Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8
PetalumaCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID50%50%
PetalumaCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8
PetalumaCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID34%37%
PetalumaCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 62% in 2017 to 50% in 2026. Math went from 49% in 2017 to 34% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year
Petaluma
California
2015
65% 663 tested
45% 900,059 tested
2016
67% 617 tested
48% 907,715 tested
2017
62% 638 tested
49% 915,271 tested
2018
56% 611 tested
50% 919,277 tested
2019
56% 565 tested
50% 932,985 tested
2022
56% 485 tested
48% 852,094 tested
2023
52% 432 tested
47% 842,173 tested
2024
42% 408 tested
47% 849,026 tested
2025
52% 450 tested
49% 848,364 tested
2026
50% 465 tested
50% 838,600 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year
Petaluma
California
2015
47% 660 tested
33% 901,801 tested
2016
51% 621 tested
36% 910,145 tested
2017
49% 639 tested
37% 918,964 tested
2018
40% 614 tested
37% 921,089 tested
2019
40% 567 tested
37% 935,223 tested
2022
35% 485 tested
31% 853,132 tested
2023
33% 433 tested
32% 844,737 tested
2024
32% 420 tested
33% 853,781 tested
2025
35% 449 tested
35% 851,806 tested
2026
34% 466 tested
37% 838,896 tested
Ask: English is lower than in 2015 here (65% to 50%), while across California it went from 45% to 50%. How does the school check what’s working in English?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
15 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
12in 100 at the average Petaluma Joint Union High school18in 100 at the average California middle school
76 of 502 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school15 in 100
at the average Petaluma Joint Union High school12 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
2.8%of students were suspended at least once (14 of 508), 2025–26
2.6%at the average Petaluma Joint Union High school3.7%at the average California middle school
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Petaluma works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Petaluma. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
172 English · 173 math tested
English
30% / 39%
Math
20% / 26%
White
308 English · 307 math tested
English
56% / 62%
Math
40% / 50%
Hispanic or Latino
117 English · 119 math tested
English
36% / 40%
Math
18% / 25%
Students with disabilities
91 tested per subject
English
12% / 14%
Math
8% / 9%
Low-income students did worse than the same group statewide in English. White students did worse than the same group statewide.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Petaluma Joint Union High
vs California
Low-income · 172 tested in English, 173 in math
English
30%
−838%
−939%
Math
20%
−626%
−626%
White · 308 tested in English, 307 in math
English
56%
−662%
−662%
Math
40%
−949%
−1050%
Hispanic or Latino · 117 tested in English, 119 in math
English
36%
−541%
−440%
Math
18%
−927%
−725%
Students with disabilities · 91 tested
English
12%
−214%
−214%
Math
8%
−19%
−19%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Petaluma Joint Union High, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
Students of two or more races and English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1White65%
2Hispanic or Latino26%
3Two or more races5%
4Asian—
5Black or African American—
6Filipino—
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share4%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
White
65%
Hispanic or Latino
26%
Two or more races
5%
Asian
—
Black or African American
—
Filipino
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 2 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (45%, 203 of 454). California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
Teachers27
Average experience16 years
First-year teachers15%
79% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 78.91%: 20.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 26.6 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
36%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school36%
California47%
8 of 22 English learners here; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Petaluma Joint Union High which school serves your address.
Petaluma Junior High is in the 50th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 38 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Petaluma Junior High was near California in English and math: 50% and 34% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Petaluma Junior High's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 50% of students tested in grades 7 and 8 met or exceeded the English standard and 34% the math standard; 13% and 17% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 50% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 465 students were tested in English and 466 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Petaluma Junior High rank in California?
Petaluma Junior High is in the 50th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Solid, 2026). Petaluma Junior High ranks #1,256 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Petaluma Junior High?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 15.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 76 chronically absent of 502 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 2.8%; 14 unduplicated suspended students of 508 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Petaluma Junior High compare to other schools in Petaluma?
Petaluma Junior High is in the 50th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 454 students. Use the schools in Petaluma page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Petaluma Junior High?
At Petaluma Junior High in Petaluma, 30% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 7–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 38% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 8 points below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 20% in math; White students, 56% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 172 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 47 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 51 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 54 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 2.3pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.8% · index 54 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 17.5% · index 32 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 7
235
14%
42%
21%
23%
56%
51%
+5
Grade 8
230
12%
32%
26%
30%
44%
49%
−5
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 7
236
19%
22%
27%
32%
41%
38%
+3
Grade 8
230
15%
12%
28%
45%
27%
36%
−9
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
224
50.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
226
52.6%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
223
40.8%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
226
29.2%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
217
43.3%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
191
41.4%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
222
38.7%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
198
24.8%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
204
47.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
228
56.1%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
206
36.4%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
227
29.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
231
61.0%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
254
52.4%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
231
39.4%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
254
30.7%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
298
62.1%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
267
50.2%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
296
47.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
271
33.2%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
280
53.2%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
331
58.6%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
279
42.6%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
335
38.5%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
337
58.2%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
301
66.1%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
338
47.0%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
301
50.5%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
305
59%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
312
75%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
307
47%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
314
54%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
307
69%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
356
62%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
306
51%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
354
44%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
230
7%
21%
54%
17%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
172
30%
−8
−9
White
308
56%
−6
−6
Hispanic/Latino
117
36%
−5
−4
03More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Additional workforce records
Properly assigned intern credential holders5.2%
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
7.5%
9.7%
—
2022
—
—
—
22.0%
7.6%
—
2023
—
—
—
20.7%
7.9%
—
2024
—
—
—
16.6%
5.7%
—
2025
—
—
—
17.5%
2.7%
—
2026
38
50
#1256
15.2%
2.8%
—
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
— The same-year grade contrast is unavailable in this record; it is separate from the two-year aggregate comparison used for scoring.
04Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
8.2%
20.3%
+12.1pp
Male
6.6%
9.8%
+3.2pp
Hispanic/Latino
7.3%
27.7%
+20.4pp
Two or More Races
20.0%
25.0%
+5.0pp
White
6.3%
8.6%
+2.3pp
Students with Disabilities
15.8%
26.9%
+11.1pp
English Learners
8.6%
40.0%
+31.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
14.7%
29.0%
+14.3pp
All Students
7.4%
15.1%
+7.7pp
Black/African American
18.2%
—
—
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
05Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$24 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 454
Central federal expenditures attributed here$501 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 454
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
06ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94952+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94952
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$117,343
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
46.78%
ZCTA population
33,785
Median age
43.8 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94952 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.