Salisbury High (Continuation): The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Salisbury High (Continuation) posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 14 | 2% | 8% | 62.7% | 0.0% | 72.9% | 9.4% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Salisbury High (Continuation) scores 14 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 4th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “8% proficient” and call it done. Salisbury High (Continuation) deserves a closer read. The school sits in Red Bluff, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 4th percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 8% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 12% | 29% | 11% | 10% | 14% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 8 are proficient by 11th grade → 63 graduate → 0 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Salisbury High (Continuation) in Red Bluff, 15.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 46.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Salisbury High (Continuation) trails its district average for low-income students by 31.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (2.2% Math proficient); White students (12.5% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 46 students tested.
5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,091 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 104 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 5% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Salisbury High (Continuation) a good high school?
What are Salisbury High (Continuation)'s CAASPP test scores?
How does Salisbury High (Continuation) rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Salisbury High (Continuation)?
How does Salisbury High (Continuation) compare to other schools in Red Bluff?
How does Salisbury High (Continuation) serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 35
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 51 | 2% | 12% | 16% | 71% | 14% | −33 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 51 | 2% | 0% | 10% | 88% | 2% | −21 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 56 | 0% | 5% | 75% | 20% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 46 | 15.2% | −32 | −23 |
| White | 24 | 12.5% | −42 | −49 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 23 | 13.0% | −29 | −26 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salisbury High (Continuation) ← | — | 14 | 2.0% | 7.8% | — | 9.4% |
| Red Bluff High | 1.6 mi | 48 | 14.6% | 39.5% | — | 1.4% |
| Tehama eLearning Academy | 1.6 mi | 22 | 4.7% | 11.6% | — | 1.0% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15 | 6 | #1923 | 1.0% | 6.0% | 56.2% | 10.9% | — |
| 2022 | 18 | 8 | #1937 | 4.7% | 15.7% | 64.5% | 3.0% | — |
| 2023 | 13 | 5 | #2046 | 1.5% | 5.3% | 75.2% | 5.6% | — |
| 2024 | 11 | 3 | #2072 | 0.0% | 4.9% | 71.4% | 13.1% | — |
| 2025 | 14 | 4 | #2070 | 2.0% | 7.8% | 72.9% | 9.4% | — |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 23 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 64.5% | 82.5% | +18.0pp |
| Male | 66.0% | 87.2% | +21.2pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 66.7% | 86.7% | +20.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 70.6% | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | 55.6% | 94.1% | +38.5pp |
| Homeless | 68.4% | 90.5% | +22.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 65.4% | 84.5% | +19.1pp |
| All Students | 65.3% | 85.0% | +19.7pp |
| English Learners | — | 76.5% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction