ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Price Intermediate · Orland

Price Intermediate: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Price Intermediate posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 3.0pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1212 Marin Street, 95963 (opens in new tab)·Orland Joint Unified·Orland·Grades 6-8·449 students·92% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 865-1225
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2543
% Exceeded2%17%
% Met+15%39%
Growth+3.0+1.5
Absence16.7%18.5%
Suspension16.6%3.7%
Scope Score
25
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #1,998 statewide

Price Intermediate scores 25 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 11th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Price Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Orland, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 45th to the 11th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 15% meet the standard today, versus 25% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 622%16%17%19%16%
Grade 742%34%23%13%28%
Grade 829%29%31%19%20%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 610%7%6%5%5%
Grade 725%16%10%7%12%
Grade 823%26%12%5%7%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
83%
Grade 6 · 17% proficient
22%
72%
Grade 7 · 28% proficient
19%
80%
Grade 8 · 20% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
2.4%
State 16.8%
14.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+3.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
14.7%
State 39.3%
24.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.7%
State 18.5%
1.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
16.6%
State 3.7%
13.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
8.2%
State 18.0%
9.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Price Intermediate in Orland, 20.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 22.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Price Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 2.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (7.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 388 students tested.

All students at this school: 15% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 15%, district —, state 39%15%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 14%, district 17%, state 32%14% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 12%, district 16%, state 32%12% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 13%, district 17%, state 42%13% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 16%, district 20%, state 44%16% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 1%, district 4%, state 11%1% · −13 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 22%, district 26%, state 56%22% · +7 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 4%, state 15%6% · −9 vs school

6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.7%, district 23.1%, state 18.5%16.7% · −1.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 16.6%, district —, state 3.7%16.6% · +13.0pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (18.7% vs 12.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.4%
Grades 7–818.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 17:1, district 19:117:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience8.3 years
Fully credentialed83%
First-year teachers34%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$59,986 – $119,852
Principal salary$147,531 – $136,692
Superintendent salary$208,138

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,407, CA average $14,815$18,407 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,048 per student

$2,048 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,782 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support8%
Student services8%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,496 per pupil
2019$11,707 per pupil
2018$12,312 per pupil
2017$11,159 per pupil
2016$10,736 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic75.5%
District 68.4% · CA 56.1%
White20.3%
District 27.1% · CA 19.9%
Other2.2%
District 2.6% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.8%
District 1.6% · CA 10.2%
Black0.2%
District 0.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 91.5% (28pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$68K · CA $85K
Median home value$373K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+16% · CA 35%
ZIP population16,070
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 449 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Price Intermediate a good middle school?

Price Intermediate has a Scope Score of 25 out of 100, placing it in the 11th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,998 statewide. 2.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Price Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 14.7% of students at Price Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 2.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 12.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 2.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 852 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Price Intermediate rank in California?

Price Intermediate ranks #1,998 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 11th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Price Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Price Intermediate increases by 3.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Price Intermediate?

16.7% of students at Price Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 16.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Price Intermediate compare to other schools in Orland?

Price Intermediate scores 25/100 (11th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 449 students. Use the schools in Orland page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Price Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Price Intermediate in Orland, 20.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 22.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Price Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 2.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (7.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 388 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
2.4%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 34th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+3.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 49th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
14.7%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 30th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 53th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
16.6%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 0th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
8.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 32th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61411%16%32%52%16%−30
Grade 71346%22%22%50%28%−20
Grade 81501%19%41%39%20%−26
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61420%5%16%79%5%−30
Grade 71344%7%31%57%12%−22
Grade 81512%5%19%74%7%−25
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111450%9%58%33%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38820.1%−2−18
Hispanic/Latino32317.6%−4−21
English Learners1031.0%−4−9
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Price Intermediate ←252.4%14.7%+3.016.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193745#11136.2%25.1%7.1%3.6%+10.5pp
20223648#11225.5%21.1%38.0%9.3%+15.8pp
20233125#16412.2%16.4%22.1%18.2%+9.7pp
2024176#20841.6%11.3%16.2%18.9%+0.0pp
20252511#19982.4%14.7%16.7%16.6%+3.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.1%14.6%+8.5pp
Male8.0%18.0%+10.0pp
Asian0.0%
Hispanic/Latino5.2%13.5%+8.3pp
Students with Disabilities11.1%26.0%+14.9pp
English Learners7.3%9.4%+2.1pp
Homeless10.5%30.0%+19.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7.7%17.5%+9.8pp
All Students7.1%16.6%+9.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction