School district · Orange County

Buena Park Elementary schools

Buena Park Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 5 public elementary schools run from the 20th to the 95th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 5 schools

from 20th to 95th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Charles G. Emery Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Arthur F. Corey Elementary: 53rd percentile, Solid
  • Mabel L. Pendleton Elementary: 41st percentile, Developing
  • Carl E. Gilbert Elementary: 32nd percentile, Developing
  • James A. Whitaker Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
2Developing
1Solid
1Strong

Middle · 2 schools

from 42nd to 68th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Gordon H. Beatty Middle: 68th percentile, Solid
  • Buena Park Middle: 42nd percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

Schools around the Buena Park Elementary district

7 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Buena Park Elementary district score highest?

Charles G. Emery Elementary is highest, at the 95th percentile.

That’s higher than 95 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Buena Park Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 2 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the Buena Park Elementary district had 15 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Buena Park Elementary district score highest?

Gordon H. Beatty Middle is highest, at the 68th percentile.

That’s higher than 68 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Buena Park Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

The district

Where does Buena Park Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Buena Park Elementary district spent $22,750 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Buena Park Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction60%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration9%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%
  • Other6%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$24.1 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 44 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 27% of its $89.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 192 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 45% of the money. The plan itself puts 83% of it toward staff.

  • District Support Services $7.4 million
  • Class Size Reduction $1.8 million
  • Learning Recovery - Tier 3 Reading Intervention $1.6 million
  • 41 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

5 of the plan’s 44 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $1.6 million
  • Math $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $2.5 million
  • English learners under $0.1 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Learning Recovery - Tier 3 Reading Intervention$1.6 million
  • Tier 2 Intervention$917,107
  • Math Professional Development$70,000
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $14.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $13.8 million and estimates it spent $14.1 million, $0.3 million (3%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $171,622 (1%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Transportation, which went from $1.1 million to $1.4 million.

Largest cuts

  • Continuum of Mental Health Support Staff−⁠$283,454
  • Specialized Staff−⁠$192,000
  • District Support Services−⁠$183,541

Largest increases

  • Transportation+⁠$349,900
  • Technology+⁠$284,201
  • Tier 2 Intervention+⁠$280,292

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Specialized Support Staff$352,788
  • Math Professional Development$70,000
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 143%45%up 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 136%37%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 417 in 10014 in 1003 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 41.4%1.9%up 0.5 pts

Goals 2 and 3 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • District Support Services · $7,365,337
  • Class Size Reduction · $1,810,310
  • Learning Recovery - Tier 3 Reading Intervention · $1,613,800
The full plan4 goals, 30 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($24.1 million).

Where does the money go?

63% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Develop critical competencies in ELA, math, and language proficiency using evidence-based instruction…$3.6 million15% of action budgets

“Develop critical competencies in ELA, math, and language proficiency using evidence-based instruction tailored to increase cognitive engagement for all students while diminishing disparities among subgroups, such as multilingual and multicultural learners, low-income students, students with disabilities, and foster youth” p. 23 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.5 million (+⁠$22,193)

Largest funded actions

  1. Learning Recovery - Tier 3 Reading Intervention$1.6 millionaction 1.7 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $77,099 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Professional Learning Communities$1.2 millionaction 1.10 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. ACCESS$0.3 millionaction 1.9 · p. 143 ↗
  4. Base Materials$0.2 millionaction 1.1 · p. 142 ↗
  5. iReady Diagnostic and Instruction$0.1 millionaction 1.2 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Math Professional Development · action 1.11 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • ELD Supplemental Materials · action 1.4 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Middle School Classroom Mathematics Materials · action 1.3 · p. 142 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Learning Recovery - Tier 3 Reading Intervention+⁠$0.1 million$1.6 million → $1.6 million · p. 142 ↗
  2. Professional Learning Communities+⁠$0.1 million$1.1 million → $1.2 million · p. 143 ↗
  3. ELD Supplemental Materials+⁠$20,000$10,000 → $30,000 · p. 142 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • ACCESS · $290,000 → $300,000 · p. 143 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • Base Materials · $213,000 → $223,000 · p. 142 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • iReady Diagnostic and Instruction · $148,622 → $136,202 · p. 142 ↗−⁠$12,420
  • Math Professional Development · $70,000 · p. 143 ↗new or renamed
  • Middle School Classroom Mathematics Materials · $27,000 → $27,000 · p. 142 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 23 ↗.

Goal 2Highly qualified staff will deliver standards-based instruction and support district systems designed to…$15.3 million63% of action budgets

“Highly qualified staff will deliver standards-based instruction and support district systems designed to increase cognitive engagement for all students, especially those with unique needs, within clean, well-maintained school facilities that foster a positive learning environment” p. 40 ↗

13 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $14.7 million (+⁠$530,215)

Largest funded actions

  1. District Support Services$7.4 millionaction 2.11 · p. 144 ↗
  2. Class Size Reduction$1.8 millionaction 2.3 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Transportation$1.4 millionaction 2.15 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Technology$1.2 millionaction 2.12 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Tier 2 Intervention$0.9 millionaction 2.10 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

8 more funded actions in this goal

  • Instructional Coaches · action 2.5 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Elementary PE Teachers · action 2.4 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Library Media Clerks · action 2.8 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Specialized Support Staff · action 2.1 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Kindergarten Support · action 2.6 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Ed. Services Division · action 2.9 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Systematic and Strategic Use of Data · action 2.13 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Early Learning Department · action 2.14 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Transportation+⁠$0.3 million$1.1 million → $1.4 million · p. 145 ↗
  2. Technology+⁠$0.3 million$0.9 million → $1.2 million · p. 144 ↗
  3. Tier 2 Intervention+⁠$280,292$636,815 → $917,107 · p. 144 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • District Support Services · $7.5 million → $7.4 million · p. 144 ↗−⁠$0.2 million
  • Class Size Reduction · $1.6 million → $1.8 million · p. 143 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Instructional Coaches · $530,594 → $528,255 · p. 143 ↗−⁠$2,339
  • Elementary PE Teachers · $507,362 → $497,563 · p. 143 ↗−⁠$9,799
  • Library Media Clerks · $436,886 → $394,751 · p. 144 ↗−⁠$42,135
  • Specialized Support Staff · $352,788 · p. 143 ↗new or renamed
  • Kindergarten Support · $337,369 → $333,258 · p. 144 ↗−⁠$4,111
  • Ed. Services Division · $136,164 → $254,851 · p. 144 ↗+⁠$118,687
  • Systematic and Strategic Use of Data · $188,791 → $197,568 · p. 144 ↗+⁠$8,777
  • Early Learning Department · $148,838 → $18,400 · p. 144 ↗−⁠$130,438

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 5 measures · 1 quoted

  • Access to Standards- aligned Instructional Materials p. 45 ↗
    Baseline
    100% per Fall, 2023 Williams
    Target for year 3
    Maintain 100%of having access to standards-aligned instructional materials

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Increase student outcomes through impactful instruction of core subjects and expand college and career pathway programs$1.2 million5% of action budgets

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.1 million (+⁠$105,585) · p. 52 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Outdoor Science Camp$261,400action 3.2 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. District Passion Programs / CTE Pathways$244,658action 3.4 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Outdoor Wellness Activities$204,353action 3.9 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Educational Programs$203,446action 3.11 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Elementary Music Instruction Teacher$93,940action 3.10 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Passion Programs /​CTE Pathways · action 3.3 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$67,500
  • STEM Instruction and PD · action 3.1 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$55,800
  • Alternative Learning Programs · action 3.8 · p. 145 ↗$45,000
  • GATE · action 3.5 · p. 145 ↗$44,350
  • GATE Scholar Program · action 3.6 · p. 145 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$7,500

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Outdoor Wellness Activities+⁠$185,683$18,670 → $204,353 · p. 145 ↗
  2. Elementary Music Instruction Teacher−⁠$84,441$178,381 → $93,940 · p. 146 ↗
  3. Educational Programs−⁠$63,215$266,661 → $203,446 · p. 146 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Outdoor Science Camp · $261,400 → $261,400 · p. 145 ↗unchanged
  • District Passion Programs / CTE Pathways · $216,890 → $244,658 · p. 145 ↗+⁠$27,768
  • Passion Programs /​CTE Pathways · $37,500 → $67,500 · p. 145 ↗+⁠$30,000
  • STEM Instruction and PD · $56,010 → $55,800 · p. 145 ↗−⁠$210
  • Alternative Learning Programs · $35,000 → $45,000 · p. 145 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • GATE · $44,350 → $44,350 · p. 145 ↗unchanged
  • GATE Scholar Program · $7,500 → $7,500 · p. 145 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 52 ↗.

Goal 4Promote emotional engagement and connectedness among students, families, and staff by fostering safe and…$4.0 million17% of action budgets

“Promote emotional engagement and connectedness among students, families, and staff by fostering safe and culturally responsive learning environments” p. 65 ↗

13 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.8 million (−⁠$829,615)

Largest funded actions

  1. Continuum of Mental Health Support Staff$939,307action 4.4 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Student and Community Services$576,401action 4.1 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Nurses and Health Services$539,814action 4.5 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Enhanced Condition of Learning$475,976action 4.9 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Student Engagement and Outreach Clerk$454,929action 4.2 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

8 more funded actions in this goal

  • Well-Maintained and Welcoming Campus Environment · action 4.16 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$293,656
  • Translation and Interpreting Services · action 4.8 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$196,846
  • Middle School Attendance Clerks · action 4.3 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$183,520
  • Middle School Guidance Specialist · action 4.12 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$168,942
  • Positive School Climate · action 4.13 · p. 147 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$70,200
  • Specialized Staff · action 4.17 · p. 147 ↗$55,000
  • Parent Workshops · action 4.6 · p. 146 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$26,000
  • Wellness Teacher on Special Assignment · action 4.15 · p. 147 ↗$15,771

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Continuum of Mental Health Support Staff−⁠$0.3 million$1.2 million → $0.9 million · p. 146 ↗
  2. Specialized Staff−⁠$192,000$247,000 → $55,000 · p. 147 ↗
  3. Nurses and Health Services−⁠$136,668$676,482 → $539,814 · p. 146 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Student and Community Services · $506,875 → $576,401 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$69,526
  • Enhanced Condition of Learning · $554,163 → $475,976 · p. 147 ↗−⁠$78,187
  • Student Engagement and Outreach Clerk · $429,671 → $454,929 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$25,258
  • Well-Maintained and Welcoming Campus Environment · $211,191 → $293,656 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$82,465
  • Translation and Interpreting Services · $196,846 → $196,846 · p. 147 ↗unchanged
  • Middle School Attendance Clerks · $162,891 → $183,520 · p. 146 ↗+⁠$20,629
  • Middle School Guidance Specialist · $156,733 → $168,942 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$12,209
  • Positive School Climate · $37,340 → $70,200 · p. 147 ↗+⁠$32,860
  • Parent Workshops · $30,000 → $26,000 · p. 146 ↗−⁠$4,000
  • Wellness Teacher on Special Assignment · $116,999 → $15,771 · p. 147 ↗−⁠$101,228

How the plan measures it · 12 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 65 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 3,685 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 65%2. Asian: 18%3. White: 5%4. Filipino: 4%5. Black or African American: 3%6. Two or more races: 3%7. Not reported: 1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino65%
  2. Asian18%
  3. White5%
  4. Filipino4%
  5. Black or African American3%
  6. Two or more races3%
  7. Not reported1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

80%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 2,952 of 3,675 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Buena Park Elementary isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 50% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (362 of 719 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Arthur F. Corey Elementary (Extra targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Buena Park Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Charles G. Emery Elementary, 95th percentile (Strong). Middle: Gordon H. Beatty Middle, 68th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Buena Park Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Buena Park Elementary district good?

Buena Park Elementary’s 5 public elementary schools run from the 20th to the 95th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 1 Solid, 2 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Buena Park Elementary’s 2 public middle schools run from the 42nd to the 68th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Buena Park Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Buena Park Elementary district had 15 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Buena Park Elementary district spend per student?

The Buena Park Elementary district spent $22,750 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Buena Park Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Buena Park Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $24.1 million into 44 funded actions in 4 goals, 27% of its $89.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $15.3 million, 63% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Buena Park Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.