Manuel De Vargas Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Manuel De Vargas posts 63% meeting the standard, and 36.5% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 60 | 37% | 63% | +4.7 | 12.9% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Manuel De Vargas Elementary scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 83rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “63% proficient” and call it done. Manuel De Vargas deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 23.6% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Slipped from the 94th to the 83rd percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 63% meet the standard today, versus 70% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53% | 63% | 59% | 62% | 58% |
| Grade 4 | 59% | 64% | 55% | 58% | 61% |
| Grade 5 | 86% | 69% | 67% | 81% | 67% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 69% | 67% | 74% | 65% | 68% |
| Grade 4 | 72% | 64% | 62% | 63% | 56% |
| Grade 5 | 82% | 57% | 61% | 69% | 69% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.4pp across grades; the floor rises 8.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Manuel De Vargas Elementary in San Jose, 40.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 61.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Manuel De Vargas Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 20.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.2% Math proficient); Asian students (75.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.9 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 76 students tested.
6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 7.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +1.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (26.0% vs 9.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$891 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 50% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Manuel De Vargas Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Manuel De Vargas Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Manuel De Vargas Elementary rank in California?
Is Manuel De Vargas Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Manuel De Vargas Elementary?
How does Manuel De Vargas Elementary compare to other schools in San Jose?
How does Manuel De Vargas Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 91
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 87
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 76
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 62 | 31% | 27% | 19% | 23% | 58% | +15 |
| Grade 4 | 49 | 33% | 29% | 14% | 24% | 61% | +16 |
| Grade 5 | 54 | 37% | 30% | 11% | 22% | 67% | +19 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 65 | 38% | 29% | 17% | 15% | 68% | +22 |
| Grade 4 | 50 | 36% | 20% | 34% | 10% | 56% | +14 |
| Grade 5 | 54 | 44% | 24% | 17% | 15% | 69% | +33 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 54 | 19% | 31% | 43% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 76 | 40.8% | −20 | +3 |
| Asian | 92 | 75.8% | −12 | +1 |
| English Learners | 52 | 23.6% | −12 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel De Vargas Elementary ← | — | 60 | 36.5% | 63.0% | +4.7 | 1.0% |
| Murdock-Portal Elementary | 0.7 mi | 92 | 78.7% | 95.1% | +1.8 | 0.1% |
| John Muir Elementary | 1.7 mi | 90 | 69.8% | 92.1% | −3.1 | 0.5% |
| Millikin Elementary | 1.7 mi | 90 | 72.0% | 90.8% | +2.1 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 75 | 94 | #323 | 40.0% | 70.1% | 5.9% | 0.0% | +23.1pp |
| 2022 | 57 | 84 | #900 | 39.1% | 64.0% | 19.1% | 0.0% | -2.1pp |
| 2023 | 64 | 88 | #664 | 37.6% | 63.0% | 19.8% | 0.2% | -2.3pp |
| 2024 | 66 | 89 | #655 | 37.4% | 66.2% | 16.3% | 1.0% | +11.7pp |
| 2025 | 60 | 83 | #997 | 36.5% | 63.0% | 12.9% | 1.0% | +4.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.2% | 15.1% | +10.9pp |
| Male | 7.3% | 10.0% | +2.7pp |
| Asian | 3.8% | 6.1% | +2.3pp |
| Filipino | 11.1% | 5.6% | -5.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.1% | 22.5% | +8.4pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 5.3% | +5.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 11.9% | 21.4% | +9.5pp |
| English Learners | 7.9% | 9.8% | +1.9pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 9.4% | 19.5% | +10.1pp |
| All Students | 5.8% | 12.4% | +6.6pp |
| Black/African American | — | 13.3% | — |
| White | — | 28.6% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction