ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary · Riverside

S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

S. Christa McAuliffe posts 29% meeting the standard and 9.7% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

4100 Golden Avenue, 92505 (opens in new tab)·Alvord Unified·Riverside·Grades TK-5·508 students·74% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 358-1625·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3445
% Exceeded10%21%
% Met+29%43%
Growth+14.0-2.9
Absence18.9%17.9%
Suspension3.3%1.6%
Scope Score
34
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #4,202 statewide · #9 of 14 in Alvord Unified

S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 27th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “29% proficient” and call it done. S. Christa McAuliffe deserves a closer read. The school sits in Riverside, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 52nd to the 27th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARed(Declined Significantly)MathRed(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 29% meet the standard today, versus 41% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 342%34%30%47%20%
Grade 442%36%31%37%34%
Grade 552%44%39%42%43%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 344%31%34%41%24%
Grade 438%23%34%35%24%
Grade 528%15%21%23%29%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

14%
79%
Grade 3 · 21% proficient
17%
17%
66%
Grade 4 · 34% proficient
13%
30%
57%
Grade 5 · 43% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.5pp across grades; the floor rises 23.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
9.7%
State 21.3%
11.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+14.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
29.2%
State 42.7%
13.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.9%
State 17.9%
1.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.3%
State 1.6%
1.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.8%
State 18.0%
11.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary in Riverside, 30.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 206 students tested.

All students at this school: 30% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 30%, district —, state 43%30%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 26%, district 28%, state 32%26% · −4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 27%, district 28%, state 32%27% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 30%, district 31%, state 44%30% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 31%, state 42%30% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 7%, state 11%10% · −20 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 3%, district 7%, state 15%3% · −27 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 38%, district 43%, state 56%38% · +7 vs school

9 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.9%, district 24.0%, state 17.9%18.9% · +1.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.3%, district —, state 1.6%3.3% · +1.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (24.0% vs 14.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.0%
TK/K24.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff23 teachers
Avg. experience18.8 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,828 – $147,670
Principal salary$172,452 – $188,984
Superintendent salary$315,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,556, CA average $14,815$24,556 · spent at this school
Federal share$228 per student

$228 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,841 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,196 per pupil
2019$13,092 per pupil
2018$13,771 per pupil
2017$12,822 per pupil
2016$12,265 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic71.8%
District 81.3% · CA 56.1%
White9.8%
District 7.2% · CA 19.9%
Other7.5%
District 3.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian6.3%
District 3.7% · CA 10.2%
Black4.5%
District 4.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 73.6% (10pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$85K · CA $85K
Median home value$570K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+21% · CA 35%
ZIP population53,419
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary a good elementary school?

S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 27th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,202 statewide. 9.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 29.2% of students at S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 9.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 9.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 546 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary rank in California?

S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary ranks #4,202 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 27th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary increases by 14.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary?

18.9% of students at S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary compare to other schools in Riverside?

S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary scores 34/100 (27th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 508 students. Use the schools in Riverside page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary in Riverside, 30.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 206 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
9.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 39th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+14.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
29.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 40th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 48th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.3%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 36th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 35th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3747%14%31%49%20%−23
Grade 49317%17%18%47%34%−10
Grade 510613%30%28%28%43%−4
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3741%23%24%51%24%−21
Grade 4938%16%38%39%24%−18
Grade 510612%17%26%44%29%−6
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1110611%14%55%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20630.6%−4−8
Hispanic/Latino19829.8%−5−9
English Learners417.3%−0−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary ←349.7%29.2%+14.03.3%
Lake Hills Elementary2.4 mi5534.0%65.2%−10.80.5%
Promenade Elementary1.8 mi5424.8%51.5%−7.41.0%
Twinhill Elementary1.9 mi478.9%30.6%+28.70.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194352#264216.4%41.2%7.0%0.9%-2.7pp
20223138#35599.4%30.6%30.9%1.9%-2.8pp
20233439#351312.8%31.3%24.4%1.8%-1.5pp
20244251#281314.7%37.6%17.6%1.8%-11.3pp
20253427#42029.7%29.2%18.9%3.3%+14.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.7%18.0%+13.3pp
Male9.2%19.9%+10.7pp
Asian3.1%5.7%+2.6pp
Black/African American10.5%37.0%+26.5pp
White7.7%0.0%-7.7pp
Hispanic/Latino6.5%19.6%+13.1pp
Two or More Races18.2%29.2%+11.0pp
Students with Disabilities15.4%21.0%+5.6pp
English Learners3.6%16.1%+12.5pp
Homeless6.3%11.4%+5.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.1%21.0%+12.9pp
All Students7.0%19.0%+12.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction