ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Township Elementary · Simi Valley

Township Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Township posts 53% meeting the standard, and 23.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

4101 Township Avenue, 93063 (opens in new tab)·Simi Valley Unified·Simi Valley·Grades TK-5·521 students·43% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(805) 520-6770·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4945
% Exceeded23%21%
% Met+53%43%
Growth+1.7-2.9
Absence12.8%17.9%
Suspension2.1%1.6%
Scope Score
49
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,965 statewide · #7 of 19 in Simi Valley Unified

Township Elementary scores 49 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “53% proficient” and call it done. Township deserves a closer read. The school sits in Simi Valley, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Township's low-income kids hit 49.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 33rd to the 66th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 53% of students meet the standard today, above the 48% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 354%42%55%49%49%
Grade 457%52%55%58%52%
Grade 544%52%32%53%63%
Grade 640%57%43%35%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 358%51%70%58%54%
Grade 456%48%44%64%60%
Grade 519%41%22%26%43%
Grade 634%47%34%20%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
33%
51%
Grade 3 · 49% proficient
26%
26%
48%
Grade 4 · 52% proficient
27%
36%
37%
Grade 5 · 63% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 10.7pp across grades; the floor rises 14.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

49.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Township's most underrated number

49.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Township low-income: 49.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
23.4%
State 21.3%
2.1pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+1.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
53.4%
State 42.7%
10.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.8%
State 17.9%
5.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
28.6%
State 18.0%
10.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Township Elementary in Simi Valley, 49.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Township Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.3% Math proficient); White students (60.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 104 students tested.

All students at this school: 53% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 53%, district —, state 43%53%
WhiteWhite: this school 60%, district 50%, state 56%60% · +7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 53%, district 44%, state 42%53% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 54%, district 43%, state 44%54% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 46%, district 32%, state 32%46% · −8 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 41%, district 31%, state 32%41% · −12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 19%, district 12%, state 15%19% · −35 vs school

7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.8%, district 19.5%, state 17.9%12.8% · −5.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.1%, district —, state 1.6%2.1% · +0.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.6%
TK/K11.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience18.7 years
Fully credentialed87%
Intern / emergency permit0.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,887 – $115,704
Principal salary$148,925 – $170,414
Superintendent salary$297,494

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $15,779, CA average $14,815$15,779 · spent at this school
Federal share$110 per student

$110 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,900 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction57%
Instruction support14%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,276 per pupil
2019$11,727 per pupil
2018$11,607 per pupil
2017$10,765 per pupil
2016$10,354 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White59.9%
District 38.8% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic30.1%
District 45.4% · CA 56.1%
Other5.2%
District 7.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.5%
District 7.2% · CA 10.2%
Black1.3%
District 1.6% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 43.2% (21pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$125K · CA $85K
Median home value$817K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+37% · CA 35%
ZIP population55,066
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 49% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Township Elementary a good elementary school?

Township Elementary has a Scope Score of 49 out of 100, placing it in the 66th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,965 statewide. 23.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.1 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Township Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 53.4% of students at Township Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 23.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 23.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 488 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Township Elementary rank in California?

Township Elementary ranks #1,965 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 66th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Township Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Township Elementary increases by 1.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Township Elementary?

12.8% of students at Township Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Township Elementary compare to other schools in Simi Valley?

Township Elementary scores 49/100 (66th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 521 students. Use the schools in Simi Valley page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Township Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Township Elementary in Simi Valley, 49.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Township Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.3% Math proficient); White students (60.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 104 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
23.4%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 52th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+1.7pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 49th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
53.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 58th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.8%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 58th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 46th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
28.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 65th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37616%33%32%20%49%+5
Grade 48526%26%24%25%52%+7
Grade 58327%36%27%11%63%+15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37620%34%25%21%54%+8
Grade 48528%32%22%18%60%+18
Grade 58324%19%28%29%43%+8
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/118215%34%44%7%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10449.0%+10+11
White14360.8%+4−1
Hispanic/Latino7342.5%+4+4
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Township Elementary ←4923.4%53.4%+1.72.1%
Vista Elementary2.3 mi7046.3%75.3%−10.60.7%
Big Springs Elementary0.8 mi6129.8%59.6%−16.50.1%
Garden Grove Elementary1.3 mi5518.0%45.4%+5.11.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193633#367521.4%48.0%8.0%2.9%-24.5pp
20224467#187121.5%47.8%30.6%2.2%+0.4pp
20232821#450017.0%46.4%20.9%2.7%-35.3pp
20244762#216423.9%51.4%16.5%1.8%-13.9pp
20254966#196523.4%53.4%12.8%2.1%+1.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.4%13.0%+4.6pp
Male7.4%12.2%+4.8pp
Asian22.2%10.5%-11.7pp
Hispanic/Latino10.1%20.0%+9.9pp
Two or More Races2.2%26.1%+23.9pp
Students with Disabilities13.3%14.9%+1.6pp
English Learners6.9%17.5%+10.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.8%16.5%+3.7pp
All Students7.9%12.5%+4.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction