Oak Hillshigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Oak Hillshigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Oak Hillshigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 81% and 76% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 323 in English, 324 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
This rating covers grades 3–5. Oak Hills Elementary teaches TK–6: grade 6 results ↓
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
54%
Proficient
22%
Below Proficient
24%
76% proficient or advanced · 324 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
54%
21%
36%
Proficient
22%
21%
26%
Developing
18%
25%
21%
Minimal
6%
33%
17%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
48%
Proficient
34%
Below Proficient
18%
82% proficient or advanced · 96 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
48%
20%
45%
Proficient
34%
28%
27%
Developing
11%
24%
16%
Minimal
7%
28%
12%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
50%
Proficient
21%
Below Proficient
29%
71% proficient or advanced · 96 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
50%
21%
47%
Proficient
21%
16%
21%
Developing
19%
25%
15%
Minimal
10%
38%
17%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–6 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 4–6 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–6: 256
Comparison
256 students in grades 4–6 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About 3 in 5 reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
59%English · exceeded the standard54%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 323 in English, 324 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Low-income students here (122 tested, grades 3–6, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (36% and 30%).grades 3–6 · spring 2026
74%English · met or exceeded65%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–6: 122
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 122 students.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school81%
California46%
Tested: 323 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school81%
Newhall69%
Tested: 323 here · 2,490 in Newhall. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 10 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
59%
24%
43%
Proficient
22%
22%
26%
Developing
10%
21%
15%
Minimal
9%
33%
16%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school76%
California42%
Tested: 324 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school76%
Newhall62%
Tested: 324 here · 2,490 in Newhall. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 10 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
54%
21%
36%
Proficient
22%
21%
26%
Developing
18%
25%
21%
Minimal
6%
33%
17%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school82%
California48%
Tested: 96 here · 415,439 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school82%
Newhall72%
Tested: 96 here · 842 in Newhall. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 10 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
48%
20%
45%
Proficient
34%
28%
27%
Developing
11%
24%
16%
Minimal
7%
28%
12%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school71%
California37%
Tested: 96 here · 415,904 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school71%
Newhall68%
Tested: 96 here · 839 in Newhall. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 10 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Newhall
Advanced
50%
21%
47%
Proficient
21%
16%
21%
Developing
19%
25%
15%
Minimal
10%
38%
17%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Grades 3–5 are well above California. Grade 6 are also well above it.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Oak HillsCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID81%46%
Oak HillsCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Oak HillsCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID76%42%
Oak HillsCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English was 81% in both 2017 and 2026. Math went from 78% in 2017 to 76% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Oak Hills
California
2015
78% 265 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
84% 284 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
81% 330 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
82% 330 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
78% 297 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
79% 261 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
80% 250 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
83% 250 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
79% 297 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
81% 323 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Oak Hills
California
2015
71% 264 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
82% 279 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
78% 332 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
79% 330 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
74% 299 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
74% 261 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
78% 250 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
75% 250 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
75% 300 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
76% 324 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure256 students · grades 4–6 · 2025
English+18ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+16ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 18 points above that prediction, and in math 16 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
10 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
8in 100 at the average Newhall school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
75 of 765 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school10 in 100
at the average Newhall school8 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0.1%of students were suspended at least once (1 of 769), 2025–26
0.4%at the average Newhall school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–6 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
122 tested per subject
English
74% / 36%
Math
65% / 30%
Asian
126 tested per subject
English
92% / 71%
Math
90% / 71%
White
116 English · 117 math tested
English
80% / 60%
Math
73% / 54%
Hispanic or Latino
97 tested per subject
English
68% / 37%
Math
56% / 30%
Two or more races
41 tested per subject · grades 3 and 4 and 6
English
76% / 59%
Math
66% / 55%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–6 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Newhall
vs California
Low-income · 122 tested
English
74%
+1856%
■+3836%
Math
65%
+1649%
■+3530%
Asian · 126 tested
English
92%
+191%
+2171%
Math
90%
+486%
+1971%
White · 116 tested in English, 117 in math
English
80%
080%
+2060%
Math
73%
−174%
+1954%
Hispanic or Latino · 97 tested
English
68%
+1454%
■+3137%
Math
56%
+947%
■+2630%
Two or more races · 41 tested · grades 3 and 4 and 6 only
English
76%
−581%
+1759%
Math
66%
−1076%
+1155%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Newhall, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students here did far better than the same groups statewide.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Oak Hills Elementary in Valencia, 73.8% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 56.0% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Oak Hills Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (64.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (92.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 19.5 percentage points: Two or More Races students in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 122 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian31%
2White27%
3Hispanic or Latino21%
4Two or more races8%
5Not reported5%
6Filipino5%
7Black or African American3%
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share<1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
31%
White
27%
Hispanic or Latino
21%
Two or more races
8%
Not reported
5%
Filipino
5%
Black or African American
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (24%, 160 of 660). California: 63%.
95% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 95.43%: 20.8 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 21.8 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 16.2–32.2% meal eligibility and 330–1,320 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Oak Hills Elementary a good elementary school?
Oak Hills Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 80 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Oak Hills Elementary was well above California in English and math: 81% and 76% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Oak Hills Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 81% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 76% the math standard; 59% and 54% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 323 students were tested in English and 324 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Oak Hills Elementary rank in California?
Oak Hills Elementary is in the 97th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Oak Hills Elementary ranks #137 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Oak Hills Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Oak Hills Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 92nd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Oak Hills Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 9.8% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 75 chronically absent of 765 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.1%; 1 unduplicated suspended students of 769 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 10.1%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.2%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Oak Hills Elementary compare to other schools in Valencia?
Oak Hills Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 660 students. Use the schools in Valencia page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Oak Hills Elementary?
At Oak Hills Elementary in Valencia, 73.8% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 56.0% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Oak Hills Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (64.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (92.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 19.5 percentage points: Two or More Races students in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 122 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 85 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 78 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈92nd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 2.2pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 62 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 75 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
100
61%
24%
5%
10%
85%
+42
Grade 4
126
56%
18%
16%
10%
75%
+30
Grade 5
97
60%
27%
6%
7%
87%
+39
Grade 6
96
48%
34%
10%
7%
82%
+36
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
100
55%
24%
11%
10%
79%
+33
Grade 4
127
46%
28%
23%
4%
73%
+32
Grade 5
97
63%
12%
19%
6%
75%
+40
Grade 6
96
50%
21%
19%
10%
71%
+36
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
113
72.6%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
91
76.9%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
93
88.2%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
96
86.5%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
113
73.5%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
91
72.5%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
96
79.2%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
97
80.4%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
74
78.4%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
86
81.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
90
87.8%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
106
84.9%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
74
77.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
86
69.8%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
90
78.9%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
105
75.2%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
66
74.2%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
83
73.5%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
101
89.1%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
104
84.6%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
66
78.8%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
83
72.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
101
82.2%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
104
76.9%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
74
64.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
89
85.4%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
98
84.7%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
96
78.1%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
74
68.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
89
80.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
98
71.4%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
96
67.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
84
75.0%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
109
79.8%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
104
78.8%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
132
86.4%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
85
69.4%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
109
84.4%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
105
65.7%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
134
85.1%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
100
80.0%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
97
82.5%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
133
82.7%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
97
90.7%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
100
89.0%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
97
84.5%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
133
67.7%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
97
83.5%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
98
78.6%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
133
77.4%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
99
88.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
134
88.8%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
100
82.0%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
133
74.4%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
99
78.8%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
134
78.4%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
102
83%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
89
85%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
93
85%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
81
88%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
102
84%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
89
83%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
88
80%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
81
78%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
85
68%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
94
83%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
86
83%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
85
88%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
84
74%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
94
79%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
86
59%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
85
72%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
97
47%
23%
27%
3%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
122
73.8%
+18
+38
Asian
126
92.1%
+1
+22
White
116
80.2%
+0
+20
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
69/100
90
#519
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
46.9%
75.5%
5.2%
0.5%
+0.1pp
2022
—
—
—
46.1%
76.0%
10.3%
0.7%
+11.2pp
2023
—
—
—
54.0%
78.3%
13.0%
0.1%
+9.1pp
2024
—
—
—
50.5%
78.9%
9.7%
0.3%
+5.6pp
2025
—
—
—
52.1%
77.1%
7.9%
0.1%
+10.7pp
2026
80
97
#137
56.8%
79.0%
10.1%
0.2%
-1.1pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
5.2%
10.1%
+4.9pp
Male
4.6%
9.6%
+5.0pp
Asian
0.7%
4.7%
+4.0pp
Black/African American
0.0%
12.5%
+12.5pp
Filipino
10.3%
7.9%
-2.4pp
Hispanic/Latino
9.8%
17.7%
+7.9pp
Two or More Races
3.1%
7.9%
+4.8pp
White
4.5%
10.2%
+5.7pp
Students with Disabilities
5.4%
19.1%
+13.7pp
English Learners
4.2%
2.8%
-1.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
13.7%
15.2%
+1.5pp
All Students
4.9%
9.8%
+4.9pp
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+18
256
Accelerated
+16
256
Accelerated
English Only
+16
187
not categorised
+12
187
not categorised
Asian
+24
74
Exceptional
+29
74
Exceptional
White
+7
74
Accelerated
+14
74
Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+7
68
Accelerated
+14
68
Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino
+13
61
Accelerated
+2
61
Average
English Learner
+18
32
Accelerated
+32
32
Exceptional
Students with Disabilities
−2
25
Average
+14
25
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+17
23
not categorised
+30
23
not categorised
Two or More Races
+28
19
Exceptional
+20
19
Exceptional
Filipino
+30
15
Exceptional
+16
15
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
53%
exceeded standard · 78% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 74 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
60%
exceeded standard · 87% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 97 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 74 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
256 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +18 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 93rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.93rd pctile · +18 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
256 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 87th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.87th pctile · +16 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$11,214 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 5,920 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
Central federal expenditures attributed here$220 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 660
District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,843 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 66%Instruction support 10%Student services 6%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 9%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 91381
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 91381
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$158,504
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
60.14%
ZCTA population
22,582
Median age
40.1 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.