School district · Alameda County

Pleasanton Unified schools

Pleasanton Unified’s 9 public elementary schools all sit between the 75th and the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 9 schools

from 75th to 99th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Walnut Grove Elementary: 99th percentile, Strong
  • Henry P. Mohr Elementary: 98th percentile, Strong
  • Fairlands Elementary: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Lydiksen Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Phoebe Apperson Hearst Elementary: 91st percentile, Strong
  • Donlon Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Vintage Hills Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Alisal Elementary: 86th percentile, Strong
  • Valley View Elementary: 75th percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
9Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 4 schools

from 84th to 99th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • The Pleasanton Virtual Academy: 99th percentile, Strong
  • Harvest Park Middle: 97th percentile, Strong
  • Thomas S. Hart Middle: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Pleasanton Middle: 84th percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
4Strong

High · 2 schools

from 93rd to 96th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Amador Valley High: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Foothill High: 93rd percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
2Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Pleasanton Unified

16 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Pleasanton Unified score highest?

Walnut Grove Elementary is highest, at the 99th percentile.

That’s higher than 99 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Pleasanton Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 6 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Pleasanton Unified had 8 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Pleasanton Unified score highest?

The Pleasanton Virtual Academy is highest, at the 99th percentile.

That’s higher than 99 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Pleasanton Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 1 middle school
Context

The average middle school in Pleasanton Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Pleasanton Unified score highest?

Amador Valley High is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Pleasanton Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

1 high school not ranked statewide
  • Village HighContinuation high school: compared only with other continuation schools

The district

Where does Pleasanton Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Pleasanton Unified spent $17,441 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Pleasanton Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction66%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$7.1 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 29 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 3% of its $221.7 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 202 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 45% of the money. The plan itself puts 92% of it toward staff.

  • Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED] $1.4 million
  • Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated $1.3 million
  • Integration Specialists-Certificated $534,261
  • 26 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

10 of the plan’s 29 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.4 million
  • Catch-up help $2.1 million
  • English learners $1.5 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED]$1.4 million
  • Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated$1.3 million
  • Reading Intervention Support Specialists (RISS)- Classified$371,077
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth) and what changed
For high-need students

It plans $5.3 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $5.0 million and estimates it spent $5.2 million, $0.2 million (5%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $337,056 (5%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. We couldn’t match $4.2 million of this $7.1 million plan to individual actions in last year’s plan. These lists cover the rest.

Largest cuts

  • Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated−⁠$939,571
  • Reading Intervention Support Specialists (RISS)- Classified−⁠$208,334
  • Integration Specialists-Certificated−⁠$148,992

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED]$1.4 million
  • Parent Liaison-Classified$531,653
  • Coordinator of Accountability and Special Programs & Coordinator of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment$438,293

Ask: What did Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $939,571 less?

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED] · $1,395,000
  • Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated · $1,268,319
  • Integration Specialists-Certificated · $534,261
The full plan5 goals, 44 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($7.1 million).

Where does the money go?

41% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G4
G5

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Provide opportunities for each student to access resources, programs, and instructional services that are…$2.7 million39% of action budgets

“Provide opportunities for each student to access resources, programs, and instructional services that are personalized, engaging, and value the strengths that our diverse population of students bring to our classrooms” p. 15 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.1 million (+⁠$1.7 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED]$1.4 millionaction 1.5 · p. 157 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Coordinator of Accountability and Special Programs & Coordinator of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment$0.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 157 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $262,975 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. New LREBG Funding [Proposed]$0.3 millionaction 1.12 · p. 159 ↗
  4. District College & Career Readiness Specialist-Certificated$0.2 millionaction 1.6 · p. 158 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $51,155 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. NEW ACTION Support for Credit Recovery$0.1 millionaction 1.14 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • A-G Counselor to Support Unduplicated Students · action 1.11 · p. 158 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $111,792 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Assessment Analyst-Classified · action 1.4 · p. 157 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $69,403 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Internet Access and Connectivity Support (NEW ACTION) · action 1.13 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Secondary Supplemental Curriculum Resources for English Learners, Long-Term English Learners and Newcomer Students [REINSTATED action) · action 1.10 · p. 158 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • College Boot Camp Academy · action 1.9 · p. 158 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. District College & Career Readiness Specialist-Certificated+⁠$12,460$158,057 → $170,517 · p. 158 ↗
  2. Assessment Analyst-Classified−⁠$439$139,244 → $138,805 · p. 157 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Sections for Secondary English Language Development [REINSTATED] · $1.4 million · p. 157 ↗new or renamed
  • Coordinator of Accountability and Special Programs & Coordinator of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment · $438,293 · p. 157 ↗new or renamed
  • New LREBG Funding [Proposed] · $256,471 → $256,471 · p. 159 ↗unchanged
  • NEW ACTION Support for Credit Recovery · $144,408 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • A-G Counselor to Support Unduplicated Students · $139,740 · p. 158 ↗new or renamed
  • Internet Access and Connectivity Support (NEW ACTION) · $27,500 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • Secondary Supplemental Curriculum Resources for English Learners, Long-Term English Learners and Newcomer Students [REINSTATED action) · $19,000 · p. 158 ↗new or renamed
  • College Boot Camp Academy · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 158 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 17 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 15 ↗.

Goal 2Monitor and enhance intervention and support structures to improve the physical, mental and social wellness…$2.9 million41% of action budgets

“Monitor and enhance intervention and support structures to improve the physical, mental and social wellness of students, families, and staff” p. 42 ↗

12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.0 million (−⁠$1.1 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated$1.3 millionaction 2.1 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $920,223 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Reading Intervention Support Specialists (RISS)- Classified$0.4 millionaction 2.6 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $247,385 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. District Social Workers-Certificated$0.3 millionaction 2.3 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $210,375 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Child Welfare Attendance Specialist-Classified (MODIFIED Action)$0.3 millionaction 2.4 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Support for development of targeted intervention plans$0.2 millionaction 2.7 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • World Dance Program [Revised] · action 2.5 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $40,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Youth Development Specialist for Newcomer English Learners · action 2.2 · p. 159 ↗$0.1 million
  • NEW ACTION Youth & Family Liaison · action 2.10 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Targeted Community & Tutoring Support (Revised) · action 2.8 · p. 159 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Supporting African American & Hispanic Students (Modified Action) · action 2.9 · p. 160 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Secondary Intervention Scheduling Program · action 2.11 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Social Emotional Curriculum · action 2.12 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $32,000 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Elementary and Secondary Intervention Specialists-Certificated−⁠$0.9 million$2.2 million → $1.3 million · p. 159 ↗
  2. Reading Intervention Support Specialists (RISS)- Classified−⁠$208,334$579,411 → $371,077 · p. 159 ↗
  3. Youth Development Specialist for Newcomer English Learners+⁠$4,250$85,000 → $89,250 · p. 159 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • District Social Workers-Certificated · $293,231 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • Child Welfare Attendance Specialist-Classified (MODIFIED Action) · $259,401 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • Support for development of targeted intervention plans · $246,000 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • World Dance Program [Revised] · $100,000 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • NEW ACTION Youth & Family Liaison · $85,262 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed
  • Targeted Community & Tutoring Support (Revised) · $75,000 · p. 159 ↗new or renamed
  • Supporting African American & Hispanic Students (Modified Action) · $50,000 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed
  • Secondary Intervention Scheduling Program · $38,500 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed
  • Social Emotional Curriculum · $35,768 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 14 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 42 ↗.

Goal 3Address historic and systemic barriers to diversity, equity, and inclusion by working collaboratively and…$67,0371% of action budgets

“Address historic and systemic barriers to diversity, equity, and inclusion by working collaboratively and strategically with community and educational partners to achieve an inclusive, equity-centered culture” p. 66 ↗

1 funded action · 2025–26 plan: $117,037 (−⁠$50,000)

Largest funded actions

  1. Implement Equity Plan [Modified]$67,037action 3.1 · p. 160 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Implement Equity Plan [Modified]−⁠$50,000$117,037 → $67,037 · p. 160 ↗

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 66 ↗.

Goal 4Promote a professional culture that leverages collaboration and interest-based problem solving in order to…$799,51111% of action budgets

“Promote a professional culture that leverages collaboration and interest-based problem solving in order to recruit, develop and retain a culturally responsive and highly qualified workforce” p. 75 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $777,775 (+⁠$21,736)

Largest funded actions

  1. Integration Specialists-Certificated$534,261action 4.1 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $314,565 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. High Quality Professional Development (MODIFIED ACTIONS)$120,000action 4.2 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Teacher Induction Support$120,000action 4.6 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $50,000 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Dual Language Immersion Curriculum Development and Alignment and Spanish Language Arts/​Dual Language Immersion Pilot$25,250action 4.4 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Integration Specialists-Certificated−⁠$148,992$683,253 → $534,261 · p. 160 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • High Quality Professional Development (MODIFIED ACTIONS) · $120,000 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed
  • Teacher Induction Support · $120,000 · p. 161 ↗new or renamed
  • Dual Language Immersion Curriculum Development and Alignment and Spanish Language Arts/​Dual Language Immersion Pilot · $25,250 · p. 160 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 1 quoted

  • Priority 2: California State Standard Implementation p. 76 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 All staff will continue to have opportunities for high quality professional development …
    Target for year 3
    2026-2027 All staff will continue to have opportunities for high quality professional development …

2 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5Provide service to the community that includes multi-directional communication and efforts to promote…$576,6538% of action budgets

“Provide service to the community that includes multi-directional communication and efforts to promote authentic engagement and effective partnerships” p. 86 ↗

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $818,125 (−⁠$241,472)

Largest funded actions

  1. Parent Liaison-Classified$531,653action 5.1 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Parent/​Guardian Translation and Interpretation Services [REINSTATED Action]$45,000action 5.2 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Parent Liaison-Classified · $531,653 · p. 161 ↗new or renamed
  • Parent/​Guardian Translation and Interpretation Services [REINSTATED Action] · $45,000 · p. 161 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 86 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 13,338 students
1. Asian: 54%2. White: 25%3. Hispanic or Latino: 11%4. Two or more races: 6%5. Black or African American: 2%6. Filipino: 2%7. Not reported: 1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Asian54%
  2. White25%
  3. Hispanic or Latino11%
  4. Two or more races6%
  5. Black or African American2%
  6. Filipino2%
  7. Not reported1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

10%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,336 of 13,302 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Pleasanton Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 51% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (355 of 701 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

3 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Phoebe Apperson Hearst Elementary (Targeted support) · Village High (Targeted support) · Vintage Hills Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Pleasanton Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Walnut Grove Elementary, 99th percentile (Strong). Middle: The Pleasanton Virtual Academy, 99th percentile (Strong). High: Amador Valley High, 96th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Pleasanton Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Pleasanton Unified good?

Pleasanton Unified’s 9 public elementary schools run from the 75th to the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 9 Strong. Pleasanton Unified’s 4 public middle schools run from the 84th to the 99th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong. Pleasanton Unified’s 2 public high schools run from the 93rd to the 96th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 2 Strong. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Pleasanton Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Pleasanton Unified had 8 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Pleasanton Unified had 6 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Pleasanton Unified spend per student?

Pleasanton Unified spent $17,441 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 66 cents of every Pleasanton Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Pleasanton Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $7.1 million into 29 funded actions in 5 goals, 3% of its $221.7 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $2.9 million, 41% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Pleasanton Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.