ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
San Fernando Institute of Applied Media · San Fernando

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 9.0pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2843
% Exceeded6%17%
% Met+23%39%
Growth+9.0+1.5
Absence18.8%18.5%
Suspension0.8%3.7%
Scope Score
28
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #1,802 statewide · #199 of 226 in Los Angeles Unified

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 19th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “23% proficient” and call it done. San Fernando Institute of Applied Media deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Fernando, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 19th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 23% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 620%27%23%28%19%
Grade 737%41%36%37%42%
Grade 819%29%41%39%36%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 614%15%14%10%13%
Grade 727%19%21%17%17%
Grade 811%5%17%17%14%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
81%
Grade 6 · 19% proficient
12%
30%
58%
Grade 7 · 42% proficient
30%
65%
Grade 8 · 35% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.9%
State 16.8%
10.9pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+9.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
23.3%
State 39.3%
16.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.8%
State 18.5%
0.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.8%
State 3.7%
2.8pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
16.3%
State 18.0%
1.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At San Fernando Institute of Applied Media in San Fernando, 30.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. San Fernando Institute of Applied Media trails its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 23.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 342 students tested.

All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 39%23%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 24%, district 36%, state 32%24% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 36%, state 32%22% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 23%, district 42%, state 44%23% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 24%, district 41%, state 42%24% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 14%, state 15%6% · −18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 0%, district 9%, state 11%0% · −23 vs school

6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 18.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.8%, district 24.5%, state 18.5%18.8% · +0.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.8%, district —, state 3.7%0.8% · −2.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.5%
Grades 7–818.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 20:119:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience11.3 years
Fully credentialed67%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit3.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,793, CA average $14,815$20,793 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$796 per student

$796 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic95.0%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White1.8%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black1.6%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other1.6%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 90.9% (27pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$85K · CA $85K
Median home value$662K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,424
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 384 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is San Fernando Institute of Applied Media a good middle school?

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media has a Scope Score of 28 out of 100, placing it in the 19th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,802 statewide. 5.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.9 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are San Fernando Institute of Applied Media's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.3% of students at San Fernando Institute of Applied Media met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 764 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does San Fernando Institute of Applied Media rank in California?

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media ranks #1,802 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 19th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is San Fernando Institute of Applied Media getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at San Fernando Institute of Applied Media increases by 9.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at San Fernando Institute of Applied Media?

18.8% of students at San Fernando Institute of Applied Media are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 0.8%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does San Fernando Institute of Applied Media compare to other schools in San Fernando?

San Fernando Institute of Applied Media scores 28/100 (19th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 384 students. Use the schools in San Fernando page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does San Fernando Institute of Applied Media serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At San Fernando Institute of Applied Media in San Fernando, 30.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. San Fernando Institute of Applied Media trails its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 23.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 342 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
5.9%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 38th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+9.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.3%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 37th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.8%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 50th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.8%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 61th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
16.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 43th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61217%12%27%54%19%−28
Grade 712012%30%23%35%42%−6
Grade 81385%30%23%41%36%−11
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61251%12%19%68%13%−22
Grade 71218%8%23%60%17%−17
Grade 81393%12%23%63%14%−18
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111401%13%62%24%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged34230.4%−11−8
Hispanic/Latino36131.9%−9−7
Students with Disabilities818.6%−7−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
San Fernando Institute of Applied Media ←285.9%23.3%+9.00.8%
Olive Vista Middle2.2 mi4315.0%34.2%+3.50.4%
PUC Inspire Charter Academy1.8 mi378.7%24.1%+7.40.2%
Pacoima Middle2.4 mi3612.4%31.8%−3.00.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192720#16045.6%21.5%5.9%1.9%-2.3pp
20222314#18515.3%22.7%28.6%0.6%-4.0pp
20233845#11975.5%25.3%26.5%2.1%+10.5pp
20243134#14525.4%24.4%19.3%2.0%+9.0pp
20252819#18025.9%23.3%18.8%0.8%+9.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.8%17.0%+10.2pp
Male5.0%20.6%+15.6pp
Hispanic/Latino5.6%18.9%+13.3pp
Students with Disabilities5.1%21.2%+16.1pp
English Learners4.3%14.5%+10.2pp
Homeless10.0%13.3%+3.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6.0%19.1%+13.1pp
All Students5.8%18.8%+13.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction