Math
85%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Public elementary school
Tice Creek
High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
85% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 85% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
High Ceiling
What this means for your family
Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(925) 746-5515
DistrictWalnut Creek Elementary
PrincipalTyson Fechter
GradesK-8
Enrollment451 students
English
85%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
451Total enrollment
Chronic absence
9%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 72% | 77% |
| 2022 | 76% | 87% |
| 2023 | 77% | 82% |
| 2024 | 91% | 84% |
| 2025 | 85% | 85% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
61%ProficientStandard Met
24%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
8%MinimalStandard Not Met
8%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
62%ProficientStandard Met
23%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
12%MinimalStandard Not Met
3%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Has held the 96th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Most rating sites would stop at “84% proficient” and call it done. Tice Creek deserves a closer read. It sits at the 96th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: 59.1% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.4%.
292 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · no cohort tracked
Tice Creek scores 73 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 96th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 84% of students meet the standard today, above the 76% who did in 2019.
Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
ELABlue(Increased)MathBlue(Increased)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 77% | 98% | 82% | 74% | 86% |
| Grade 4 | 78% | 77% | 87% | 83% | 84% |
| Grade 5 | 76% | 76% | 83% | 93% | 83% |
| Grade 6 | 80% | 69% | 55% | 78% | 88% |
| Grade 7 | 77% | 80% | 75% | 78% | 78% |
| Grade 8 | 88% | 72% | 85% | 68% | 84% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 73% | 96% | 85% | 87% | 92% |
| Grade 4 | 78% | 72% | 90% | 79% | 82% |
| Grade 5 | 71% | 57% | 70% | 95% | 76% |
| Grade 6 | 73% | 63% | 57% | 69% | 87% |
| Grade 7 | 70% | 80% | 71% | 59% | 75% |
| Grade 8 | 87% | 72% | 64% | 60% | 63% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Four in five of students here meet the standard. More than half clear it by a lot.
ELA84% met or exceeded
Exceeded 51%Met 33%Nearly Met 13%Not Met 3%
Math80% met or exceeded
Exceeded 57%Met 23%Nearly Met 12%Not Met 8%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 73 | 59% | 84% | — | 9.0% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | — | 17.9% | 1.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope7339
% Exceeded59%21%
% Met+84%43%
Growth——
Absence9.0%17.9%
Suspension1.0%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model places it near the 78th percentile of elementary schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well above the middle of California elementary schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +9 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 76th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.76th pctile · +9 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 80th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.80th pctile · +12 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
How every group of students does here
At Tice Creek in Walnut Creek, 80.0% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 73.4% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Tice Creek outperforms its district average for white students by 6.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (74.1% Math proficient); Asian students (91.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.6 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 82% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 82%, district —, state 43%82%
FemaleFemale: this school 83%, district 71%, state 44%83% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 80%, district 68%, state 42%80% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 77%, district 73%, state 56%77% · −5 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 97%, district 73%, state 56%97% · +15 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 91%, district 78%, state 72%91% · +9 vs school
8 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
English Only171 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 171 students.+10 pts · +7 vs typical
White114 studentsWhite, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 114 students.+10 pts · +5 vs typical
Asian40 studentsAsian, reading: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against +7 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 40 students.+11 pts · +4 vs typical
Two or more races37 studentsTwo or more races, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against +7 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 37 students.+10 pts · +3 vs typical
Math
English Only171 studentsEnglish Only, math: +13 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 171 students.+13 pts · +12 vs typical
White114 studentsWhite, math: +7 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 114 students.+7 pts · +2 vs typical
Asian40 studentsAsian, math: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against +16 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 40 students.+21 pts · +5 vs typical
Two or more races37 studentsTwo or more races, math: +15 scale-score points versus expectation, against +7 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 37 students.+15 pts · +8 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 5 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 21 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher21 · district 23
Teaching staff26 teachers
Avg. experience13.2 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers4%
PrincipalTyson Fechter
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$60,927 – $119,573
Principal salaryFrom $185,087
Superintendent salary$258,247
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 7–8 students (15.8% vs 6.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.0%, district 10.0%, state 17.9%9.0% · −8.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.0%, district —, state 1.6%1.0% · −0.6pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.4%
Grades 7–86.1%
TK/K15.8%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $16,375 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$44 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,375, CA average $14,491$16,375 · spent at this school
Federal share$44 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,656 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 64%Instruction support 13%Student services 9%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 9%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,522 per pupil
2019$11,294 per pupil
2018$11,373 per pupil
2017$11,430 per pupil
2016$10,437 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
8% of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
On the state's science test (CAST), 60% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino11.1% · district 16.6% · CA 56.1%
White44.4% · district 46.8% · CA 19.9%
Asian18.2% · district 15.5% · CA 10.2%
Black1.6% · district 2.4% · CA 4.8%
Other24.8% · district 18.7% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch7.5% · CA 64%
Median income$101K · CA $85K
Median home value$861K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+70% · CA 35%
ZIP population16,988
Median age69 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tice Creek | Public | Strong | 59% | 84% | School being viewed | |
| Burton Valley Elementary | Public | Strong | 55% | 82% | 2.2 mi | |
| Alamo Elementary | Public | Strong | 57% | 86% | 2.4 mi | |
| Springhill Elementary | Public | Strong | 59% | 84% | 2.4 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Walnut Creek Elementary.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Tice Creek a good elementary school?
Tice Creek has a Scope Score of 73 out of 100, placing it in the 96th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #245 statewide. 59.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 37.8 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Tice Creek's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 84.0% of students at Tice Creek met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 59.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 59.1% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 286 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Tice Creek rank in California?
Tice Creek ranks #245 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 96th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Tice Creek?
9.0% of students at Tice Creek are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Tice Creek compare to other schools in Walnut Creek?
Tice Creek scores 73/100 (96th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 451 students. Use the schools in Walnut Creek page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Tice Creek serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Tice Creek in Walnut Creek, 80.0% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 73.4% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Tice Creek outperforms its district average for white students by 6.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (74.1% Math proficient); Asian students (91.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.6 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Tice Creek feed into?
By attendance boundary, Tice Creek is zoned to Walnut Creek Intermediate. Walnut Creek Intermediate has a Scope Score of 62 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
How far the top scorers get carries this score.
59.1% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.4%.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 59.1% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 84.0% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 9.0% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.0% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 28.6% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -9.2pp | -2.9pp | — |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Tice Creek: reading the evidence
Tice Creek posts 59.1% exceeding the standard — versus 21.4% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Tice Creek is ranked #245 statewide · #1 of 6 in Walnut Creek Elementary.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 59.1% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 84.0% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 9.0% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.0% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 28.6% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -9.2pp | -2.9pp | not scored |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 86 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 82 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 64 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.7pp higher vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.2pp lower vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 65 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
- ↓ vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 50 | 66% | 20% | 10% | 4% | 86% | +43 |
| Grade 4 | 51 | 57% | 27% | 12% | 4% | 84% | +40 |
| Grade 5 | 42 | 57% | 26% | 14% | 2% | 83% | +36 |
| Grade 6 | 52 | 56% | 33% | 12% | 0% | 88% | +42 |
| Grade 7 | 59 | 36% | 42% | 19% | 3% | 78% | +30 |
| Grade 8 | 38 | 37% | 47% | 13% | 3% | 84% | +38 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 50 | 70% | 22% | 2% | 6% | 92% | +47 |
| Grade 4 | 51 | 55% | 27% | 14% | 4% | 82% | +41 |
| Grade 5 | 42 | 50% | 26% | 14% | 10% | 76% | +41 |
| Grade 6 | 52 | 73% | 13% | 8% | 6% | 87% | +52 |
| Grade 7 | 59 | 51% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 75% | +41 |
| Grade 8 | 38 | 37% | 26% | 18% | 18% | 63% | +31 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 80 | 31% | 29% | 40% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 135 | 80.0% | +7 | +18 |
| Asian | 23 | 91.3% | +14 | +17 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 93.3% | +18 | +32 |
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tice Creek ← | — | 73 | 59.1% | 84.0% | −9.2pp | — | 1.0% |
| Burton Valley Elementary | 2.2 mi | 76 | 54.8% | 82.1% | +7.8pp | — | 0.5% |
| Alamo Elementary | 2.4 mi | 73 | 56.9% | 85.8% | −11.4pp | — | 0.1% |
| Springhill Elementary | 2.4 mi | 67 | 58.7% | 83.8% | −4.0pp | — | 0.5% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 71 | 92 | #436 | 50.0% | 75.6% | 2.8% | 0.8% | -1.3pp |
| 2022 | 75 | 94 | #316 | 50.6% | 79.2% | 9.3% | 1.0% | -30.5pp |
| 2023 | 80 | 97 | #199 | 58.0% | 82.6% | 9.7% | 1.8% | -7.3pp |
| 2024 | 76 | 97 | #175 | 62.5% | 85.0% | 8.3% | 2.1% | +13.1pp |
| 2025 | 73 | 96 | #245 | 59.1% | 84.0% | 9.0% | 1.0% | -9.2pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1.5% | 6.6% | +5.1pp |
| Male | 2.2% | 9.7% | +7.5pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 13.4% | +13.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2.0% | 7.7% | +5.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 1.3% | +1.3pp |
| White | 2.4% | 7.5% | +5.1pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 2.8% | 21.7% | +18.9pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | 14.7% | +14.7pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0.0% | 26.2% | +26.2pp |
| All Students | 1.9% | 8.1% | +6.2pp |
| Filipino | — | 0.0% | — |
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +9 | 234 | Accelerated | +12 | 234 | Accelerated |
| English Only | +10 | 171 | not categorised | +13 | 171 | not categorised |
| White | +10 | 114 | Accelerated | +7 | 114 | Accelerated |
| Asian | +11 | 40 | Accelerated | +21 | 40 | Exceptional |
| Two or More Races | +10 | 37 | Accelerated | +15 | 37 | Accelerated |
| Hispanic or Latino | +8 | 27 | Accelerated | +6 | 27 | Accelerated |
| Students with Disabilities | +4 | 21 | Average | +7 | 21 | Accelerated |
| English Learner | −2 | 18 | Average | +7 | 18 | Accelerated |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +9 | 15 | Accelerated | +7 | 15 | Accelerated |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | −1 | 13 | not categorised | +16 | 13 | not categorised |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/tice-creek-1714"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Tice Creek — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction