Public school · Los Angeles Unified · North Hills, California

Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology — Rating & test scores

North Hills · TK–5 · 421 students (2024–25)

16825 Napa Street, 91343partheniaes.lausd.org ↗(818) 891-6955
59thpercentileSolid

The dots are California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built →

Scope Score
40

Weighted composite · 2025–26
A weighted mix of six measures.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Below California in English (reading and writing), near in math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 38% and 40% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.

Source
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 184 in English, 183 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 3, 4 and 5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).

From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, with building heights from LA County. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 13% of students tested in English scored Advanced, against 24% across California. Advanced is the top of the state’s four levels.

Sources
The sentence above
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026. All students tested in grades 3–5. California: CDE’s grade 3, 4 and 5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English tested).

Common questions

How do I get in?

If Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology is the school for your address, you don’t apply: you register with LAUSD. Check which school serves your address first. Evidence ↓

Is Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology a good elementary school?

Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology scores higher than 59 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools: 59th percentile, Solid, spring 2026. Evidence ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 23 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 20 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school. 0 of 444 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. Evidence ↓

More questions (4)

Did students here score above what the state expected?

In English, below what the state expected; in math, about as expected. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored −15 points against the state’s expected score in English, which the state calls Moderate. In math, they scored −1 point, which it calls Average.

  • Included in this measure: 110 students

Evidence ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 37% of low-income students in grades 3–5 at Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology in North Hills scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 36% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓

What do families and students say?

93% of families agreed or strongly agreed with “My child is safe on school grounds” (LAUSD elementary schools 91%, 254 answered).

  • 78% of students agreed or strongly agreed with “I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions” (LAUSD elementary schools 77%, 120 answered)
  • Source: Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey, 2025–26

Evidence ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓

Academic achievement

How did students here do on state tests?

Below California in English; near it in math.

State tests (CAASPP), spring 2026

In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 38% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 40% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.

Source
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 184 in English, 183 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grades 3–5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English, 1,211,701 in math tested). The comparisons use the same grades and year.
AdvancedProficientBelow the standard

English

Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 184 tested

Advanced
13%
Proficient
25%
Below the standard
62%
This school38%
California46%
Los Angeles Unified46%

38% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.

Math

Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 183 tested

Advanced
18%
Proficient
22%
Below the standard
60%
This school40%
California42%
Los Angeles Unified44%

40% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.

Results for each grade, spring 2026English and math · grades 3–5 · every level, with tested counts

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced44%27%43%
Advanced14%8%16%
Proficient30%19%27%
Developing level23%23%21%
Minimal33%50%36%
Tested666058
California44%46%49%
Difference0−19−6

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced47%29%43%
Advanced21%8%24%
Proficient26%21%19%
Developing level27%37%21%
Minimal26%34%36%
Tested665958
California47%42%37%
Difference0−13+6

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →

School patterns · grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · What patterns mean

Grade-to-grade gainsFrom grade 3 in spring 2024 to grade 5 in spring 2026, results here rose more than at the average California elementary school. Students move in and out, so these are partly different children. The Score factors record below gives the figure.
On the riseThe share of students at the state’s top two levels rose in both English and math across the three springs to 2026. The Every tested year record gives each year.

Have results changed?

English results were higher than in 2025; math results were similar. English went from 30% to 38% and math from 37% to 40%.

English · top two levels · grades 3–5

202530%191 tested
→
202638%184 tested

This school

California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested

Math · top two levels · grades 3–5

202537%193 tested
→
202640%183 tested

This school

California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested

Each year is a different group of students.

Did students here score above what the state expected?

In English, below what the state expected; in math, about as expected. California sets an expected score for each student from that student’s own score the year before. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored −15 points against that expected score in English, which the state calls Moderate. In math, they scored −1 point, which it calls Average.

Source
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4 and 5: 110
Comparison
Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Grades 4 and 5 · 2025 · 110 students with scores in both years

Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.

−15 pts

English

The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

−1 pts

Math

The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.

Ask: What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?

All four levelsThe state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal, with tested counts
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 3–5 · This school13%25%22%40%184
English, grades 3–5 · California24%22%21%33%1,208,894
English, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified23%23%22%32%108,229
Math, grades 3–5 · This school18%22%28%32%183
Math, grades 3–5 · California21%21%25%33%1,211,701
Math, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified22%22%25%31%108,401

Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.

English and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Each grade’s results: English ↑ · Math ↑

Results since 20178 tested years shown · English and math have been below California in every tested year since 2017

Chart and table: 2017–2026.

