ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Charter elementary school

Santa Clarita Valley International

Castaic, CA · Grades TK-12 · 548 students · William S. Hart Union High

No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

39% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 26% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

On the Rise

What this means for your family

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

How archetypes are assigned →

Math

26%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

English

39%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

548

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

15%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 38%2022: 21%2023: 19%2024: 44%2025: 26%2019: 48%2022: 36%2023: 30%2024: 53%2025: 39%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 38%2022: 21%2023: 19%2024: 44%2025: 26%2019: 48%2022: 36%2023: 30%2024: 53%2025: 39%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201938%48%
202221%36%
202319%30%
202444%53%
202526%39%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Climbed from the 41st to the 54th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 600 elementary schools.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Santa Clarita Valley International deserves a closer read. Two in five of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, Santa Clarita Valley International enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

294 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 48 tracked

Santa Clarita Valley International scores 37 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 54th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 35% meet the standard today, versus 42% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 41st percentile · Scope Score 32 of 1002022 · 43rd percentile · Scope Score 29 of 1002023 · 26th percentile · Scope Score 24 of 1002024 · 63rd percentile · Scope Score 42 of 1002025 · 54th percentile · Scope Score 37 of 100
ELAOrange(Declined)MathOrange(Maintained)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 340%29%31%39%33%
Grade 444%35%18%31%41%
Grade 556%42%29%61%46%
Grade 654%46%35%38%59%
Grade 767%52%49%46%49%
Grade 859%59%46%52%38%
Grade 1162%60%56%60%59%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 349%26%19%44%30%
Grade 434%26%25%24%41%
Grade 528%16%20%44%22%
Grade 629%24%19%15%25%
Grade 740%23%32%20%31%
Grade 844%36%28%29%26%
Grade 1132%23%26%23%33%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

One in three of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.

ELA46% met or exceeded
Exceeded 16%Met 30%Nearly Met 22%Not Met 33%
Math29% met or exceeded
Exceeded 11%Met 18%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 44%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)AbsenceSuspension
This school3715%35%Strong · p8615.4%2.8%
CA average · Elementary School3921%43%Average · p5017.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope3739
% Exceeded15%21%
% Met+35%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strong · p86Average · p50
Absence15.4%17.9%
Suspension2.8%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

Our growth read and California's own model disagree here — the 86th percentile against the state's 33rd.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 86th percentile of California elementary schools; the state's puts it around the 33rd in reading and math together — a harder read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
10%
exceeded standard · 31% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
15%
exceeded standard · 46% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 86th percentile among California elementary schools.86th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 41st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.41st pctile · −1 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 25th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.25th pctile · −8 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard about even with the same group statewide.

At Santa Clarita Valley International in Castaic, 37.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Santa Clarita Valley International trails its district average for low-income students by 17.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.9 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 132 students tested.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 37% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 37%, district —, state 43%37%
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 58%, state 42%34% · −3 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 29%, district 44%, state 32%29% · −9 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 47%, state 32%28% · −9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 60%, state 44%41% · +3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 42%, district 67%, state 56%42% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 13%, district 19%, state 15%13% · −25 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only165 studentsEnglish Only, reading: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 165 students.0 pts · −3 vs typical
Low-income students91 studentsLow-income students, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 91 students.−1 pts · −1 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students80 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 80 students.0 pts · −1 vs typical
White80 studentsWhite, reading: +1 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 80 students.+1 pts · −4 vs typical
Students with disabilities43 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −5 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 43 students.−5 pts · +3 vs typical
Math
English Only163 studentsEnglish Only, math: −5 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 163 students.−5 pts · −6 vs typical
Low-income students90 studentsLow-income students, math: −12 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 90 students.−12 pts · −11 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students80 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −10 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 80 students.−10 pts · −9 vs typical
White78 studentsWhite, math: −7 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 78 students.−7 pts · −12 vs typical
Students with disabilities42 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −19 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 42 students.−19 pts · −14 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 23 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher23 · district 24
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience10.0 years
Fully credentialed47%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit4.7%
PrincipalMartha Spansel
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$57,538 – $101,943
Principal salaryUp to $172,444
Superintendent salary$310,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here show up more, and get suspended more, than the state average.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.4%, district 15.4%, state 17.9%15.4% · −2.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.8%, district —, state 1.6%2.8% · +1.2pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

Its district spends $11,844 per student, less than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $11,844, CA average $14,491$11,844 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,176 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 58%Instruction support 12%Student services 11%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,844 per pupil
2019$11,615 per pupil
2018$11,989 per pupil
2017$10,579 per pupil
2016$9,869 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Two in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 35% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino40.3% · district 45.3% · CA 56.1%
White36.0% · district 31.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.4% · district 8.1% · CA 10.2%
Black8.9% · district 4.4% · CA 4.8%
Other12.4% · district 10.3% · CA 9.0%
GenderFemale 42.5% · Male 56.8% · Non-binary 0.7%
Free or reduced lunch44.7% · CA 64%
Median income$132K · CA $85K
Median home value$767K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+32% · CA 35%
ZIP population26,478
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Santa Clarita Valley InternationalCharterSolid15%35%School being viewed
Castaic ElementaryPublicSolid26%56%1.3 mi
Live Oak ElementaryPublicSolid18%37%0.3 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in Castaic →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

4 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Check enrollment with this charter school

Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.

School website →

Schools across the K–12 journey

Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.

Charter enrollment details

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Santa Clarita Valley International a good elementary school?
Santa Clarita Valley International has a Scope Score of 37 out of 100, placing it in the 54th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,612 statewide. 15.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Santa Clarita Valley International's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.5% of students at Santa Clarita Valley International met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 15.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 15.1% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 291 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Santa Clarita Valley International rank in California?
Santa Clarita Valley International ranks #2,612 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 54th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Santa Clarita Valley International getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Santa Clarita Valley International that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California elementary schools — roughly the 86th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Santa Clarita Valley International?
15.4% of students at Santa Clarita Valley International are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Santa Clarita Valley International compare to other schools in Castaic?
Santa Clarita Valley International scores 37/100 (54th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 548 students. Use the schools in Castaic page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Santa Clarita Valley International serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Santa Clarita Valley International in Castaic, 37.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Santa Clarita Valley International trails its district average for low-income students by 17.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.9 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 132 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

The 5 things our score weighs

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 84 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard15.1%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded35.5%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism15.4%17.9%5%
Suspension rate2.8%1.6%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Santa Clarita Valley International: reading the evidence

Santa Clarita Valley International posts 35% meeting the standard and 15.1% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.4% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Santa Clarita Valley International is ranked #2,612 statewide.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard15.1%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded35.5%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism15.4%17.9%5%
Suspension rate2.8%1.6%5%
Exceeded standard
↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 44 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 44 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
↑ vs CA average · 86th pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 54 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 13.1pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 1.6% · index 40 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35219%13%17%50%33%−10
Grade 44122%20%15%44%41%−3
Grade 55215%31%23%31%46%−2
Grade 6589%50%22%19%59%+13
Grade 73711%38%30%22%49%+1
Grade 83714%24%27%35%38%−8
Grade 111735%24%18%24%59%+10
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3547%22%24%46%30%−16
Grade 44115%27%22%37%41%+0
Grade 55112%10%25%53%22%−13
Grade 6577%18%37%39%25%−10
Grade 73514%17%40%29%31%−2
Grade 83913%13%13%62%26%−6
Grade 111817%17%28%39%33%+10

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide11114%21%51%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13237.9%−18−0
Hispanic/Latino11336.3%−23−3
White9352.7%−24−9
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Santa Clarita Valley International ←—3715.1%35.5%+2.7pp+84 pts2.8%
Castaic Elementary1.3 mi4225.9%55.7%−10.2pp—0.3%
Live Oak Elementary0.3 mi3717.7%37.1%+0.1pp—0.3%
California average—3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193241#321814.5%41.8%15.7%1.0%-2.8pp
20222943#326012.4%28.9%36.2%0.6%+1.4pp
20232426#419510.6%23.8%34.3%2.7%-0.3pp
20244263#210812.2%40.6%28.5%3.6%+11.0pp
20253754#261215.1%35.5%15.4%2.8%+2.7pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−1199Average−8197Moderate
English Only0165not categorised−5163not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−191Average−1290Moderate
Hispanic or Latino080Average−1080Moderate
White+180Average−778Moderate
Students with Disabilities−543Average−1942Moderate
English Learner−724Moderate−1624Moderate
English Learners Only−2314not categorised−2714not categorised
Black or African American+1612Accelerated−112Average
Two or More Races+1812Accelerated+212Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/santa-clarita-valley-international-7234"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Santa Clarita Valley International — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Santa Clarita Valley International

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.