Mesa Verdehigher than 76 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Mesa Verdehigher than 76 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Mesa Verdehigher than 76 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English, above in math: 59% and 45% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 557
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
In 2025, students in grades 6–8 scored below what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Moderate.grades 6–8 · 2025
Ask: Students scored below what the state expected from their earlier scores. What is the school doing differently for them?
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 553
Comparison
553 students in grades 6–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
6.1% of students (35 of 573) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, about one and a half times the rate at the average California middle school.2025–26
6.1%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Source
CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students
all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 573
Comparison
35 of 573. District and California figures are averages of school rates (2 Moorpark Unified schools; 2,532 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have been above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
Mesa VerdeCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID59%49%
Mesa VerdeCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
Mesa VerdeCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID45%37%
Mesa VerdeCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 67% in 2017 to 59% in 2026. Math went from 49% in 2017 to 45% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Mesa Verde
California
2015
61% 675 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
60% 682 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
67% 673 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
65% 674 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
60% 657 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
57% 560 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
52% 543 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
49% 550 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
54% 565 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
59% 557 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Mesa Verde
California
2015
48% 671 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
49% 683 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
49% 671 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
51% 673 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
48% 658 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
45% 559 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
37% 544 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
36% 555 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
39% 568 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
45% 557 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure553 students · grades 6–8 · 2025
English−7ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math−6ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 7 points below that prediction, and in math 6 points below it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026On the RiseReading and math results have improved across three reporting years. This describes a recent record, not a prediction or proof of what caused it.
Ask: Most students in grades 6–8 haven’t yet met the state’s standard in math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
10 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
11in 100 at the average Moorpark Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
54 of 571 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school10 in 100
at the average Moorpark Unified school11 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
6.1%of students were suspended at least once (35 of 573), 2025–26
5.9%at the average Moorpark Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
9
17 of 186
Grades 7–8
10
37 of 385
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Mesa Verde works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Mesa Verde. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
181 tested per subject
English
34% / 39%
Math
19% / 26%
Hispanic or Latino
259 English · 260 math tested
English
39% / 39%
Math
27% / 25%
White
226 tested per subject
English
75% / 62%
Math
58% / 50%
Asian
33 tested per subject · grades 7 and 8
English
85% / 76%
Math
76% / 71%
Students with disabilities
83 tested per subject
English
11% / 14%
Math
8% / 10%
Low-income students did worse than the same group statewide in math.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Moorpark Unified
vs California
Low-income · 181 tested
English
34%
−135%
−539%
Math
19%
−120%
−726%
Hispanic or Latino · 259 tested in English, 260 in math
English
39%
−140%
039%
Math
27%
+126%
+225%
White · 226 tested
English
75%
075%
+1362%
Math
58%
−361%
+850%
Asian · 33 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English
85%
+184%
+976%
Math
76%
−278%
+571%
Students with disabilities · 83 tested
English
11%
−112%
−314%
Math
8%
08%
−210%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Moorpark Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino47%
2White41%
3Asian7%
4Two or more races4%
5Black or African American—
6Filipino—
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share2%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
47%
White
41%
Asian
7%
Two or more races
4%
Black or African American
—
Filipino
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 3 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (32%, 184 of 574). California: 63%.
61% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 60.70%: 15.6 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 25.8 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
43%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school43%
Moorpark Unified49%
California47%
12 of 28 English learners here; 199 of 408 in Moorpark Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Moorpark High. UC records 21 enrollees from Moorpark High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 25 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Moorpark High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 78% of Moorpark High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Mesa Verde Middle is in the 76th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 51 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Mesa Verde Middle was well above California in English, above in math: 59% and 45% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Mesa Verde Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 59% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 45% the math standard; 24% and 26% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 557 students were tested in English and 557 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Mesa Verde Middle rank in California?
Mesa Verde Middle is in the 76th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Strong, 2026). Mesa Verde Middle ranks #607 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Mesa Verde Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Mesa Verde Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 78th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Mesa Verde Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 9.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 54 chronically absent of 571 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 6.1%; 35 unduplicated suspended students of 573 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Mesa Verde Middle compare to other schools in Moorpark?
Mesa Verde Middle is in the 76th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 574 students. Use the schools in Moorpark page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Mesa Verde Middle?