English top two levels, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202638%46%
Math top two levels, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202640%42%

The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.

In grades 3–5, the share at the state’s top two levels in English went from 36% in 2017 to 38% in 2026. In math, it went from 26% in 2017 to 40% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.

Each year’s results and tested counts

English · top two levels · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201736%
292 tested		45%
1,384,680 tested
201838%
289 tested		49%
1,346,907 tested
201940%
264 tested		50%
1,332,547 tested
202236%
201 tested		45%
1,260,830 tested
202335%
196 tested		44%
1,247,801 tested
202428%
196 tested		45%
1,235,509 tested
202530%
191 tested		46%
1,232,086 tested
202638%
184 tested		46%
1,208,894 tested
Math · top two levels · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201726%
293 tested		40%
1,392,040 tested
201831%
290 tested		42%
1,352,321 tested
201934%
266 tested		44%
1,338,625 tested
202227%
204 tested		38%
1,265,943 tested
202333%
204 tested		40%
1,256,519 tested
202429%
197 tested		41%
1,249,262 tested
202537%
193 tested		41%
1,241,652 tested
202640%
183 tested		42%
1,211,701 tested
How the state’s growth measure worksPoints above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 15 points below that expected score, and in math 1 point below it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.

What you can do

Who can act on Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology’s results?

Los Angeles Unified’s board decides Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology’s plan.

The state hasn’t placed Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

What has the state flagged?

The state is giving Los Angeles Unified extra help in 2026. It qualified on the 2025 California School Dashboard. The county office must help the district for at least three years, including a review of its yearly plan.

Extra help for Los Angeles Unified: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2025 California School Dashboard. Source 

When is the plan set, and how can you take part?

Los Angeles Unified’s board must adopt its yearly plan (LCAP) by July 1, after at least one public hearing at an earlier meeting.

How to take part

  • Watch the board’s agenda: the hearing is posted at least 72 hours ahead.
  • Send written comments on the actions and spending the plan proposes.
  • Raise questions through the district’s parent advisory committee; the superintendent must answer its comments in writing.
  • Read the midyear report, due by February 28.
  • Read Los Angeles Unified’s 2026–27 plan (LCAP, PDF) 
Reading screening in kindergarten through grade 2What the law requires, and what to ask

California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.

Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.

If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.

Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.

California Education Code § 53008. Source 

Life at school

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

23 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26.

State attendance and suspension records, 2025–26

That means they missed 10% or more of school days. 0 of 444 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school.

Context Close to the 20 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school: a pattern across the district.

Source
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism and suspension files, 2025–26
Students
chronic absence: 97 of 428 students counted for it; suspension: 0 of 444 students enrolled during the year
Comparison
Each comparison is the rate at the average school (our average of school rates), not a pooled rate. Also: suspensions at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school 0.2%.

Chronically absent, 2025–26

23 in 100This school
20 in 100At the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school
17 in 100At the average California elementary school

97 of 428 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.

Suspensions, 2025–26

0 of 444

students were suspended at least once. Average California elementary school 1.6%.

Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?

What people say

What do students, families and staff say?

LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26

This schoolLAUSD elementary schools, same questionsEach bar 0–100%

Students

121 of 125 students answered (97%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question78%LAUSD elementary 77% · 120 answered
Belonging · average of 5 questions67%LAUSD elementary 68% · 118–121 answered each
Caring adults · average of 8 questions77%LAUSD elementary 75% · 117–121 answered each
Engagement · average of 6 questions64%LAUSD elementary 68% · 119–121 answered each
High expectations · average of 2 questions87%LAUSD elementary 84% · 120–121 answered each
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days · average of 4 questions26%LAUSD elementary 24% · 117–121 answered eachShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.
All 43 student questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%77%120
Belonging
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%78%121
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed72%74%121
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed72%72%120
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed70%72%118
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed46%42%120
Caring adults
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%78%121
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed73%69%119
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed75%70%117
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%73%121
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%71%120
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%80%119
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%78%118
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%79%119
Engagement
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed80%81%120
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed64%67%119
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed48%55%121
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed71%72%121
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed72%74%120
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed51%59%121
High expectations
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%88%120
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%81%121
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it36%31%121
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it28%30%120
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it25%25%120
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it14%12%117
Other questions
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed83%82%119
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed55%54%120
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%80%119
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree”——0
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”79%78%120
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”77%75%120
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”74%74%120
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed65%64%120
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”59%61%119
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”48%49%118
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”63%65%116
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”67%72%121
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”79%75%121
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”66%56%119
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”77%72%121
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”71%70%121
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”79%78%121

“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Families

264 of 316 family surveys came back (84%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question93%LAUSD elementary 91% · 254 answered
Belonging · average of 4 questions94%LAUSD elementary 94% · 254–263 answered each
Caring adults · average of 2 questions96%LAUSD elementary 94% · 260–261 answered each
Engagement · average of 3 questions93%LAUSD elementary 91% · 260–263 answered each
Bullying reports taken seriously · 1 question82%LAUSD elementary 80% · 256 answered
All 34 family questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%254
Belonging
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%92%261
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%96%261
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%94%254
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%94%263
Caring adults
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%94%260
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%95%261
Engagement
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%94%263
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%89%263
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%91%260
Bullying reports taken seriously
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%80%256
Other questions
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%89%260
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%90%260
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%94%260
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%85%256
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%91%256
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed81%79%264
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%89%263
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%87%264
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%92%262
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%263
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%95%255
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%87%261
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%88%256
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%95%263
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%87%236
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%91%254
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%254
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%259
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%86%264
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%83%242
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%88%230
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%92%256
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%82%256

Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Staff

64 of 64 staff answered (100%), 27 of them teachers · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question95%LAUSD elementary 97% · 63 answeredShare giving one of the two most positive answers.
Caring adults · average of 2 questions88%LAUSD elementary 89% · 61–64 answered each
High expectations · average of 2 questions87%LAUSD elementary 95% · 61–62 answered each
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem · 1 question79%LAUSD elementary 86% · 63 answeredShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem.
All 43 staff questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayShare giving one of the two most positive answers95%97%63
Caring adults
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed80%84%64
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%94%61
High expectations
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%95%62
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%95%61
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem79%86%63
Other questions
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%84%63
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed62%84%63
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed75%81%63
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%95%63
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolShare giving one of the two most positive answers92%88%63
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed75%85%64
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed61%82%64
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed66%75%64
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”74%86%62
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”73%80%60
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%81%62
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%80%61
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%75%60
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem94%93%63
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—75%19
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year”——18
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—75%18
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—84%18
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—86%18
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—88%8
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”14%16%22
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”54%50%22
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”68%59%22
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”46%51%22
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”46%66%22
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed83%79%23
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed78%79%23
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed96%94%23
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed96%91%23
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed68%74%22
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed78%74%23
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed65%71%23
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed83%75%23
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed70%77%23
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed78%81%23
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed70%76%23
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed78%88%23

“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Know this school? Add your answers

Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology works for your family.

Answer the family questionsResponder en español

Work here? Answer 8 questions about Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology as a workplace, with your Los Angeles Unified work email.

Answer the staff questions

Ask: Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?

About the survey and these figuresWho answers, what we show, and how a theme figure is made

Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades.

LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group only when at least 10% of it responded, so the answers speak for more than the few who chose to reply.

Each row shows the percentage its label describes. For a theme, such as one marked “average of 5 questions”, we average the percentages for its questions, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. Each lane lists every question with its own percentage.

Every learner

How do kids like mine do here?

Student groups, grades 3–5, spring 2026

Source
Source
California Department of Education, CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
grades 3–5; each row gives its tested count. Low-income is CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged”.
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s rows for the whole state combined and weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Parthenia Academy of Arts and TechnologySame group, California
  • Low-incomeEnglish · 170 tested37%Same group, California 36%
  • Low-incomeMath · 170 tested38%Same group, California 31%
  • Hispanic or LatinoEnglish · 163 tested36%Same group, California 36%
  • Hispanic or LatinoMath · 162 tested38%Same group, California 31%
  • English learnersEnglish · 49 tested8%Same group, California 13%
  • English learnersMath · 48 tested19%Same group, California 16%

Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–5, spring 2026.

Who are the students?

2025–26 · students counted
1. Hispanic or Latino: 83%2. White: 4%3. Not reported: 4%4. Black or African American: 4%Unallocated share: 5%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Hispanic or Latino83%
  2. White4%
  3. Not reported4%
  4. Black or African American4%
  5. Asian—
  6. Filipino—
  7. Two or more races—
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  9. Pacific Islander—
  10. Unallocated share5%
A dash means the share isn’t available; it isn’t zero. The unallocated share is what’s left after the shares we have; it isn’t a student group. “Not reported” is different: it is a category in the state’s own count of students. Source and comparisons: the full student mix below.

Are English learners moving up on the state’s English test?

48% of English learners here moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026.

Spring 2025 to spring 2026 · English learners with state English test (ELPAC) scores in both years

This school · 40 of 83 English learners48%
Los Angeles Unified · 24,781 of 47,33052%
California · 355,274 of 748,91647%

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.

Who are the families and teachers?

90%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 380 of 421. California: 63%.

21teachers, 2024–25

19 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25

14%in their first year, 2024–25

100%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22

Ask: Which student groups does the school track most closely, and what does it do when one falls behind?

All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–5 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Los Angeles Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 170 tested
English37%−340%+136%
Math38%−139%+731%
Hispanic or Latino · 163 tested in English, 162 in math
English36%−541%036%
Math38%−139%+731%
English learners · 49 tested in English, 48 in math
English8%−412%−513%
Math19%+217%+316%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

Students with disabilities, 31 tested: no rate for grade 3 in our records, and fewer than 30 tested in the grades with one. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Full student mix, comparisons and sources, 2025–26
Students, 2025–26Here
Hispanic or Latino83%
White4%
Not reported4%
Black or African American4%
Asian—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

How the credential rate is counted

CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 100% of teaching positions, 23 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 23 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Next steps

What comes after Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology, and how do I get in?

Vista Middle, then Panorama High.

Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology’s attendance zone is split: 58% of its children are assigned to Vista Middle and the other 42% to Oliver Wendell Holmes Middle; 54% to Panorama High and the other 46% to James Monroe High. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

  1. Elementary · this school
    Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology
    Grades TK–5
  2. Middle · part of the zone
    Vista Middle
    43rd · Developing · 202658% of the zone’s children

    Or Oliver Wendell Holmes Middle for the other 42% (88th · Strong · 2026).

  3. High · part of the zone
    Panorama High
    32nd · Developing · 202554% of the zone’s children

    Or James Monroe High for the other 46% (14th · Needs Support · 2025).

From the district’s 2026 attendance boundaries. Shares are our estimate of where the zone’s children live, from 2020 Census child counts, or land area where few children were counted; they describe children living in the zone, not a school’s enrolled students. A boundary doesn’t guarantee placement: transfers, permits, magnets and Choices can change the path. Check your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Vista Middle

    Assigned for part of the zone

    43rd percentile · Developing · middle · 2026

    58% of the zone’s children

  • Oliver Wendell Holmes Middle

    Assigned for part of the zone

    88th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    42% of the zone’s children

High-school links

  • Panorama High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    32nd percentile · Developing · high · 2025

    54% of the zone’s children

  • James Monroe High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    14th percentile · Needs Support · high · 2025

    46% of the zone’s children

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

Where the path ends: Panorama High
Panorama High32nd · Developing · 2025 · Scope Score 50district-published assignment for part of the zone

The road from this school ends at Panorama High. UC records 48 enrollees from Panorama High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 10 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Panorama High around 2036, and a school can change a lot in 10 years. By the state’s 2023 count, 46% of the students who finished high school at Panorama High enrolled in college within 12 months, UC or not.

48 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 10 authorized AP courses (AP Course Audit 2025–26) → full record on Panorama High's page
Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

Applying to Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology for 2027–28

  1. If Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology is the school for your address, you don’t apply: you register with LAUSD. Check which school serves your address first.

    LAUSD Resident School Identifier ↗

  2. On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026 and join the end of the waitlist.

    apply.lausd.net ↗

Compare with other schools

How Choices, lotteries and waitlists work

School website: partheniaes.lausd.org ↗Office: (818) 891-6955Administrator: Anna Gonzalez

Location and visiting

Get directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
16825 Napa Street, North Hills 91343

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm which school serves your address with Los Angeles Unified.

Questions for your visit

  1. What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working? 62% in English and 60% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grades 3–5, spring 2026 (184 tested in English, 183 in math); California: 54% and 58%
  2. When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon? 23 in 100 chronically absent, 2025–26 (97 of 428 students); average Los Angeles Unified elementary school: 20 in 100
  3. Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?
  4. What extra help do English learners get, and how do you know it’s working? 8% of English learners scored Proficient or Advanced in English, grades 3–5, spring 2026 (49 students tested); the same group across California: 13%
  5. When a bullying report comes in, who handles it, and how is the family told? 26% (the average share reporting being bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days, across 4 survey questions), 2025–26; LAUSD elementary schools: 24%
  6. What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Office (818) 891-695516825 Napa Street, directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)

Nearby elementary schoolsClosest first, by straight-line distance

The closest elementary schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby elementary schoolsPercentile among California elementary schools, 2026

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map

Source records

Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #2,299 of 5,726 California elementary schools we score · #272 of 581 in Los Angeles Unified
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math15%4442%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math39%4723%
5th graders in 2026 against 3rd graders in 2024 (partly different children)+90 scale-score pts7520%
Chronically absent23 in 100415%
Suspension rate0 of 444635%
English learners: top level6%355%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–264059#2299California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–1917 in 1000.2% (1 of 621)−6
2021–22not on filenot on file−7
2022–23not on filenot on file+12
2023–2422 in 1000 of 500+3
2024–2523 in 1000 of 474−6
2025–2623 in 1000 of 444−2

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 3 and grade 5 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English18412%38%
2026 · Math18318%40%
2025 · English19110%30%
2025 · Math19312%37%
2024 · English1969%28%
2024 · Math19710%29%
2023 · English19612%35%
2023 · Math20414%33%
2022 · English20112%36%
2022 · Math20411%27%
2019 · English26418%40%
2019 · Math2669%34%
2018 · English28913%38%
2018 · Math2908%31%
2017 · English2927%36%
2017 · Math2937%26%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 3 · English6834%
2025 · Grade 4 · English6522%
2025 · Grade 5 · English5836%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math6853%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math6719%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math5838%
2024 · Grade 3 · English6223%
2024 · Grade 4 · English6730%
2024 · Grade 5 · English6731%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math6327%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math6737%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math6724%
2023 · Grade 3 · English6629%
2023 · Grade 4 · English6321%
2023 · Grade 5 · English6755%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math7044%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math6713%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math6742%
2022 · Grade 3 · English6535%
2022 · Grade 4 · English6332%
2022 · Grade 5 · English7341%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math6636%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math6430%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math7418%
2019 · Grade 3 · English9138%
2019 · Grade 4 · English8444%
2019 · Grade 5 · English8938%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math9143%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math8527%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math9031%
2018 · Grade 3 · English8938%
2018 · Grade 4 · English8739%
2018 · Grade 5 · English11336%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math9046%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math8733%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math11318%
2017 · Grade 3 · English9635%
2017 · Grade 4 · English11736%
2017 · Grade 5 · English7937%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math9536%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math11820%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math8024%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide585%14%71%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income17037%−3+1
Hispanic or Latino16336%−50
English learners498%−4−5
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students−15110Moderate−1110Average
Low-income−15100Moderate+2100Average
Hispanic or Latino−1293Moderate+193Average
English-only students−1650not categorized−350not categorized
English learners−1049Moderate+949Accelerated
Recently reclassified as fluent in English−528not categorized+1328not categorized
Students with disabilities−2423Minimal−2223Minimal
English learners only−1721not categorized+621not categorized

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure, and grade 5 against the same school’s grade 3 two years earlier, partly different children · two different measures

Grade 5 in 2026 against grade 3 in 2024 · English

English · 2024 · Grade 3
13%
exceeded standard · 23% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 62 English test records with scores
English · 2026 · Grade 5
16%
Advanced · 43% Proficient or Advanced
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 58 English test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 58 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English−15 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4 and 5

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4 and 5

110 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, English: −15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

State model · math−1 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4 and 5

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4 and 5

110 students

CDE growth category: Average

California growth model, math: −1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Average, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median English estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 23 in 100 → 2025–26 · 23 in 100 · 0 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0 of 474 → 2025–26 · 0 of 444 · 0.0 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female18 in 10022 in 100+4 in 100
Male15 in 10024 in 100+9 in 100
Asian29 in 100——
Black or African American18 in 10024 in 100+6 in 100
Filipino15 in 100——
Hispanic or Latino16 in 10024 in 100+8 in 100
Two or more races36 in 100——
White11 in 1006 in 100−5 in 100
Students with disabilities24 in 10029 in 100+5 in 100
English learners21 in 10017 in 100−4 in 100
Homeless44 in 100——
Low-income17 in 10024 in 100+7 in 100
All students17 in 10023 in 100+6 in 100

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,180 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$2,744 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 421

Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 421

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 17%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$5,655,379,38451.81%52%
Instruction support$1,791,152,34816.41%17%
Student services$1,344,873,23212.32%12%
Administration$763,652,7807.00%7%
Buildings & maintenance$1,099,649,06210.07%10%
Other$260,356,5952.39%2%
Total$10,915,063,400100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $10,915,063,400 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,180 per pupil
2020$16,355 per pupil
2019$15,793 per pupil
2018$13,247 per pupil
2017$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 91343 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 91343 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$81,430
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)26%
ZIP-area population60,783
Median age36.7 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 91343 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/parthenia-academy-of-arts-and-technology-8691"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Parthenia Academy of Arts and Technology — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyze · Request a correction