ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Walteria Elementary · TorrancePublic

Walteria Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Walteria posts 57.6% exceeding the standard — versus 21.4% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

24456 Madison Street, 90505 (opens in new tab)·Torrance Unified·Torrance·Grades TK-5·650 students·17% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 533-4487·Website
Scope Score
79
Strong High Ceiling
ranked #106 statewide · #1 of 17 in Torrance Unified
296 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 86 tracked

Walteria Elementary scores 79 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 98th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

CDE CAASPP 2025

Most rating sites would stop at “83% proficient” and call it done. Walteria deserves a closer read. It sits at the 98th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Walteria's low-income kids hit 76.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The zoned path
  1. This school
    79/100Strong
    elementary scale
  2. Edward J. Richardson Middle
    75/100Strong
    middle scale
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7939
% Exceeded58%21%
% Met+83%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strong · p93Average · p50
Absence5.7%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 98th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Maintained)MathBlue(Maintained)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 83% of students meet the standard today, above the 77% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 372%77%71%71%67%
Grade 477%89%77%81%82%
Grade 579%94%88%85%90%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 378%81%95%82%83%
Grade 487%83%83%83%84%
Grade 568%85%86%82%90%

Where its students land

ELA
Exceeded 54%Met 25%Nearly Met 13%Not Met 8%
Math
Exceeded 60%Met 25%Nearly Met 10%Not Met 5%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded

The school, grade by grade

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

47%
20%
33%
Grade 3 · 67% proficient
50%
31%
19%
Grade 4 · 81% proficient
67%
22%
11%
Grade 5 · 89% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 20.1pp across grades; the floor rises 22.2pp. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

76.7%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Walteria's most underrated number

76.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Walteria low-income: 76.7%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
57.6%
State 21.4%
36.3pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
82.6%
State 42.7%
39.8pp above state avg
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
Strong
State average
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 90 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
5.7%
State 17.9%
12.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
28.6%
State 18.0%
10.6pp above state avg
The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
46%
exceeded standard · 71% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
67%
exceeded standard · 90% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do. The two measures land in the same neighbourhood here — ours puts this school around the 93rd percentile of California elementary schools, the state's around the 93rd in reading and math together. Two different methods agreeing is the most you can ask of one year of test data.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 93rd percentile among California elementary schools.93rd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 91st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.91st pctile · +16 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +24 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 96th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.96th pctile · +24 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Walteria Elementary in Torrance, 76.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Walteria Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 21.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (74.6% Math proficient); Asian students (81.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 60 students tested.

All students at this school: 82% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 82%, district —, state 43%82%
MaleMale: this school 83%, district 65%, state 42%83% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 82%, district 65%, state 44%82% · −1 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 85%, district 82%, state 72%85% · +2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 76%, district 66%, state 56%76% · −7 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 76%, district 51%, state 32%76% · −7 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 77%, district 49%, state 32%77% · −5 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 59%, district 31%, state 11%59% · −23 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 59%, district 32%, state 15%59% · −23 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 91%, district 74%, state 56%91% · +8 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 64.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.3pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only116 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +17 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 116 students.+17 pts · +14 vs typical
Asian79 studentsAsian, reading: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against +7 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 79 students.+12 pts · +5 vs typical
Low-income students45 studentsLow-income students, reading: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 45 students.+21 pts · +21 vs typical
White45 studentsWhite, reading: +14 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 45 students.+14 pts · +9 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students36 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +23 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 36 students.+23 pts · +22 vs typical
Math
English Only116 studentsEnglish Only, math: +19 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 116 students.+19 pts · +18 vs typical
Asian78 studentsAsian, math: +28 scale-score points versus expectation, against +16 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 78 students.+28 pts · +12 vs typical
Low-income students45 studentsLow-income students, math: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 45 students.+21 pts · +22 vs typical
White45 studentsWhite, math: +17 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 45 students.+17 pts · +12 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students36 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +17 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 36 students.+17 pts · +18 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 5 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 5.7%, district 9.4%, state 17.9%5.7% · −12.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −0.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.7%
TK/K5.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Walteria Elementary
79/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Planning ahead? 2 licensed preschools near this school →
South HighScope 74direct feeder

The road from this school ends at South High, which sent 82 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 24 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach South High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 84% of South High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

82 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 24 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT → full record on South High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 26:127:1
PrincipalSuzanne Guidi
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience20.1 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,009 – $122,300
Principal salary$154,486 – $196,119
Superintendent salary$335,280

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,626, CA average $14,491$16,626 · spent at this school
Federal share$11 per student

$11 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,002 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,441 per pupil
2019$11,279 per pupil
2018$11,194 per pupil
2017$10,632 per pupil
2016$10,442 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Asian40.6%
District 27.0% · CA 10.2%
White22.9%
District 18.5% · CA 19.9%
Other18.8%
District 15.7% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic16.6%
District 34.7% · CA 56.1%
Black1.1%
District 4.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 16.8% (47pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$116K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.20M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+60% · CA 35%
ZIP population35,148
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 78% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Walteria Elementary a good elementary school?

Walteria Elementary has a Scope Score of 79 out of 100, placing it in the 98th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #106 statewide. 57.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 36.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Walteria Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 82.6% of students at Walteria Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 57.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 57.6% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 591 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Walteria Elementary rank in California?

Walteria Elementary ranks #106 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 98th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Walteria Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Walteria Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California elementary schools — roughly the 93rd percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Walteria Elementary?

5.7% of students at Walteria Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Walteria Elementary compare to other schools in Torrance?

Walteria Elementary scores 79/100 (98th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 650 students. Use the schools in Torrance page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Walteria Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Walteria Elementary in Torrance, 76.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Walteria Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 21.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (74.6% Math proficient); Asian students (81.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 60 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

What middle school does Walteria Elementary feed into?

By attendance boundary, Walteria Elementary is zoned to Edward J. Richardson Middle. Edward J. Richardson Middle has a Scope Score of 75 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Your other options

All schools in Torrance →

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
57.6%
↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 85 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded · 23%
82.6%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 81 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) · 20%
Strong
↑ vs CA average · 93rd pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
5.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 70 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▲ 0.3pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 57 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▼ 0.2pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
28.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 65 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39547%20%18%15%67%+24
Grade 411550%31%12%6%82%+37
Grade 58667%22%7%3%90%+42
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39457%26%12%5%83%+38
Grade 411459%25%11%4%84%+43
Grade 58764%25%6%5%90%+55

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide8843%35%18%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6076.7%+21+38
Asian13481.3%−1+7
White6271.0%+1+9
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Walteria Elementary ←—7957.6%82.6%+14.4pp+90 pts0.7%
Cornerstone at Pedregal Elementary2.3 mi8968.3%91.2%+6.3pp—0.1%
Soleado Elementary2.2 mi7765.0%87.2%+2.8pp—0.5%
Anza Elementary2.6 mi7751.8%76.8%+6.7pp—0.4%
California average—3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20197091#48147.3%76.8%3.7%0.4%-2.1pp
20228498#11060.0%85.0%12.7%0.3%+10.6pp
20238097#18656.7%83.5%10.5%0.7%+4.2pp
20247797#15354.5%80.7%5.5%0.9%+7.1pp
20257998#10657.6%82.6%5.7%0.7%+14.4pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female3.7%3.9%+0.2pp
Male3.1%6.4%+3.3pp
Asian0.7%3.0%+2.3pp
Black/African American8.3%——
Filipino0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino6.8%13.3%+6.5pp
Two or More Races9.2%3.4%-5.8pp
White3.0%3.3%+0.3pp
Students with Disabilities6.1%14.4%+8.3pp
English Learners2.0%4.3%+2.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.4%11.9%+2.5pp
All Students3.4%5.1%+1.7pp
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+16192Accelerated+24191Exceptional
English Only+17116not categorised+19116not categorised
Asian+1279Accelerated+2878Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+2145Exceptional+2145Exceptional
White+1445Accelerated+1745Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino+2336Exceptional+1736Accelerated
English Learner+1533Accelerated+3132Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+1127Accelerated+226Average
Two or More Races+1621Accelerated+2621Exceptional
English Learners Only+519not categorised+2618not categorised
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+2314not categorised+3214not categorised
Filipino+2311Exceptional+2711Exceptional

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/walteria-elementary-3295"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Walteria Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-07methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

← Browse all schools