Navelenciahigher than 77 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Navelenciahigher than 77 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Navelenciahigher than 77 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English, near it in math: 63% and 42% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 283 in English, 285 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
In 2025, students in grades 6–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Exceptional in English and Accelerated in math.grades 6–8 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 281
Comparison
281 students in grades 6–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
9.0% of students (28 of 312) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school.2025–26
9.0%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Source
CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students
all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 312
Comparison
28 of 312. District and California figures are averages of school rates (4 Kings Canyon Joint Unified schools; 2,532 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
Low-income students here (250 tested in English, 252 in math, grades 6–8, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (39% and 26%).grades 6–8 · spring 2026
60%English · met or exceeded38%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 6–8: 250 in English, 252 in math
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 250 students in English and 252 in math.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
NavelenciaCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID63%49%
NavelenciaCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
NavelenciaCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID42%37%
NavelenciaCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 48% in 2017 to 63% in 2026. Math went from 32% in 2017 to 42% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Navelencia
California
2015
47% 291 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
49% 331 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
48% 350 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
49% 382 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
44% 372 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
42% 345 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
51% 328 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
54% 324 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
61% 304 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
63% 283 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Navelencia
California
2015
30% 291 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
36% 334 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
32% 352 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
32% 385 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
31% 375 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
25% 346 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
35% 328 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
42% 329 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
46% 308 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
42% 285 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure281 students · grades 6–8 · 2025
English+27ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+15ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 27 points above that prediction, and in math 15 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Ask: Most students in grades 6–8 haven’t yet met the state’s standard in math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
9 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
9in 100 at the average Kings Canyon Joint Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
28 of 311 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school9 in 100
at the average Kings Canyon Joint Unified school9 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
9.0%of students were suspended at least once (28 of 312), 2025–26
8.6%at the average Kings Canyon Joint Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
4
4 of 97
Grades 7–8
11
24 of 214
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Navelencia works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Navelencia. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
250 English · 252 math tested
English
60% / 39%
Math
38% / 26%
Hispanic or Latino
259 English · 260 math tested
English
61% / 39%
Math
40% / 25%
English learners
62 English · 64 math tested
English
23% / 7%
Math
9% / 7%
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students here did far better than the same groups statewide.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Kings Canyon Joint Unified
vs California
Low-income · 250 tested in English, 252 in math
English
60%
+357%
■+2139%
Math
38%
−543%
■+1226%
Hispanic or Latino · 259 tested in English, 260 in math
English
61%
+259%
■+2239%
Math
40%
−444%
■+1525%
English learners · 62 tested in English, 64 in math
English
23%
+1013%
■+167%
Math
9%
−110%
+27%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Kings Canyon Joint Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino92%
2White7%
3Asian—
4Black or African American—
5Filipino—
6Two or more races—
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
92%
White
7%
Asian
—
Black or African American
—
Filipino
—
Two or more races
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 9 in 10 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (89%, 279 of 313). California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
Teachers18
Average experience12 years
First-year teachers6%
70% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 69.50%: 9.6 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 13.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
67%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school67%
Kings Canyon Joint Unified49%
California47%
42 of 63 English learners here; 894 of 1,809 in Kings Canyon Joint Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Reedley High. UC records 25 enrollees from Reedley High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 13 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Reedley High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 79% of Reedley High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Navelencia Middle is in the 77th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 51 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Navelencia Middle was well above California in English, near it in math: 63% and 42% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Navelencia Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 63% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 42% the math standard; 24% and 20% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 283 students were tested in English and 285 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Navelencia Middle rank in California?
Navelencia Middle is in the 77th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Strong, 2026). Navelencia Middle ranks #570 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Navelencia Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Navelencia Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 91st percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Navelencia Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 9.0% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 28 chronically absent of 311 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 9.0%; 28 unduplicated suspended students of 312 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Navelencia Middle compare to other schools in Reedley?
Navelencia Middle is in the 77th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 313 students. Use the schools in Reedley page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Navelencia Middle?
At Navelencia Middle in Reedley, 60% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 57% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 3 points above the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 38% in math; Hispanic students, 61% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 250 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Navelencia Middle feed into?
By the district's published attendance boundaries, Navelencia Middle is zoned to Reedley High. Reedley High is in the 77th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the district’s published 2026 attendance boundaries; districts redraw them, and they are approximate at the edges. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: district attendance boundaries, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results and student-group measures, with source details.
↑ vs CA 17.7% · index 55 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↑ vs CA average · ≈91st calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 62 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 1.2pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 30 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.3pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 63 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
89
22%
33%
27%
18%
55%
48%
+7
Grade 7
90
24%
38%
26%
12%
62%
51%
+11
Grade 8
104
24%
45%
20%
11%
69%
49%
+20
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
89
19%
30%
25%
26%
49%
37%
+12
Grade 7
91
15%
19%
34%
32%
34%
38%
−4
Grade 8
105
26%
17%
27%
30%
43%
36%
+7
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
96
55.2%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
107
64.5%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
101
63.4%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
97
42.3%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
107
39.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
104
55.8%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
104
47.1%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
102
65.7%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
118
49.1%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
106
37.7%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
104
49.0%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
119
40.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
99
51.5%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
122
41.8%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
107
60.8%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
99
43.4%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
122
28.7%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
107
35.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
112
32.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
111
46.0%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
122
47.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
113
31.0%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
110
28.2%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
123
17.1%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
119
38.7%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
126
42.1%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
127
49.6%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
119
32.8%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
128
33.6%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
128
27.3%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
129
38.8%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
128
46.9%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
125
63.2%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
131
30.5%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
129
30.2%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
125
36.8%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
119
38.7%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
127
51.2%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
104
55.8%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
119
29.4%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
127
34.6%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
106
33.0%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
121
42%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
98
54%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
112
52%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
122
25%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
99
46%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
113
40%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
95
41%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
112
51%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
84
49%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
95
19%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
112
48%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
84
20%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
105
11%
26%
59%
4%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
250
60%
+3
+22
Hispanic/Latino
259
61%
+2
+22
English Learners
62
23%
+10
+16
03More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Additional workforce records
Properly assigned intern credential holders4.1%
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
7.2%
7.3%
+2.8pp
2022
—
—
—
6.8%
10.2%
+0.8pp
2023
—
—
—
7.7%
11.4%
+0.7pp
2024
—
—
—
5.2%
10.6%
+2.3pp
2025
—
—
—
8.2%
10.0%
+10.8pp
2026
51
77
#570
9.5%
8.7%
+3.8pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
04Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
6.3%
11.3%
+5.0pp
Male
7.7%
6.6%
-1.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
7.0%
9.5%
+2.5pp
White
10.0%
0.0%
-10.0pp
Students with Disabilities
13.8%
11.1%
-2.7pp
English Learners
10.1%
9.6%
-0.5pp
Military-Connected
17.4%
15.0%
-2.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
7.7%
10.2%
+2.5pp
All Students
7.0%
9.0%
+2.0pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
05California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+27
281
Exceptional
+15
281
Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino
+26
259
Exceptional
+13
259
Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+24
250
Exceptional
+13
250
Accelerated
English Learner
+17
138
Accelerated
+14
138
Accelerated
English Only
+30
108
not categorised
+18
108
not categorised
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+22
98
not categorised
+16
98
not categorised
English Learners Only
−2
40
not categorised
+13
40
not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
+10
38
Accelerated
+23
38
Exceptional
Students with Disabilities
−5
28
Average
−7
28
Moderate
White
+34
18
Exceptional
+34
18
Exceptional
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
06Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
16%
exceeded standard · 47% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 104 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
24%
exceeded standard · 69% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 104 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 105 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
281 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +27 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 98th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.98th pctile · +27 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
281 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 85th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.85th pctile · +15 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
07Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$14,495 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 9,634 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$884 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 313
Central federal expenditures attributed here$603 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 313
District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,346 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
08ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 93654+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 93654
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$65,574
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
16.98%
ZCTA population
31,876
Median age
33.2 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93654 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.