Math
39%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Public elementary school
Parks (Rosa) Elementary
No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
51% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 39% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Building Momentum
What this means for your family
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(415) 749-3519
DistrictSan Francisco Unified
PrincipalLaura Schmidt-Nojima
GradesTK-5
Enrollment326 students
English
51%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
326Total enrollment
Chronic absence
36%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 41% | 45% |
| 2022 | 35% | 39% |
| 2023 | 44% | 48% |
| 2024 | 23% | 31% |
| 2025 | 39% | 51% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
20%ProficientStandard Met
20%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
21%MinimalStandard Not Met
40%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
25%ProficientStandard Met
26%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
18%MinimalStandard Not Met
32%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Slipped from the 53rd to the 32nd percentile since 2019.
Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Parks (Rosa) deserves a closer read. Three in five of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
150 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 46 tracked
Parks (Rosa) Elementary scores 29 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 32nd percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 40% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
ELAYellow(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 38% | 37% | 52% | 33% | 52% |
| Grade 4 | 43% | 49% | 23% | 33% | 32% |
| Grade 5 | 53% | 41% | 44% | 29% | 49% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 43% | 39% | 52% | 29% | 48% |
| Grade 4 | 28% | 33% | 16% | 33% | 25% |
| Grade 5 | 39% | 30% | 36% | 16% | 33% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
One in three of students here meet the standard. One in five clear it by a lot.
ELA44% met or exceeded
Exceeded 20%Met 24%Nearly Met 16%Not Met 40%
Math34% met or exceeded
Exceeded 16%Met 18%Nearly Met 23%Not Met 43%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 29 | 19% | 40% | Weak · p33 | 36.0% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | Average · p50 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope2939
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+40%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Weak · p33Average · p50
Absence36.0%17.9%
Suspension1.1%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model splits here — the 73rd percentile in reading against the 51st in math, among elementary schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 73rd percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 51st in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 33rd. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
24%
exceeded standard · 52% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
18%
exceeded standard · 49% met or exceeded
n = 46
returning cohort
returning cohort
Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.
Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 33rd percentile among California elementary schools.33rd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 73rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.73rd pctile · +8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 51st percentile of 7,518 reported schools.51st pctile · +1 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Parks (Rosa) Elementary in San Francisco, 23.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Parks (Rosa) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 15.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.5% Math proficient); Two or More Races students (80.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.7 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 86 students tested.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 15 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 39% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 39%, district —, state 43%39%
MaleMale: this school 37%, district 49%, state 42%37% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 17%, district 36%, state 32%17% · −22 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 42%, district 50%, state 44%42% · +3 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 70%, district 63%, state 56%70% · +31 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 11%, district 15%, state 26%11% · −28 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 22%, state 32%33% · −6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 19%, state 15%8% · −31 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 23%, district 10%, state 11%23% · −16 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 46%, district 69%, state 72%46% · +7 vs school
5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 7.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
English Only68 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +3 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 68 students.+3 pts · 0 vs typical
Low-income students63 studentsLow-income students, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 63 students.+9 pts · +9 vs typical
Math
English Only68 studentsEnglish Only, math: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 68 students.−1 pts · −2 vs typical
Low-income students63 studentsLow-income students, math: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 63 students.−1 pts · 0 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 9 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 22 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher22 · district 22
Teaching staff16 teachers
Avg. experience13.4 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers19%
PrincipalLaura Schmidt-Nojima
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$69,525 – $131,654
Principal salary$150,963 – $163,648
Superintendent salary$328,879
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.
36.0% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 17.9% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — the data can't say why.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 36.0%, district 25.8%, state 17.9%36.0% · +18.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 1.6%1.1% · −0.5pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–637.7%
TK/K46.8%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $27,203 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$363 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,203, CA average $14,491$27,203 · spent at this school
Federal share$363 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 60%Instruction support 12%Student services 15%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 7%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,416 per pupil
2019$17,139 per pupil
2018$17,228 per pupil
2017$13,640 per pupil
2016$11,532 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Three in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino27.0% · district 36.7% · CA 56.1%
White8.9% · district 13.1% · CA 19.9%
Asian16.9% · district 27.7% · CA 10.2%
Black19.6% · district 7.3% · CA 4.8%
Other27.6% · district 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch62.6% · CA 64%
Median income$152K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.68M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+74% · CA 35%
ZIP population32,629
Median age37 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Find contact and visit details →Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parks (Rosa) Elementary | Public | Developing | 19% | 40% | School being viewed | |
| Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila | Public | Strong | 59% | 81% | 1.3 mi | |
| Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | Public | Strong | 56% | 82% | 2.7 mi | |
| Peabody (George) Elementary | Public | Strong | 53% | 80% | 1.9 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with San Francisco Unified.
District information →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
Brown Jr. (Willie L) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 42/100
Giannini (A.P.) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 63/100
Aptos MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 57/100
Francisco MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 33/100
Hoover (Herbert) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 51/100
Denman (James) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 26/100
Lick (James) MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 25/100
Marina MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 47/100
King Jr. (Martin Luther) Academic MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 24/100
Presidio MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 65/100
Roosevelt MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 65/100
Visitacion Valley MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 12/100
Everett MiddlePublished boundary overlapScope Score 12/100
High school · 9–12
Marshall (Thurgood) HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 25/100
Lincoln (Abraham) HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 66/100
Balboa HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 60/100
Galileo HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 58/100
Washington (George) HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 68/100
Lowell HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 87/100
Mission HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 34/100
O'Connell (John) HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 29/100
Wallenberg (Raoul) Traditional HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 59/100
Burton (Phillip and Sala) Academic HighPublished boundary overlapScope Score 55/100
The road from this school ends at Marshall (Thurgood) High, which sent 5 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 5 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Marshall (Thurgood) High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 57% of Marshall (Thurgood) High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
5 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 5 AP subjects taught → full record on Marshall (Thurgood) High's page
Source: UC & College Board
Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Parks (Rosa) Elementary a good elementary school?
Parks (Rosa) Elementary has a Scope Score of 29 out of 100, placing it in the 32nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,905 statewide. 18.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Parks (Rosa) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 39.7% of students at Parks (Rosa) Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.6% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 300 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Parks (Rosa) Elementary rank in California?
Parks (Rosa) Elementary ranks #3,905 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 32nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Parks (Rosa) Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Parks (Rosa) Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks weak among California elementary schools — roughly the 33rd percentile, behind the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Parks (Rosa) Elementary?
36.0% of students at Parks (Rosa) Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Parks (Rosa) Elementary compare to other schools in San Francisco?
Parks (Rosa) Elementary scores 29/100 (32nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 326 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Parks (Rosa) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Parks (Rosa) Elementary in San Francisco, 23.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Parks (Rosa) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 15.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.5% Math proficient); Two or More Races students (80.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.7 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 86 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Parks (Rosa) Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Parks (Rosa) Elementary is zoned to Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle, Giannini (A.P.) Middle, and Aptos Middle. Scope Scores: Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle 42, Giannini (A.P.) Middle 63, Aptos Middle 57 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 6 things our score weighs
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 65 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 18.6% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 39.7% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Weak | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 36.0% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.1% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 4.5% | 18.0% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Parks (Rosa) Elementary: reading the evidence
Parks (Rosa) posts 40% meeting the standard and 18.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.4% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Parks (Rosa) Elementary is ranked #3,905 statewide · #50 of 74 in San Francisco Unified.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 18.6% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 39.7% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Weak | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 36.0% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.1% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 4.5% | 18.0% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 47 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 48 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
- ↓ vs CA average · 33rd pctile
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 17.9% · index 21 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 1.1pp higher vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 54 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.3pp higher vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↓ vs CA 18.0% · index 33 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42 | 33% | 19% | 26% | 21% | 52% | +9 |
| Grade 4 | 53 | 11% | 21% | 13% | 55% | 32% | −13 |
| Grade 5 | 55 | 18% | 31% | 11% | 40% | 49% | +1 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42 | 21% | 26% | 21% | 31% | 48% | +2 |
| Grade 4 | 53 | 9% | 15% | 28% | 47% | 25% | −17 |
| Grade 5 | 55 | 18% | 15% | 20% | 47% | 33% | −2 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 55 | 9% | 24% | 38% | 29% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 86 | 23.3% | −16 | −15 |
| Two or More Races | 30 | 80.0% | +12 | +19 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 23 | 34.8% | +9 | −4 |
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parks (Rosa) Elementary ← | — | 29 | 18.6% | 39.7% | −9.1pp | +65 pts | 1.1% |
| Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila | 1.3 mi | 82 | 59.2% | 81.0% | +25.6pp | — | 0.1% |
| Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | 2.7 mi | 76 | 55.5% | 81.7% | +2.6pp | — | 0.1% |
| Peabody (George) Elementary | 1.9 mi | 71 | 52.9% | 79.8% | +12.5pp | — | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 37 | 53 | #2595 | 22.0% | 40.5% | 18.5% | 0.1% | +5.9pp |
| 2022 | 34 | 53 | #2666 | 15.5% | 38.2% | 42.4% | 0.3% | -1.9pp |
| 2023 | 33 | 50 | #2847 | 18.6% | 37.3% | 43.3% | 2.2% | -12.1pp |
| 2024 | 23 | 14 | #4908 | 11.6% | 28.8% | 34.9% | 0.9% | -8.3pp |
| 2025 | 29 | 32 | #3905 | 18.6% | 39.7% | 36.0% | 1.1% | -9.1pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 15 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 18.8% | 39.1% | +20.3pp |
| Male | 19.3% | 36.6% | +17.3pp |
| Asian | 10.0% | 19.6% | +9.6pp |
| Black/African American | 39.8% | 57.1% | +17.3pp |
| Filipino | 14.3% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 17.0% | 48.9% | +31.9pp |
| Two or More Races | 12.9% | 28.6% | +15.7pp |
| White | 13.5% | 17.2% | +3.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 37.1% | 37.5% | +0.4pp |
| English Learners | 11.7% | 30.8% | +19.1pp |
| Homeless | 30.8% | 80.0% | +49.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 29.3% | 51.0% | +21.7pp |
| All Students | 19.0% | 37.8% | +18.8pp |
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +8 | 99 | Accelerated | +1 | 99 | Average |
| English Only | +3 | 68 | not categorised | −1 | 68 | not categorised |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +9 | 63 | Accelerated | −1 | 63 | Average |
| Black or African American | −6 | 25 | Moderate | −10 | 25 | Moderate |
| English Learner | +19 | 23 | Accelerated | +11 | 23 | Accelerated |
| Hispanic or Latino | +13 | 23 | Accelerated | −1 | 23 | Average |
| Students with Disabilities | −7 | 21 | Moderate | −13 | 21 | Moderate |
| English Learners Only | +14 | 17 | not categorised | +6 | 17 | not categorised |
| Two or More Races | +17 | 16 | Accelerated | +1 | 16 | Average |
| White | +10 | 15 | Accelerated | +10 | 15 | Accelerated |
| Asian | −5 | 12 | Average | −5 | 12 | Average |
| Homeless Youth | −25 | 11 | Minimal | −8 | 11 | Moderate |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/parks-rosa-elementary-1503"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Parks (Rosa) Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction