Of Jurupa Unified’s 17 public elementary schools, 14 sit between the 12th and the 37th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).
Elementary · 17 schools
from 4th to 38th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests
Indian Hills Elementary: 38th percentile, Developing
Camino Real Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
West Riverside Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
Stone Avenue Elementary: 34th percentile, Developing
Peralta Elementary: 33rd percentile, Developing
Del Sol Academy: 30th percentile, Developing
Sky Country Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
Glen Avon Elementary: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
Granite Hill Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
Van Buren Elementary: 18th percentile, Needs Support
Rustic Lane Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
Troth Street Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
Ina Arbuckle Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
Pedley Elementary: 12th percentile, Needs Support
Mission Bell Elementary: 10th percentile, Needs Support
Pacific Avenue Academy of Music: 4th percentile, Needs Support
9Needs Support
8Developing
0Solid
0Strong
← lower percentilehigher →
One dot per school.
Middle and high school pictures
Middle · 4 schools
from 6th to 29th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests
Jurupa Middle: 29th percentile, Developing
Del Sol Academy: 29th percentile, Developing
Mira Loma Middle: 14th percentile, Needs Support
Mission Middle: 6th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
2Developing
0Solid
0Strong
High · 3 schools
from 23rd to 52nd · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests
Patriot High: 52nd percentile, Solid
Jurupa Valley High: 36th percentile, Developing
Rubidoux High: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
0Strong
← lower percentilehigher →
One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 23 ranked schools teaches two levels, so it appears in more than one picture.
The average elementary school in Jurupa Unified had 20 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.
Middle schools
Which middle schools in Jurupa Unified score highest?
Jurupa Middle and Del Sol Academy are highest, both at the 29th percentile.
That’s higher than 29 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).
Highest in Jurupa Unified
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
The average middle school in Jurupa Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.
High schools
Which high schools in Jurupa Unified score highest?
Patriot High is highest, at the 52nd percentile.
That’s higher than 52 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).
Highest in Jurupa Unified
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
The average high school in Jurupa Unified had 30 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.
Where does Jurupa Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?
Jurupa Unified spent $20,465 per student in the 2024–25 school year.
That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Jurupa Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.
Spending by function
Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.
Share by function, 2024–25
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other2%
Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.
What the district plans
$86.6 million
planned in its 2026–27 plan for 25 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 24% of its $353.7 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.
The plan in short
Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 181 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
Three actions take 39% of the money. The plan itself puts 89% of it toward staff.
Reducing Class Sizes through Grade Span Adjustment $13.5 million
College and Career Readiness $10.4 million
Dual Immersion $9.5 million
22 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help
3 of the plan’s 25 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
Actions whose titles name English learners
English learners $2.0 million
Largest of these
English Learner Services$1.7 million
English Learner Progress and Academic Language Supports$245,277
Long Term English Learners (LTEL)$64,081
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students
It plans $69.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $67.8 million and estimates it spent $67.6 million, within 1% of the plan.
$67.6 million spent (estimated)$67.8 million planned
What changed
The total is $1.1 million (1%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Supplemental Transportation, which went from $856,964 to $2.1 million.
Largest cuts
Multi-Tiered System of Supports−$1.2 million
Professional Development−$629,687
Reducing Class Sizes through Grade Span Adjustment−$537,833
Largest increases
Supplemental Transportation+$1.3 million
College and Career Readiness+$459,388
New in the 2026–27 plan
English Learner Progress and Academic Language Supports$245,277
Ask: What did Multi-Tiered System of Supports pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $1.2 million less?
What its goals measure
Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure
2024–25
2025–26
Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
30%
32%
up 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
19%
21%
up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2
26 in 100
24 in 100
2 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2
2.3%
2.6%
up 0.3 pts
Goal 4 tracks named schools and Goal 3 tracks other measures, so they aren’t shown here.
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The plan’s own titles and amounts
Reducing Class Sizes through Grade Span Adjustment · $13,472,790
College and Career Readiness · $10,447,727
Dual Immersion · $9,511,358
The full plan4 goals, 42 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($86.6 million).
Where does the money go?
81% to Goal 1, All students will be college and career ready. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1All students will be college and career ready$70.5 million81% of action budgets
15 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $71.7 million (−$1.2 million) · p. 31 ↗
Largest funded actions
Reducing Class Sizes through Grade Span Adjustment$13.5 millionaction 1.6 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
College and Career Readiness$10.4 millionaction 1.9 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.9 million is state funding counted toward those services
Dual Immersion$9.5 millionaction 1.13 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Elementary Supplemental Supports$8.3 millionaction 1.7 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $5.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)$7.0 millionaction 1.3 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
10 more funded actions in this goal
School Site Allocation · action 1.15 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.8 million is state funding counted toward those services$6.9 million
Education and Information Technology · action 1.4 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.7 million
Secondary Supplemental Supports · action 1.8 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.9 million is state funding counted toward those services$3.5 million
Professional Preparation and Collaboration Time · action 1.5 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.3 million
English Learner Services · action 1.11 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $903,728 is state funding counted toward those services$1.7 million
Professional Development · action 1.2 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $296,165 is state funding counted toward those services$1.1 million
Student Learning, Monitoring and Feedback · action 1.14 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $652,764 is state funding counted toward those services$0.9 million
Standards Aligned Curriculum · action 1.1 · p. 139 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
Foster Youth and Students Experiencing Homelessness Support Services · action 1.10 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $223,897 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
Long Term English Learners (LTEL) · action 1.12 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Professional Development−$0.6 million$1.7 million → $1.1 million · p. 139 ↗
Reducing Class Sizes through Grade Span Adjustment−$0.5 million$14.0 million → $13.5 million · p. 139 ↗
College and Career Readiness+$0.5 million$10.0 million → $10.4 million · p. 140 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Dual Immersion · $9.6 million → $9.5 million · p. 140 ↗−$0.1 million
Elementary Supplemental Supports · $8.2 million → $8.3 million · p. 139 ↗+$5,929
Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA) · $7.0 million → $7.0 million · p. 139 ↗−$16,389
School Site Allocation · $6.9 million → $6.9 million · p. 140 ↗−$0.1 million
Education and Information Technology · $3.7 million → $3.7 million · p. 139 ↗+$6,100
Secondary Supplemental Supports · $3.7 million → $3.5 million · p. 139 ↗−$0.2 million
Professional Preparation and Collaboration Time · $3.2 million → $3.3 million · p. 139 ↗+$0.1 million
English Learner Services · $1.7 million → $1.7 million · p. 140 ↗−$17,867
Student Learning, Monitoring and Feedback · $885,776 → $905,332 · p. 140 ↗+$19,556
Foster Youth and Students Experiencing Homelessness Support Services · $233,502 → $240,090 · p. 140 ↗+$6,588
Long Term English Learners (LTEL) · $222,694 → $64,081 · p. 140 ↗−$158,613
How the plan measures it · 22 measures · 3 quoted
Percentage of students completing UC/CSU Entrance Requirements (A-G) and CTE program(s)p. 48 ↗
Baseline
All Students: 16.8% met UC/CSU requirements and completed at least one …
Target for year 3
All Students: 19.8% met UC/CSU requirements and completed at least one …
Percentage of students completing UC/CSU Entrance Requirements (A-G)p. 49 ↗
Baseline
All Students: 38.1% met UC/CSU requirements -Socioeconomically …
Target for year 3
All Students: 41.1% met UC/CSU requirements - …
Percentage of students completing CTE program(s)p. 50 ↗
Baseline
All Students: 33.7% completed at least one Career Technical Education (CTE) …
Target for year 3
All Students: 41% completed at least one Career Technical Education (CTE) …
19 more measures in the plan’s table.
Goal 2All students will have a safe, orderly, and inviting learning environment$13.9 million16% of action budgets
4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $13.9 million (+$60,726) · p. 80 ↗
Largest funded actions
Student Wellness and Safety$7.4 millionaction 2.4 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Multi-Tiered System of Supports$2.4 millionaction 2.2 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
Supplemental Transportation$2.1 millionaction 2.1 · p. 140 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Athletics Program$2.0 millionaction 2.3 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Supplemental Transportation+$1.3 million$0.9 million → $2.1 million · p. 140 ↗
Multi-Tiered System of Supports−$1.2 million$3.7 million → $2.4 million · p. 141 ↗
Athletics Program+$15,600$2.0 million → $2.0 million · p. 141 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Student Wellness and Safety · $7.4 million → $7.4 million · p. 141 ↗+$1,822
All Students: 2.7% suspended at least one day (Yellow) -Socioeconomically …
Target for year 3
All Students: 1.8% suspended at least one day (Green) - …
7 more measures in the plan’s table.
Goal 3All students will feel connected to their school community through engaging educational practices and…$1.8 million2% of action budgets
“All students will feel connected to their school community through engaging educational practices and partnerships with parents and the community” p. 102 ↗
4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.8 million (unchanged)
Largest funded actions
Communication Outreach$547,582action 3.3 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Parent Center$543,592action 3.2 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Parent Involvement and Community Outreach (PICO)$505,653action 3.4 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Parent and Community Opportunities$161,815action 3.1 · p. 141 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $146,063 is state funding counted toward those services
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Communication Outreach · $547,582 → $547,582 · p. 141 ↗unchanged
Parent Center · $543,592 → $543,592 · p. 141 ↗unchanged
Parent Involvement and Community Outreach (PICO) · $505,653 → $505,653 · p. 141 ↗unchanged
Parent and Community Opportunities · $161,815 → $161,815 · p. 141 ↗unchanged
How the plan measures it · 8 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 102 ↗.
Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy the end of the 2026-27 school year, Nueva Vista Continuation High School will improve outcomes in the…$441,6491% of action budgets
“By the end of the 2026-27 school year, Nueva Vista Continuation High School will improve outcomes in the English Learner Progress Indicator (ELPI) and Graduation Rate for All Students, English Learners (EL), Long-Term English Learners (LTEL), Socioeconomically Disadvantaged students, and Hispanic students, as measured by improvement in Dashboard performance levels” p. 114 ↗
2 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan
Largest funded actions
English Learner Progress and Academic Language Supports$245,277action 4.1 · p. 141 ↗
Graduation Readiness, Attendance, and Case Management Supports$196,372action 4.2 · p. 141 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
English Learner Progress and Academic Language Supports · $245,277 · p. 141 ↗new or renamed
Graduation Readiness, Attendance, and Case Management Supports · $196,372 · p. 141 ↗new or renamed
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends
Student mix
2024–25 · October enrollment count, 17,815 students
1Hispanic or Latino86%
2White7%
3Black or African American2%
4Asian2%
5Not reported1%
6Two or more races<1%
7Filipino<1%
8American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
9Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.
Free or reduced-price meals
78%
Across California, 63% of students qualify.
2024–25 · 13,905 of 17,739 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.
The district’s state records
Is the state giving the district extra help?
The state is giving Jurupa Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.
How English learners moved up on the state’s English test
From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 43% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,682 of 3,883 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.
Which public schools in Jurupa Unified rank highest?
Elementary: Indian Hills Elementary, 38th percentile (Developing). Middle: 2 schools at the 29th percentile (Developing): Jurupa Middle and Del Sol Academy. High: Patriot High, 52nd percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
Does living in the Jurupa Unified district decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)
Are the public schools in Jurupa Unified good?
Jurupa Unified’s 17 public elementary schools run from the 4th to the 38th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 8 Developing and 9 Needs Support. Jurupa Unified’s 4 public middle schools run from the 6th to the 29th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Developing and 2 Needs Support. Jurupa Unified’s 3 public high schools run from the 23rd to the 52nd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.
How does chronic absence in Jurupa Unified compare with California?
The average elementary school in Jurupa Unified had 20 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Jurupa Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Jurupa Unified had 30 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.
How much does Jurupa Unified spend per student?
Jurupa Unified spent $20,465 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Jurupa Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.
What is in Jurupa Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?
The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $86.6 million into 25 funded actions in 4 goals, 24% of its $353.7 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $70.5 million, 81% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.
Sources and methodology
This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Jurupa Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school
Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.