At Mesa Verde Middle in Moorpark, 34% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 35% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 1 point below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 19% in math; Hispanic students, 39% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 181 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Mesa Verde Middle feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Mesa Verde Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Moorpark High and The High School at Moorpark College. Moorpark High is in the 60th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. The High School at Moorpark College is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 17.7% · index 58 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↑ vs CA average · ≈78th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 61 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 1.2pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 41 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 2.2pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 45 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
180
17%
41%
25%
17%
58%
48%
+10
Grade 7
202
27%
35%
22%
16%
62%
51%
+11
Grade 8
175
29%
29%
18%
24%
58%
49%
+9
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
180
23%
22%
25%
30%
45%
37%
+8
Grade 7
202
27%
25%
24%
24%
52%
38%
+14
Grade 8
175
27%
11%
21%
41%
38%
36%
+2
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
199
57.3%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
171
54.4%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
195
50.3%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
202
44.1%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
171
40.4%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
195
33.3%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
167
47.9%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
193
48.2%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
190
51.0%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
170
37.6%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
194
29.4%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
191
40.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
192
45.8%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
183
52.5%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
168
57.7%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
192
25.5%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
183
42.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
169
46.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
182
51.6%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
166
61.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
212
59.0%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
181
40.3%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
166
50.0%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
212
44.3%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
213
52.6%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
219
64.4%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
225
61.8%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
213
41.8%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
220
50.5%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
225
52.0%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
221
60.6%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
222
70.7%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
231
64.5%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
221
42.5%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
221
54.3%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
231
56.7%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
216
63.4%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
221
68.3%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
236
70.3%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
215
43.7%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
221
52.5%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
235
50.2%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
213
59%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
234
67%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
235
54%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
214
49%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
234
55%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
235
43%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
234
64%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
220
57%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
221
61%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
234
49%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
218
46%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
219
48%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
175
20%
18%
46%
16%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
181
34%
−1
−5
Hispanic/Latino
259
39%
−1
−0
White
226
75%
−0
+13
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
7.5%
2.9%
+9.7pp
2022
—
—
—
20.8%
3.7%
+5.7pp
2023
—
—
—
13.9%
6.6%
+16.3pp
2024
—
—
—
9.9%
3.9%
+2.9pp
2025
—
—
—
8.6%
3.8%
-8.9pp
2026
51
76
#607
9.7%
6.0%
-3.7pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
6.2%
8.6%
+2.4pp
Male
8.5%
10.4%
+1.9pp
Asian
3.1%
0.0%
-3.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
6.3%
10.2%
+3.9pp
Two or More Races
2.4%
4.2%
+1.8pp
White
10.2%
11.2%
+1.0pp
Students with Disabilities
10.2%
14.6%
+4.4pp
English Learners
9.1%
18.8%
+9.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
10.2%
16.3%
+6.1pp
All Students
7.4%
9.5%
+2.1pp
Filipino
0.0%
—
—
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
−7
553
Moderate
−6
553
Moderate
English Only
−5
397
not categorised
−5
397
not categorised
Hispanic or Latino
−11
249
Moderate
−16
249
Moderate
White
−8
227
Moderate
−3
227
Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
−17
179
Moderate
−15
179
Moderate
English Learner
−15
116
Moderate
−17
116
Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
−19
94
not categorised
−20
94
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
−28
85
Minimal
−19
85
Moderate
Asian
+13
43
Accelerated
+16
43
Accelerated
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
+3
24
Average
−19
24
Moderate
Two or More Races
0
24
Average
+4
24
Average
English Learners Only
−8
22
not categorised
−15
22
not categorised
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
20%
exceeded standard · 48% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 167 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
29%
exceeded standard · 58% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 175 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 169 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
553 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: −7 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 23rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.23rd pctile · −7 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
553 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: −6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 30th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.30th pctile · −6 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$11,521 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 5,845 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$17 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 574
Central federal expenditures attributed here$776 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 574
District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,389 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 57%Instruction support 10%Student services 12%Administration 10%Buildings & maintenance 11%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 93021+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 93021
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$147,636
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
44.17%
ZCTA population
37,746
Median age
39.6 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93021 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.