ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy · San Fernando

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.1% vs 1.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2945
% Exceeded8%21%
% Met+23%43%
Growth-21.6-2.9
Absence28.3%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
29
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #4,948 statewide · #557 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy scores 29 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 14th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “23% proficient” and call it done. Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy deserves a closer read. It sits at the 14th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 14th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 23% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%21%16%17%32%
Grade 429%31%20%25%31%
Grade 527%25%18%25%16%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 332%27%31%22%33%
Grade 429%21%22%17%23%
Grade 510%5%6%11%6%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

25%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
13%
17%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
13%
84%
Grade 5 · 16% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
8.0%
State 21.3%
13.3pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-21.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
23.5%
State 42.7%
19.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
28.3%
State 17.9%
10.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.7%
State 18.0%
5.7pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy in San Fernando, 22.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 18.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 155 students tested.

All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 43%23%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 36%, state 32%23% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 36%, state 32%20% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 28%, district 41%, state 42%28% · +5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 18%, district 42%, state 44%18% · −6 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 9%, state 11%2% · −22 vs school

6 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 13.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 28.3%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%28.3% · +10.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–626.7%
TK/K38.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff25 teachers
Avg. experience18.4 years
Fully credentialed92%
Intern / emergency permit4.2%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $32,887, CA average $14,815$32,887 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,753 per student

$2,753 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic94.0%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White2.5%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black2.1%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other1.3%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.2%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$85K · CA $85K
Median home value$662K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,424
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 4% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy a good elementary school?

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy has a Scope Score of 29 out of 100, placing it in the 14th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,948 statewide. 8.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.5% of students at Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 15.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 385 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy rank in California?

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy ranks #4,948 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 14th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy decreases by 21.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy?

28.3% of students at Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy compare to other schools in San Fernando?

Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy scores 29/100 (14th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in San Fernando page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy in San Fernando, 22.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 18.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 155 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
8.0%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 37th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-21.6pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 34th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 35th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
28.3%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 33th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.7%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 58th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3717%25%39%28%32%−11
Grade 45213%17%17%52%31%−14
Grade 5683%13%35%49%16%−32
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3737%26%41%26%33%−13
Grade 45313%9%30%47%23%−19
Grade 5684%1%22%72%6%−29
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11681%3%74%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15522.6%−18−16
Hispanic/Latino17725.4%−16−13
English Learners270.0%−7−10
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Gridley-Montañez Dual Language Academy ←298.0%23.5%−21.60.1%
San Jose Street Elementary3.1 mi6028.4%48.9%+6.70.5%
Harding Street Elementary0.8 mi5623.0%42.2%+13.40.1%
PUC Community Charter Elementary0.6 mi5527.7%53.3%+13.00.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192813#47966.6%26.4%24.3%0.0%-12.8pp
20222212#50455.2%21.7%50.5%0.7%-8.9pp
2023239#52045.8%19.0%40.5%1.0%-11.8pp
20242712#50676.5%19.7%29.3%0.5%-1.8pp
20252914#49488.0%23.5%28.3%0.1%-21.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 16 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female25.9%31.9%+6.0pp
Male23.4%26.8%+3.4pp
Hispanic/Latino24.8%29.6%+4.8pp
Students with Disabilities31.0%37.3%+6.3pp
English Learners19.2%35.5%+16.3pp
Homeless45.5%41.0%-4.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24.5%31.5%+7.0pp
All Students24.6%29.1%+4.5pp
Black/African American33.3%
Filipino23.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction