ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Nixon (Patricia) Elementary · Cerritos

Nixon (Patricia) Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Nixon (Patricia) posts 67% meeting the standard, and 40.5% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

19600 Jacob Avenue, 90703 (opens in new tab)·ABC Unified·Cerritos·Grades TK-6·681 students·53% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 229-7895·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6045
% Exceeded41%21%
% Met+67%43%
Growth+0.6-2.9
Absence8.7%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
60
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #1,038 statewide · #8 of 19 in ABC Unified

Nixon (Patricia) Elementary scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.

Most rating sites would stop at “67% proficient” and call it done. Nixon (Patricia) deserves a closer read. The school sits in Cerritos, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Nixon (Patricia)'s low-income kids hit 61.2% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 82nd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 67% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 375%71%68%68%70%
Grade 470%68%66%68%62%
Grade 577%87%78%71%77%
Grade 682%75%75%70%70%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%73%72%76%68%
Grade 450%65%63%68%62%
Grade 546%49%57%55%62%
Grade 674%83%61%54%61%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

48%
22%
30%
Grade 3 · 70% proficient
40%
21%
39%
Grade 4 · 61% proficient
51%
26%
23%
Grade 5 · 77% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.4pp across grades; the floor rises 7.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

61.2%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Nixon (Patricia)'s most underrated number

61.2% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Nixon (Patricia) low-income: 61.2%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
40.5%
State 21.3%
19.2pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+0.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
66.8%
State 42.7%
24.1pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
8.7%
State 17.9%
9.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.8%
State 18.0%
8.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Nixon (Patricia) Elementary in Cerritos, 61.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Nixon (Patricia) Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (54.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (64.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 214 students tested.

All students at this school: 66% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 66%, district —, state 43%66%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 58%, district 48%, state 32%58% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 64%, district 58%, state 42%64% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 69%, district 60%, state 44%69% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 60%, district 43%, state 32%60% · −7 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 78%, district 76%, state 65%78% · +12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 31%, district 25%, state 15%31% · −36 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 78%, district 85%, state 72%78% · +12 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 70%, district 60%, state 56%70% · +4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 85%, district 58%, state 56%85% · +18 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
English LearnersEnglish Learners: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 8.7%, district 13.5%, state 17.9%8.7% · −9.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–67.4%
TK/K9.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 23:126:1
Teaching staff30 teachers
Avg. experience19.3 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,755 – $127,886
Principal salary$160,286 – $190,870
Superintendent salary$310,992

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,378, CA average $14,815$22,378 · spent at this school
District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,766 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support13%
Student services11%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,553 per pupil
2019$12,110 per pupil
2018$12,189 per pupil
2017$11,434 per pupil
2016$10,952 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic38.2%
District 45.7% · CA 56.1%
Other30.5%
District 19.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian15.0%
District 23.7% · CA 10.2%
White8.5%
District 4.4% · CA 19.9%
Black7.8%
District 6.6% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 52.6% (11pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$135K · CA $85K
Median home value$932K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+58% · CA 35%
ZIP population48,108
Median age48 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 54% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Nixon (Patricia) Elementary a good elementary school?

Nixon (Patricia) Elementary has a Scope Score of 60 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,038 statewide. 40.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 19.2 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Nixon (Patricia) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 66.8% of students at Nixon (Patricia) Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 40.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 40.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 598 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Nixon (Patricia) Elementary rank in California?

Nixon (Patricia) Elementary ranks #1,038 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Nixon (Patricia) Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Nixon (Patricia) Elementary increases by 0.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Nixon (Patricia) Elementary?

8.7% of students at Nixon (Patricia) Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Nixon (Patricia) Elementary compare to other schools in Cerritos?

Nixon (Patricia) Elementary scores 60/100 (82nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 681 students. Use the schools in Cerritos page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Nixon (Patricia) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Nixon (Patricia) Elementary in Cerritos, 61.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Nixon (Patricia) Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (54.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (64.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 214 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
40.5%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 69th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+0.6pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
66.8%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 68th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
8.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 65th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 39th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38248%22%20%11%70%+26
Grade 411740%21%21%17%62%+17
Grade 510051%26%9%14%77%+29
Grade 69732%38%16%13%70%+24
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38243%26%13%18%68%+23
Grade 411732%31%24%14%62%+21
Grade 510030%32%20%18%62%+27
Grade 69733%28%24%15%61%+26
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1110023%31%38%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21461.2%+7+23
Hispanic/Latino14564.1%+13+25
Filipino7081.4%+0+9
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Nixon (Patricia) Elementary ←6040.5%66.8%+0.60.6%
Margaret Landell Elementary2.5 mi8366.2%85.7%+0.20.1%
Leal (Frank C.) Elementary1.3 mi8264.2%85.4%−1.60.2%
Cerritos Elementary2.2 mi8058.5%80.1%−9.10.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195675#135837.0%65.1%3.5%0.4%-12.5pp
20225886#82236.5%69.0%21.7%0.8%-4.4pp
20236085#88738.4%67.1%15.0%0.5%-2.6pp
20246083#99839.7%67.5%11.0%0.6%-8.8pp
20256082#103840.5%66.8%8.7%0.6%+0.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.1%7.8%+3.7pp
Male2.7%8.5%+5.8pp
Asian1.5%2.9%+1.4pp
Black/African American6.8%12.7%+5.9pp
White3.5%2.6%-0.9pp
Hispanic/Latino2.6%9.2%+6.6pp
Two or More Races4.8%6.6%+1.8pp
Students with Disabilities5.3%12.2%+6.9pp
English Learners5.4%5.8%+0.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.5%11.3%+5.8pp
All Students3.4%8.2%+4.8pp
Filipino25.0%
Pacific Islander25.0%
Military-Connected6.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction