ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Schafer Park Elementary · Hayward

Schafer Park Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Schafer Park posts 31% meeting the standard and 14.1% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

26268 Flamingo Avenue, 94544 (opens in new tab)·Hayward Unified·Hayward·Grades TK-6·606 students·77% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 723-3895
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded14%21%
% Met+31%43%
Growth+5.5-2.9
Absence22.6%17.9%
Suspension0.9%1.6%
Scope Score
38
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #3,544 statewide · #7 of 21 in Hayward Unified

Schafer Park Elementary scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 38th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “31% proficient” and call it done. Schafer Park deserves a closer read. The school sits in Hayward, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 38th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Maintained)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 31% meet the standard today, versus 40% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 344%38%35%42%25%
Grade 443%38%40%34%43%
Grade 548%33%32%41%43%
Grade 652%32%35%41%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 347%36%37%34%30%
Grade 434%24%20%25%22%
Grade 523%14%13%18%23%
Grade 636%16%24%25%26%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
9%
75%
Grade 3 · 25% proficient
20%
23%
57%
Grade 4 · 43% proficient
21%
22%
57%
Grade 5 · 43% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 5.3pp across grades; the floor rises 18.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.1%
State 21.3%
7.2pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+5.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
31.0%
State 42.7%
11.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.6%
State 17.9%
4.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.9%
State 1.6%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.7%
State 18.0%
4.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Schafer Park Elementary in Hayward, 38.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Schafer Park Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 277 students tested.

All students at this school: 33% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 33%, district —, state 43%33%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 21%, state 32%33% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 31%, district 23%, state 32%31% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 35%, district 28%, state 44%35% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 26%, state 42%31% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 11%, district 6%, state 11%11% · −22 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 3%, district 10%, state 15%3% · −30 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.6%, district 26.4%, state 17.9%22.6% · +4.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.9%, district —, state 1.6%0.9% · −0.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (32.6% vs 18.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.9%
TK/K32.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience15.9 years
Fully credentialed88%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$82,468 – $137,376
Principal salary$175,580 – $203,091
Superintendent salary$333,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,944, CA average $14,815$27,944 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,282 per student

$1,282 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,754 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support13%
Student services12%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,824 per pupil
2019$14,439 per pupil
2018$14,523 per pupil
2017$12,007 per pupil
2016$11,950 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic80.5%
District 65.8% · CA 56.1%
Other10.1%
District 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian5.5%
District 8.7% · CA 10.2%
Black2.5%
District 6.5% · CA 4.8%
White1.5%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 77.4% (14pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$108K · CA $85K
Median home value$827K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+29% · CA 35%
ZIP population76,947
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 26% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Schafer Park Elementary a good elementary school?

Schafer Park Elementary has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 38th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,544 statewide. 14.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.2 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Schafer Park Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 31.0% of students at Schafer Park Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 540 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Schafer Park Elementary rank in California?

Schafer Park Elementary ranks #3,544 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 38th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Schafer Park Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Schafer Park Elementary increases by 5.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Schafer Park Elementary?

22.6% of students at Schafer Park Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Schafer Park Elementary compare to other schools in Hayward?

Schafer Park Elementary scores 38/100 (38th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 606 students. Use the schools in Hayward page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Schafer Park Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Schafer Park Elementary in Hayward, 38.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Schafer Park Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 277 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.1%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 43th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+5.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
31.0%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 41th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.9%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 56th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39616%9%28%47%25%−18
Grade 48820%23%19%38%43%−2
Grade 58621%22%30%27%43%−5
Grade 67815%41%17%27%56%+10
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39613%18%28%42%30%−15
Grade 4887%15%36%42%22%−20
Grade 5868%15%28%49%23%−12
Grade 68112%14%31%43%26%−9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11866%20%56%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged27738.5%+9+0
Hispanic/Latino27740.3%+14+1
English Learners11511.3%+5+1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Schafer Park Elementary ←3814.1%31.0%+5.50.9%
Southgate Elementary0.5 mi4521.9%48.6%+12.40.7%
Knowledge Enlightens You (KEY) Academy2.3 mi449.8%27.0%−9.30.9%
Hayward Collegiate Charter0.4 mi4122.2%49.1%+3.61.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193839#333115.4%39.9%10.2%2.0%-9.9pp
20222416#481710.7%30.4%56.6%1.1%-13.3pp
20232820#457213.0%29.6%40.4%0.7%-13.2pp
20243838#352912.2%32.2%23.8%1.6%-8.8pp
20253838#354414.1%31.0%22.6%0.9%+5.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.9%21.4%+11.5pp
Male10.6%24.5%+13.9pp
Asian6.3%23.5%+17.2pp
Black/African American34.2%63.2%+29.0pp
White3.7%7.4%+3.7pp
Hispanic/Latino9.2%23.9%+14.7pp
Pacific Islander9.5%16.7%+7.2pp
Two or More Races5.9%0.0%-5.9pp
Students with Disabilities15.8%28.6%+12.8pp
English Learners9.0%23.3%+14.3pp
Homeless27.3%45.5%+18.2pp
Military-Connected0.0%17.9%+17.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.2%25.2%+14.0pp
All Students10.2%22.9%+12.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction