Math
44%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Charter elementary school
River Islands Technology Academy II
54% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 43%. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.
55% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 44% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Building Momentum
What this means for your family
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
55%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
954Total enrollment
Chronic absence
15%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 53% | 68% |
| 2023 | 50% | 59% |
| 2024 | 57% | 65% |
| 2025 | 44% | 55% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
22%ProficientStandard Met
23%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
27%MinimalStandard Not Met
29%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
31%ProficientStandard Met
24%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
23%MinimalStandard Not Met
22%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2022 to 2025
Slipped from the 78th to the 68th percentile since 2022.
Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. River Islands Technology Academy II deserves a closer read. One in three of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
River Islands Technology Academy II's low-income kids hit 51.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, River Islands Technology Academy II enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
693 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 113 tracked
River Islands Technology Academy II scores 44 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 68th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 69% | 48% | 60% | 62% |
| Grade 4 | 62% | 56% | 33% | 64% |
| Grade 5 | 68% | 71% | 71% | 48% |
| Grade 6 | 67% | 65% | 69% | 71% |
| Grade 7 | 63% | 57% | 65% | 78% |
| Grade 8 | 62% | 61% | 66% | 69% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 67% | 44% | 55% | 59% |
| Grade 4 | 57% | 65% | 39% | 59% |
| Grade 5 | 39% | 57% | 59% | 29% |
| Grade 6 | 48% | 43% | 66% | 62% |
| Grade 7 | 50% | 54% | 52% | 62% |
| Grade 8 | 45% | 48% | 55% | 60% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
More than half of students here meet the standard. One in four clear it by a lot.
ELA66% met or exceeded
Exceeded 32%Met 34%Nearly Met 19%Not Met 15%
Math55% met or exceeded
Exceeded 31%Met 24%Nearly Met 25%Not Met 20%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 44 | 29% | 54% | Below avg · p41 | 14.6% | 1.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | Average · p50 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope4439
% Exceeded29%21%
% Met+54%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Below avg · p41Average · p50
Absence14.6%17.9%
Suspension1.5%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
Our growth read and California's own model disagree here — the 41st percentile against the state's 77th.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 41st percentile of California elementary schools; the state's puts it around the 77th in reading and math together — a better read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
27%
exceeded standard · 48% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
24%
exceeded standard · 48% met or exceeded
n = 113
returning cohort
returning cohort
Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.
Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 41st percentile among California elementary schools.41st pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 73rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.73rd pctile · +8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 80th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.80th pctile · +12 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.
51.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. This comparison does not tell us what caused the difference.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 60% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 60%, district —, state 43%60%
FemaleFemale: this school 62%, district —, state 44%62% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 59%, district 8%, state 42%59% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 45%, district 20%, state 32%45% · −15 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 51%, district 17%, state 32%51% · −10 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 74%, district —, state 72%74% · +14 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 75%, district —, state 65%75% · +15 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 58%, district —, state 56%58% · −2 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 45%, district —, state 26%45% · −16 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 30%, district 0%, state 15%30% · −31 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 11%, district 18%, state 11%11% · −50 vs school
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 23.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
English Only419 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 419 students.+8 pts · +5 vs typical
Low-income students205 studentsLow-income students, reading: +10 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 205 students.+10 pts · +10 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students202 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 202 students.+9 pts · +8 vs typical
Asian112 studentsAsian, reading: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against +7 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 112 students.+11 pts · +4 vs typical
Filipino92 studentsFilipino, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against +10 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 92 students.+9 pts · −1 vs typical
Math
English Only418 studentsEnglish Only, math: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 418 students.+11 pts · +10 vs typical
Low-income students204 studentsLow-income students, math: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 204 students.+9 pts · +10 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students201 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 201 students.+6 pts · +7 vs typical
Asian112 studentsAsian, math: +24 scale-score points versus expectation, against +16 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 112 students.+24 pts · +8 vs typical
Filipino92 studentsFilipino, math: +23 scale-score points versus expectation, against +9 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 92 students.+23 pts · +14 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 24 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher24 · district 24
Teaching staff44 teachers
Avg. experience6.8 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers7%
Intern / emergency permit9.5%
PrincipalAaron Colburn
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$59,858 – $115,707
Superintendent salary$216,665
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.6%, district 18.9%, state 17.9%14.6% · −3.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.5%, district —, state 1.6%1.5% · −0.1pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
One in three of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 954 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).
On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino34.4% · district 28.7% · CA 56.1%
White12.1% · district 8.7% · CA 19.9%
Asian24.3% · district 36.3% · CA 10.2%
Black11.1% · district 9.2% · CA 4.8%
Other18.1% · district 17.1% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch35.2% · CA 64%
Median income$125K · CA $85K
Median home value$643K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+28% · CA 35%
ZIP population35,395
Median age34 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Islands Technology Academy II | Charter | Solid | 29% | 54% | School being viewed | |
| Marengo Elementary | Public | Strong | 67% | 89% | 1.6 mi | |
| Monterey Hills Elementary | Public | Strong | 52% | 78% | 0.6 mi | |
| Arroyo Vista Elementary | Public | Strong | 60% | 84% | 1.2 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check enrollment with this charter school
Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.
School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Charter enrollment details
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is River Islands Technology Academy II a good elementary school?
River Islands Technology Academy II has a Scope Score of 44 out of 100, placing it in the 68th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,858 statewide. 28.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.4 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are River Islands Technology Academy II's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 53.6% of students at River Islands Technology Academy II met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 28.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 28.8% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 686 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does River Islands Technology Academy II rank in California?
River Islands Technology Academy II ranks #1,858 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 68th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is River Islands Technology Academy II getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At River Islands Technology Academy II that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks below avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 41st percentile, behind the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at River Islands Technology Academy II?
14.6% of students at River Islands Technology Academy II are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does River Islands Technology Academy II compare to other schools in Lathrop?
River Islands Technology Academy II scores 44/100 (68th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 954 students. Use the schools in Lathrop page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does River Islands Technology Academy II serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At River Islands Technology Academy II in Lathrop, 51.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. River Islands Technology Academy II outperforms its district average for low-income students by 25.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (38.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (57.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 247 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 5 things our score weighs
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 70 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 28.8% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 53.6% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Below avg | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 14.6% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.5% | 1.6% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
River Islands Technology Academy II: reading the evidence
River Islands Technology Academy II posts 54% meeting the standard, against 43% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
River Islands Technology Academy II is ranked #1,858 statewide · #3 of 5 in Banta Unified.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 28.8% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 53.6% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Below avg | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 14.6% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.5% | 1.6% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 57 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 58 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
- ↓ vs CA average · 41st pctile
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.4pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 51 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.5pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 114 | 39% | 24% | 21% | 17% | 62% | +19 |
| Grade 4 | 117 | 38% | 26% | 19% | 17% | 64% | +19 |
| Grade 5 | 113 | 24% | 24% | 26% | 27% | 48% | +0 |
| Grade 6 | 111 | 36% | 35% | 19% | 10% | 71% | +25 |
| Grade 7 | 118 | 31% | 47% | 14% | 8% | 78% | +30 |
| Grade 8 | 120 | 23% | 47% | 18% | 13% | 69% | +23 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 113 | 30% | 29% | 26% | 15% | 59% | +14 |
| Grade 4 | 117 | 28% | 31% | 27% | 14% | 59% | +18 |
| Grade 5 | 112 | 13% | 16% | 28% | 43% | 29% | −6 |
| Grade 6 | 111 | 40% | 23% | 28% | 10% | 62% | +28 |
| Grade 7 | 118 | 44% | 18% | 22% | 16% | 62% | +28 |
| Grade 8 | 120 | 33% | 28% | 19% | 21% | 60% | +28 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 232 | 13% | 19% | 55% | 13% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 247 | 51.8% | +25 | +14 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 242 | 57.0% | +37 | +18 |
| Asian | 160 | 77.5% | — | +3 |
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Islands Technology Academy II ← | — | 44 | 28.8% | 53.6% | −22.2pp | +70 pts | 1.5% |
| Marengo Elementary | 1.6 mi | 83 | 66.9% | 88.8% | −5.4pp | — | 0.2% |
| Monterey Hills Elementary | 0.6 mi | 73 | 52.0% | 78.3% | +4.5pp | — | 0.7% |
| Arroyo Vista Elementary | 1.2 mi | 72 | 59.8% | 83.8% | −11.7pp | — | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 52 | 78 | #1227 | 30.5% | 60.4% | 26.7% | 1.4% | -14.8pp |
| 2023 | 50 | 77 | #1337 | 29.0% | 56.7% | 19.4% | 1.2% | +18.0pp |
| 2024 | 48 | 73 | #1545 | 27.4% | 52.7% | 16.0% | 2.0% | +8.0pp |
| 2025 | 44 | 68 | #1858 | 28.8% | 53.6% | 14.6% | 1.5% | -22.2pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
What we can't show
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +8 | 561 | Accelerated | +12 | 560 | Accelerated |
| English Only | +8 | 419 | not categorised | +11 | 418 | not categorised |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +10 | 205 | Accelerated | +9 | 204 | Accelerated |
| Hispanic or Latino | +9 | 202 | Accelerated | +6 | 201 | Accelerated |
| Asian | +11 | 112 | Accelerated | +24 | 112 | Exceptional |
| Filipino | +9 | 92 | Accelerated | +23 | 92 | Exceptional |
| English Learner | +3 | 79 | Average | +1 | 79 | Average |
| White | +6 | 79 | Accelerated | +5 | 79 | Accelerated |
| Students with Disabilities | +11 | 68 | Accelerated | +7 | 67 | Accelerated |
| Black or African American | +2 | 63 | Average | +1 | 63 | Average |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +3 | 42 | not categorised | +12 | 42 | not categorised |
| English Learners Only | −1 | 37 | not categorised | −9 | 37 | not categorised |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | +16 | 18 | Accelerated | −1 | 18 | Average |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/river-islands-technology-academy-ii-7134"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="River Islands Technology Academy II — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction