ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Magnolia Intermediate · Grass Valley

Magnolia Intermediate: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Magnolia Intermediate posts 46% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4843
% Exceeded17%17%
% Met+46%39%
Growth-1.5+1.5
Absence15.2%18.5%
Suspension13.9%3.7%
Scope Score
48
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #725 statewide

Magnolia Intermediate scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 68th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “46% proficient” and call it done. Magnolia Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Grass Valley, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 36th to the 68th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 600 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Maintained)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 46% of students meet the standard today, above the 37% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 647%48%30%53%54%
Grade 742%52%53%40%65%
Grade 844%60%53%50%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 628%27%21%44%32%
Grade 739%41%39%28%42%
Grade 826%34%43%40%36%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
35%
45%
Grade 6 · 55% proficient
23%
42%
35%
Grade 7 · 65% proficient
15%
33%
52%
Grade 8 · 48% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.0pp across grades; the floor slips 6.9pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
17.4%
State 16.8%
0.6pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-1.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
46.0%
State 39.3%
6.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.2%
State 18.5%
3.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
13.9%
State 3.7%
10.3pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Magnolia Intermediate in Grass Valley, 44.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Magnolia Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.1% Math proficient); White students (55.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 130 students tested.

All students at this school: 46% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 46%, district —, state 39%46%
WhiteWhite: this school 47%, district 46%, state 56%47% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 46%, district 45%, state 44%46% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 45%, district 46%, state 42%45% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 37%, state 32%34% · −12 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 37%, district 38%, state 32%37% · −9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 17%, state 15%12% · −34 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 50%, district 46%, state 56%50% · +4 vs school

6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 0.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.2%, district 12.7%, state 18.5%15.2% · −3.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 13.9%, district —, state 3.7%13.9% · +10.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.4%
Grades 7–814.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience9.0 years
Fully credentialed90%
First-year teachers11%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$54,621 – $110,652
Principal salary$130,062 – $0
Superintendent salary$185,298

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $13,353, CA average $14,815$13,353 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,048 per student

$1,048 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$14,397 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$10,714 per pupil
2019$10,411 per pupil
2018$11,061 per pupil
2017$10,500 per pupil
2016$10,092 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White68.3%
District 70.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic16.1%
District 16.2% · CA 56.1%
Other14.9%
District 13.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.5%
District 0.3% · CA 10.2%
Black0.2%
District 0.3% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 32.2% (32pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$98K · CA $85K
Median home value$551K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+33% · CA 35%
ZIP population20,552
Median age54 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 410 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Magnolia Intermediate a good middle school?

Magnolia Intermediate has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100, placing it in the 68th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #725 statewide. 17.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Magnolia Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 46.0% of students at Magnolia Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 17.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 28.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 17.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 798 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Magnolia Intermediate rank in California?

Magnolia Intermediate ranks #725 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 68th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Magnolia Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Magnolia Intermediate decreases by 1.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Magnolia Intermediate?

15.2% of students at Magnolia Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 13.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Magnolia Intermediate compare to other schools in Grass Valley?

Magnolia Intermediate scores 48/100 (68th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 410 students. Use the schools in Grass Valley page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Magnolia Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Magnolia Intermediate in Grass Valley, 44.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Magnolia Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.1% Math proficient); White students (55.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 130 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
17.4%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 51th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-1.5pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 65th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
46.0%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 55th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.2%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 55th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
13.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 9th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614220%35%25%21%54%+8
Grade 712823%42%21%14%65%+17
Grade 812915%33%35%18%47%+1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614214%18%34%35%32%−3
Grade 712820%23%30%28%42%+8
Grade 812914%22%30%34%36%+3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1112711%20%58%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13044.6%+3+6
White27455.8%+5−6
Hispanic/Latino6448.4%+4+10
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Magnolia Intermediate ←4817.4%46.0%−1.513.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193336#129311.1%37.5%10.9%6.4%-2.6pp
20224261#83811.8%43.6%36.5%7.2%+9.3pp
20235477#49314.8%40.1%29.1%8.0%+22.5pp
20244363#82615.1%42.4%19.4%11.9%-3.4pp
20254868#72517.4%46.0%15.2%13.9%-1.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.6%11.1%-3.5pp
Male7.0%19.4%+12.4pp
Hispanic/Latino6.0%19.7%+13.7pp
Two or More Races8.3%16.3%+8.0pp
Students with Disabilities15.7%26.4%+10.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.6%20.8%+5.2pp
All Students10.9%15.1%+4.2pp
Filipino26.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction