Charter school · Petaluma Joint Union High

Dual Language Immersion Academy Charter

Petaluma · 7–8 · 31 students (2024–25)

Well below California in English and math: 31% and 10% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 7 and 8: 49
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 838,600 in English and 838,896 in math tested).

Dual Language Immersion Academy Charter has no 2026 Scope Score.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

How strong are the foundations for high school?

Advanced (exceeded)Proficient (met)Below Proficient

English

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
4%
Proficient
27%
Below Proficient
69%

31% proficient or advanced · 49 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaPetaluma Joint Union High
Advanced4%19%18%
Proficient27%31%37%
Developing26%23%25%
Minimal43%27%20%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

See each grade’s results →

Math

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
4%
Proficient
6%
Below Proficient
90%

10% proficient or advanced · 49 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaPetaluma Joint Union High
Advanced4%21%22%
Proficient6%16%20%
Developing27%23%28%
Minimal63%40%30%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

See each grade’s results →

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Read English and math separately, then look at progress and the courses students can take.

Ask: How do students get support, choose courses, and prepare for the move to high school?

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school31%
California50%

Tested: 49 here · 838,600 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school31%
Petaluma Joint Union High55%

Tested: 49 here · 1,440 in Petaluma Joint Union High. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 5 schools.

Math

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school10%
California37%

Tested: 49 here · 838,896 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school10%
Petaluma Joint Union High42%

Tested: 49 here · 1,434 in Petaluma Joint Union High. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 5 schools.

Progress over time

How are results changing through the middle years?

Ask: Most students in grades 7 and 8 haven’t yet met the state’s standards in English and math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?

Life at school

How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

18 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26

9 of 49 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school18 in 100
5.9%of students were suspended at least once (3 of 51), 2025–26

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Proficient or Advanced · grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

42 tested per subject

English26% / 39%
Math7% / 26%

Hispanic or Latino

47 tested per subject

English30% / 40%
Math11% / 25%

Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students did worse than the same groups statewide in math.

All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Petaluma Joint Union Highvs California
Low-income · 42 tested
English26%−1238%−1339%
Math7%−1926%−1926%
Hispanic or Latino · 47 tested
English30%−1141%−1040%
Math11%−1627%−1425%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Petaluma Joint Union High, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.

English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2025–26 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

1. Hispanic or Latino: 96%Unallocated share: 4%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Hispanic or Latino96%
  2. White—
  3. Asian—
  4. Black or African American—
  5. Filipino—
  6. Two or more races—
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  8. Pacific Islander—
  9. Not reported—
  10. Unallocated share4%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.
Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26Here
Hispanic or Latino96%
White—
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 3 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (61%, 19 of 31). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers1
Average experience1 years
First-year teachers100%

English learners

Are English learners making progress in English?

75%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school75%
California47%

15 of 20 English learners here; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

  1. ElementaryDual Language Immersion Academy CharterThis campus · grades 7-8
  2. MiddleDual Language Immersion Academy CharterThis campus · grades 7-8
  3. High schoolLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Petaluma Accelerated Charter

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    99th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

High-school links

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Ask Dual Language Immersion Academy Charter how it admits students.

Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

School website: petalumacityschools.org ↗Office: (707) 778-4621Principal: Ruth Miller

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗
421 South Mcdowell Boulevard, Petaluma 94954

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

  1. Most students in grades 7 and 8 haven’t yet met the state’s standards in English and math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
  2. Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
  3. How do students get academic help and connect with a trusted adult?
  4. Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

Before you apply

Confirm this school’s current process directly.

Eligibility and entry grades
Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
Application and lottery
What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?
The daily logistics
What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Accountability

Who runs this school

What the charter school plans (2025–26 plan)

Dual Language Immersion Academy Charter is a charter school that CDE lists as locally funded, through its district. CDE lists Petaluma Joint Union High as its charter authorizer, and June 30, 2028 as the end of its current charter term.

Authorizer from CDE’s charter term file; term from CDE’s Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source ↗ · Database ↗

$11.8 million

planned for 32 funded actions in 5 goals. These are plans, not what the charter school later spent.

The 2025–26 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s LCAP (122 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 48% of the money: ELD Training/​Support/ Implementation (BRT/​ELRT), Social-Emotional Support and Expanded Learning Opportunities. By the plan’s own split, 80% of it pays for staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

$3.5 million, or 29% of the plan, is in actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners. The other 71% is in actions whose titles name none of these.

  • Reading $1.1 million
  • Catch-up help $1.3 million
  • English learners $2.0 million

Largest of these

  • ELD Training/​Support/ Implementation (BRT/​ELRT)$2.0 million
  • Targeted TK-6 Reading Intervention$945,054
  • Secondary Intervention$299,974

An action that names two of these counts under both, and once in the total.

What its goals measure

These are the state’s figures for this school on the measures its goals track. They describe the school; they can’t tell you what the plan caused.

Measure2024–252025–26
Met or exceeded the standard in EnglishGoals 1, 3 and 431%31%
Met or exceeded the standard in mathGoals 1 and 323%10%
Chronically absentGoal 228 in 10018 in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 29.4%5.9%

Goal 5 isn’t shown because it tracks named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan itself5 goals, 55 measures, the money map

Where does the money go?

52% to Goal 1, All students will graduate PCS college and career ready. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars. Tap a box to open its goal.

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1All students will graduate PCS college and career ready$6.2 million52% of action budgets

16 funded actions · p. 16 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Expanded Learning Opportunities$1.7 millionaction 1.13 · p. 78 ↗
  2. Staff Development Days$1.3 millionaction 1.1 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is LCFF funding counted toward the requirement
  3. Targeted TK-6 Reading Intervention$945,054action 1.4 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Monitoring Student Achievement$704,948action 1.2 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Additional Library Services$381,000action 1.15 · p. 79 ↗

11 more funded actions in this goal

  • College and Career Pathways Development · action 1.6 · p. 78 ↗$326,362
  • Secondary Intervention · action 1.8 · p. 78 ↗$299,974
  • New Teacher/​Admin Support (Induction Fees) · action 1.14 · p. 78 ↗$114,624
  • Development of Ethnic Studies Course · action 1.11 · p. 78 ↗$84,000
  • Early Literacy Training · action 1.3 · p. 77 ↗$65,000
  • Diversify Curriculum & Classroom Libraries · action 1.16 · p. 79 ↗$60,000
  • Open Access to AP/​Honors/​Adv Courses & GATE Identification · action 1.10 · p. 78 ↗$50,300
  • Summer School · action 1.9 · p. 78 ↗$50,000
  • Preparing for College Parent Education Classes (PIQE) · action 1.12 · p. 78 ↗$40,000
  • Continuous Improvement Committee · action 1.5 · p. 78 ↗$25,000
  • Academic Counseling Calibration · action 1.7 · p. 78 ↗$10,000

How the plan measures it · 22 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 16 ↗.

Goal 2 · Focus GoalBy January of 2027, the percent of students who respond positively to the following YouthTruth question will…$2.8 million24% of action budgets

“By January of 2027, the percent of students who respond positively to the following YouthTruth question will increase by 12%: “When I’m feeling upset, stressed, or having problems, there is an adult from school who I can talk to about it.”” p. 38 ↗

4 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Social-Emotional Support$2.0 millionaction 2.3 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Chronic Absenteeism$723,461action 2.2 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Culture and Climate$120,000action 2.1 · p. 79 ↗
  4. School Safety Training$18,500action 2.5 · p. 79 ↗

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 38 ↗.

Goal 3 · Focus GoalBy June 2027, students with disabilities will improve in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics by at…$256,8862% of action budgets

“By June 2027, students with disabilities will improve in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics by at least 30 points, moving from -90 to -60 in ELA and -124 to -94 in mathematics” p. 46 ↗

3 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Common Assessments Specifically for SWD$144,386action 3.8 · p. 80 ↗
  2. Orton Gillingham Reading Instruction Training$70,000action 3.1 · p. 80 ↗
  3. Goal Book Platform$42,500action 3.5 · p. 80 ↗

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • Parent Participation in Programs Percent Positives on Youth Truth Family Survey Question: “I feel engaged with my school." p. 48 ↗
    Baseline
    2024 All families: 60% …
    Target for year 3
    Maintain <5% difference between all families and families of students with disabilities

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Focus GoalBy June 2027, 95% of multilingual learners, enrolled in Petaluma City Schools for at least 4 years, will…$2.3 million20% of action budgets

“By June 2027, 95% of multilingual learners, enrolled in Petaluma City Schools for at least 4 years, will reclassify as fluent English proficient (RFEP) within 7 years of entering a US school” p. 52 ↗

6 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. ELD Training/​Support/ Implementation (BRT/​ELRT)$2.0 millionaction 4.1 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.9 million is LCFF funding counted toward the requirement
  2. Translation Services$150,000action 4.4 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Goals$119,491action 4.7 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $19,491 is LCFF funding counted toward the requirement
  4. Designated and Integrated ELD$19,491action 4.3 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Implement the English Learner Master Plan$17,055action 4.2 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

How the plan measures it · 12 measures · 2 quoted

  • Percent of MLLs Reclassified within 7 years with at least 4 years of enrollment in PCS (Illuminate) p. 53 ↗
    Baseline
    2023 87%
    Target for year 3
    2027 95%
  • Reclassification Rate (CALPADS) p. 53 ↗
    Baseline
    2023 15.6%
    Target for year 3
    2027 20%

10 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalPCS will institute a system of support that ensures outcomes for San Antonio High School on the California…$224,8142% of action budgets

