 4 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 3 and 49 in 1008 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 3 and 41.5%1.3%down 0.2 pts

Goals 1 and 5 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Certificated Staff · $11,693,662
  • Classified Staff · $5,742,884
  • Maintain Special Education Support · $3,996,070
The full plan5 goals, 66 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($30.8 million).

Where does the money go?

57% to Goal 5, Organizational Strength. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Safety$3.2 million10% of action budgets

“We assure that every educational partner will have access to a safe learning environment, both physically and emotionally, with the presence of well-trained adults and students on campus” p. 12 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.2 million (+⁠$20,000)

Largest funded actions

  1. Routine Restricted Maintenance$1.4 millionaction 1.5 · p. 86 ↗
  2. Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP) Beyond the School Day$1.2 millionaction 1.6 · p. 86 ↗
  3. Registered Behavior Technician (RBT)$0.5 millionaction 1.7 · p. 86 ↗
  4. PowerSchool Trainingsunder $0.1 millionaction 1.8 · p. 86 ↗
  5. Student Technology Safety Measuresunder $0.1 millionaction 1.1 · p. 86 ↗

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Staff School Safety Training · action 1.2 · p. 86 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Routine Restricted Maintenance · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP) Beyond the School Day · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • Registered Behavior Technician (RBT) · $489,000 → $489,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • PowerSchool Trainings · $20,000 · p. 86 ↗new or renamed
  • Student Technology Safety Measures · $19,000 → $19,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • Staff School Safety Training · $3,500 → $3,500 · p. 86 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 12 ↗.

Goal 2Student-Centered/Whole Child$2.8 million9% of action budgets

“We assure that our instructional program and students’ entire experience at school are attentive to their unique academic and social emotional strengths, needs, and choices” p. 20 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.8 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. TK-8 Fine Arts Programs$1.4 millionaction 2.12 · p. 87 ↗
  2. TK-8 Physical Education Program$0.7 millionaction 2.11 · p. 87 ↗
  3. Professional Learning - Elementary Mathematics Curriculum Implementation$0.2 millionaction 2.8 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Online Teaching and Learning Supports$0.1 millionaction 2.7 · p. 87 ↗
  5. Site Leadership Guiding Coalition$0.1 millionaction 2.3 · p. 86 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • TK-8 English Language Arts Textbook Pilot, Program Adoption, and Professional Development · action 2.9 · p. 87 ↗$0.1 million
  • Pupil Access to Grade Level Curriculum · action 2.6 · p. 87 ↗$0.1 million
  • Report Card Revision · action 2.4 · p. 86 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Administrative PLC · action 2.1 · p. 86 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • TK-8 Fine Arts Programs · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • TK-8 Physical Education Program · $727,750 → $727,750 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Learning - Elementary Mathematics Curriculum Implementation · $165,000 → $165,000 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Online Teaching and Learning Supports · $123,000 → $123,000 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Site Leadership Guiding Coalition · $117,000 → $117,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • TK-8 English Language Arts Textbook Pilot, Program Adoption, and Professional Development · $115,000 → $115,000 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Pupil Access to Grade Level Curriculum · $80,000 → $80,000 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Report Card Revision · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged
  • Administrative PLC · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 13 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 20 ↗.

Goal 3Future Ready$5.8 million19% of action budgets

“We assure teaching and learning that includes academic and co-curricular programs to strengthen students’ ability to excel as life-long learners in an everchanging world” p. 35 ↗

15 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.6 million (+⁠$175,000)

Largest funded actions

  1. Maintain Special Education Support$4.0 millionaction 3.7 · p. 88 ↗
  2. Student Acceleration Support (SAS)$0.4 millionaction 3.19 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Language Acquisition Support$0.3 millionaction 3.2 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Language Acquisition Classroom Support$0.2 millionaction 3.1 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Program Specialist$0.2 millionaction 3.10 · p. 88 ↗

10 more funded actions in this goal

  • Library Clerks · action 3.14 · p. 88 ↗$0.2 million
  • STEAM/​PLTW Programs · action 3.12 · p. 88 ↗$0.2 million
  • Language Arts and MTSS TOSA · action 3.21 · p. 89 ↗$0.2 million
  • Technology Aides · action 3.13 · p. 88 ↗$0.1 million
  • Assessment and Accountability Structures · action 3.16 · p. 88 ↗under $0.1 million
  • GATE Program · action 3.17 · p. 88 ↗under $0.1 million
  • LTEL Liaiason · action 3.20 · p. 89 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Interpretation and translation services for families · action 3.5 · p. 88 ↗under $0.1 million
  • ELD Professional Learning · action 3.3 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • College and Career Readiness (6-8) Program · action 3.11 · p. 88 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Maintain Special Education Support · $4.0 million → $4.0 million · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • Student Acceleration Support (SAS) · $446,500 → $446,500 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Language Acquisition Support · $267,425 → $267,425 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Language Acquisition Classroom Support · $202,756 → $202,756 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Program Specialist · $189,952 → $189,952 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • Library Clerks · $165,970 → $165,970 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • STEAM/​PLTW Programs · $161,590 → $161,590 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • Language Arts and MTSS TOSA · $150,000 · p. 89 ↗new or renamed
  • Technology Aides · $77,155 → $77,155 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • Assessment and Accountability Structures · $35,000 → $35,000 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • GATE Program · $33,000 → $33,000 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • LTEL Liaiason · $25,000 · p. 89 ↗new or renamed
  • Interpretation and translation services for families · $13,000 → $13,000 · p. 88 ↗unchanged
  • ELD Professional Learning · $6,500 → $6,500 · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • College and Career Readiness (6-8) Program · $3,000 → $3,000 · p. 88 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 21 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 35 ↗.

Goal 4Community Engagement$1.5 million5% of action budgets

“We assure that all members of the WUSD community are respected as partners in education and that a diverse, inclusive, and equitable organization provides a foundation for all members of the WUSD community” p. 53 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.5 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. Site-based Socio-Emotional Services$929,818action 4.2 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Increased Student Wellness and Safety Support$199,310action 4.1 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Community Outreach$180,000action 4.11 · p. 90 ↗
  4. Student Wellness and Safety Professional Learning$150,000action 4.4 · p. 89 ↗
  5. Attendance Support$30,000action 4.7 · p. 89 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Community of Respect and Empathy (CORE) Committee · action 4.3 · p. 89 ↗$27,500
  • Systems of Accountability · action 4.9 · p. 89 ↗$17,000
  • Family Outreach Support · action 4.6 · p. 89 ↗$6,500
  • Educational Partner Partnerships Outreach · action 4.10 · p. 90 ↗$1,500

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Site-based Socio-Emotional Services · $929,818 → $929,818 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Increased Student Wellness and Safety Support · $199,310 → $199,310 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Community Outreach · $180,000 → $180,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Student Wellness and Safety Professional Learning · $150,000 → $150,000 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Attendance Support · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Community of Respect and Empathy (CORE) Committee · $27,500 → $27,500 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Systems of Accountability · $17,000 → $17,000 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Family Outreach Support · $6,500 → $6,500 · p. 89 ↗unchanged
  • Educational Partner Partnerships Outreach · $1,500 → $1,500 · p. 90 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 53 ↗.

Goal 5Organizational Strength$17.5 million57% of action budgets

“We assure WUSD will manage the District with prudent and effective organizational practices and systems. Wiseburn commits to maintaining a strong fiscal position that supports advancement of our commitments” p. 68 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $17.5 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. Certificated Staff$11.7 millionaction 5.8 · p. 90 ↗
  2. Classified Staff$5.7 millionaction 5.9 · p. 90 ↗
  3. Professional Staffing and Induction Staff Supportunder $0.1 millionaction 5.11 · p. 90 ↗
  4. Accounting & Audit System Implementationunder $0.1 millionaction 5.1 · p. 90 ↗
  5. Staff Technology Supportunder $0.1 millionaction 5.3 · p. 90 ↗

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Staff Wellness Support · action 5.12 · p. 90 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Educational Recruitment and Staffing · action 5.10 · p. 90 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Teacher Evaluation Process · action 5.13 · p. 90 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Student Achievement School Allocation · action 5.4 · p. 90 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Provide and maintain classroom technology and infrastructure · action 5.2 · p. 90 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Certificated Staff · $11.7 million → $11.7 million · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Classified Staff · $5.7 million → $5.7 million · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Staffing and Induction Staff Support · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Accounting & Audit System Implementation · $26,384 → $26,384 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Staff Technology Support · $19,000 → $19,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Staff Wellness Support · $7,000 → $7,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Educational Recruitment and Staffing · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Teacher Evaluation Process · $3,500 → $3,500 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Student Achievement School Allocation · $3,000 → $3,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged
  • Provide and maintain classroom technology and infrastructure · $1,000 → $1,000 · p. 90 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 13 measures · 1 quoted

  • % of qualifying beginning teachers were provided with induction support [ p. 71 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 100% of qualifying beginning teachers were provided with induction support.
    Target for year 3
    100% of qualifying beginning teachers provided with induction support.

12 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 5,099 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 52%2. White: 15%3. Black or African American: 15%4. Two or more races: 8%5. Asian: 5%6. Not reported: 2%7. Filipino: 2%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino52%
  2. White15%
  3. Black or African American15%
  4. Two or more races8%
  5. Asian5%
  6. Not reported2%
  7. Filipino2%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

40%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,813 of 4,579 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Wiseburn Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 57% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (60 of 106 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Wiseburn Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Aviation Elementary, 78th percentile (Strong). Middle: Da Vinci Connect, 85th percentile (Strong). High: Da Vinci Science, 89th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Wiseburn Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Wiseburn Unified good?

Wiseburn Unified’s 3 public elementary schools run from the 57th to the 78th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Strong and 1 Solid. Wiseburn Unified’s 2 public middle schools run from the 72nd to the 85th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 1 Solid. Wiseburn Unified’s 4 public high schools run from the 38th to the 89th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 2 Solid and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Wiseburn Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Wiseburn Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average high school in Wiseburn Unified had 14 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Wiseburn Unified spend per student?

Wiseburn Unified spent $17,467 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Wiseburn Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Wiseburn Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $30.8 million into 49 funded actions in 5 goals, 66% of its $46.3 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $17.5 million, 57% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Wiseburn Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.