“PCS will institute a system of support that ensures outcomes for San Antonio High School on the California School Dashboard will improve for outcomes on the College/​Career, Graduation Rate, and Suspension Rate indicators. By June of 2027, the percent of students showing that they are prepared for College and Career as measured on the College/​Career Indicator on the California School Dashboard will increase from 0% to 10%. Graduation Rates: By June 2027, the Graduation Rate for San Antonio High School will increase at least 17% from 51.1% to at least 68.0% (2023- 51.1% on dashboard) School Climate: By June of 2025 the suspension rate for all students will decrease from 9.6% to less than 6%. While suspension rates for all students is 9.6%, students with disabilities have a rate at 11.4%. By the end of 2025, the suspension rate for students with disabilities will decrease to less than 6%, matching the expectation for all students” p. 59 ↗

3 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Coordinator of Alternative Schools$127,814action 5.1 · p. 81 ↗
  2. Academic Counselor$60,000action 5.3 · p. 81 ↗
  3. Suspension Diversion$37,000action 5.2 · p. 81 ↗

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 3 quoted

  • College Career Indicator p. 60 ↗
    Baseline
    0% 2023
    Target for year 3
    At least 10%
  • Graduation Rate Indicator p. 60 ↗
    Baseline
    51.1% 2023
    Target for year 3
    At least 68%
  • Suspension Rate Indicator p. 60 ↗
    Baseline
    9.6% 2023
    Target for year 3
    Less than 6%

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Common questions

Why does SchoolScope show no score for Dual Language Immersion Academy Charter?

Dated CDE assessment records appear below when available. SchoolScope displays this profile without a combined score, band, or rank for 2026.

See the dated CDE rows in the source record. Reported results do not by themselves supply a SchoolScope score or rank.

Other options

If this school isn’t the fit

The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby middle schoolsStatewide percentile

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Source records

Explore the data

Available school measures and source details, shown without a score or rank.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Dated CDE assessment records appear below when available. SchoolScope displays this profile without a combined score, band, or rank for 2026.

01CDE assessment recordsCDE CAASPP 2026 · raw grade–subject rows

From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.

All Grades is an aggregate, not another group of students. Same-year grade groups are not matched children. An unavailable or suppressed result is marked as missing; it does not establish a reported zero.

CDE CAASPP test year 2026 · all-students reporting group · publisher grade–subject records.
Grade · subjectStudents tested with scoresProficient or AdvancedAdvancedProficientDevelopingMinimalMean scale score
Grade 7 · ELA · 20262817.86%0%17.86%25%57.14%2466.2
Grade 8 · ELA · 20262147.62%9.52%38.1%28.57%23.81%2551.8
All Grades · ELA · 20264930.61%4.08%26.53%26.53%42.86%Unavailable
Grade 7 · Math · 2026283.57%3.57%0%28.57%67.86%2446.8
Grade 8 · Math · 20262119.05%4.76%14.29%23.81%57.14%2489
All Grades · Math · 20264910.2%4.08%6.12%26.53%63.27%Unavailable
By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students

ELA · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELATestedAdvancedProficientDevelopingMinimalProficient or Advanced
Grade 7280%18%25%57%18%
Grade 82110%38%28%24%48%

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
MathTestedAdvancedProficientDevelopingMinimalProficient or Advanced
Grade 7284%0%28%68%4%
Grade 8215%14%24%57%19%

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA2931.0%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math3023.3%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDevelopingMinimal
Schoolwide210%24%67%10%

CAST is an independent assessment. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4226%——
Hispanic/Latino4730%——
English Learners150%——
03More measuressource records · no composite history

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2025 · 28.1% → 2026 · 18.4% · −9.7pp
Suspension rate2025 · 9.4% → 2026 · 5.9% · −3.5pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresAdvancedProficient or Advanced
2026 · ELA494.1%30.6%
2026 · Math494.1%10.2%
2025 · ELA293.5%31.0%
2025 · Math306.7%23.3%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.

CDE CAASPP 2026: 4 individual grade–subject records; 4 records with a positive known tested count.

0 grade–subject counts unavailable; 0 grade–subject attainment rates unavailable. SchoolScope does not publish a Scope Score, band, or rank for this peer class in 2026.

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years
Group2018–192025–26
Female—15.4%
Male—21.7%
Hispanic/Latino—19.1%
Students with Disabilities—8.3%
English Learners—13.6%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged—21.4%
All Students—18.4%

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

Central federal expenditures attributed here$501 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 31

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94954
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94954
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$113,527
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)38.39%
ZCTA population37,574
Median age45.3 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94954 →

What we can't show
  • — No Scope Score: the composite a score is built from isn't on file for this school this year, so no score, band or rank publishes.
  • — Our own growth index and the comparisons to nearby schools are built from that same composite, so they don't publish either — California's separate matched-student growth model is not, and still appears below wherever CDE reports it.

Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · Data updated 2026-10-15. An unavailable or suppressed result is marked as missing; it does not establish a reported zero.

Data source: California Department of Education for CAASPP 2025–26 assessments only. SchoolScope publishes no Scope Score, band or rank for this school for 2026. Neighborhood context: ACS 2024. The enrollment count has no verified year here; staffing and finance show their separate sources and periods beside those figures. Data updated 2026-10-15.methodology · data updates · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction