ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lincoln Junior High · Taft

Lincoln Junior High: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Lincoln posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

810 Sixth Street, 93268 (opens in new tab)·Taft City·Taft·Grades 6-8·748 students·90% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(661) 765-2127
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2743
% Exceeded7%17%
% Met+23%39%
Growth-3.2+1.5
Absence13.7%18.5%
Suspension10.0%3.7%
Scope Score
27
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,916 statewide

Lincoln Junior High scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 14th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “23% proficient” and call it done. Lincoln deserves a closer read. The school sits in Taft, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 24th to the 14th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 23% meet the standard today, versus 35% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 638%33%27%29%30%
Grade 743%39%36%29%31%
Grade 848%28%37%31%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 644%25%22%28%21%
Grade 716%12%14%11%15%
Grade 821%11%8%13%14%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
22%
70%
Grade 6 · 30% proficient
9%
22%
69%
Grade 7 · 31% proficient
24%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.5%
State 16.8%
10.3pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.2pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
23.5%
State 39.3%
15.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.7%
State 18.5%
4.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
10.0%
State 3.7%
6.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
16.6%
State 18.0%
1.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Lincoln Junior High in Taft, 27.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lincoln Junior High trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 650 students tested.

All students at this school: 24% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 24%, district —, state 39%24%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 21%, district 25%, state 32%21% · −3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 23%, state 32%20% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 24%, district 26%, state 44%24% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 28%, state 42%23% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 11%, state 11%4% · −19 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 34%, district 37%, state 56%34% · +10 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 6%, state 15%7% · −17 vs school

9 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.7%, district 13.7%, state 18.5%13.7% · −4.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 10.0%, district —, state 3.7%10.0% · +6.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.2%
Grades 7–813.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 22:119:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience11.7 years
Fully credentialed64%
First-year teachers8%
Intern / emergency permit5.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$58,493 – $114,476
Principal salary$124,533 – $0
Superintendent salary$187,037

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,060, CA average $14,815$18,060 · spent at this school
Federal share$499 per student

$499 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,490 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support7%
Student services11%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,371 per pupil
2019$12,424 per pupil
2018$12,272 per pupil
2017$11,580 per pupil
2016$11,523 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic70.3%
District 74.2% · CA 56.1%
White26.6%
District 23.0% · CA 19.9%
Other1.5%
District 1.4% · CA 9.0%
Black1.1%
District 0.8% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.5%
District 0.5% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.6% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$58K · CA $85K
Median home value$237K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+8% · CA 35%
ZIP population16,963
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 13% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lincoln Junior High a good middle school?

Lincoln Junior High has a Scope Score of 27 out of 100, placing it in the 14th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,916 statewide. 6.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.3 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lincoln Junior High's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.5% of students at Lincoln Junior High met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,438 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lincoln Junior High rank in California?

Lincoln Junior High ranks #1,916 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 14th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lincoln Junior High getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lincoln Junior High decreases by 3.2 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lincoln Junior High?

13.7% of students at Lincoln Junior High are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 10.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lincoln Junior High compare to other schools in Taft?

Lincoln Junior High scores 27/100 (14th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 748 students. Use the schools in Taft page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Lincoln Junior High serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lincoln Junior High in Taft, 27.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lincoln Junior High trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 650 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
6.5%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 39th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.2pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 36th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.5%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 37th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
10.0%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 25th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
16.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62478%22%28%42%30%−17
Grade 72019%22%34%35%31%−17
Grade 82717%24%27%43%30%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62478%13%28%51%21%−14
Grade 72002%13%26%60%15%−19
Grade 82726%8%21%64%14%−18
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112713%10%61%26%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged65027.4%−3−11
Hispanic/Latino51425.9%−3−13
English Learners2345.1%−8−5
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lincoln Junior High ←276.5%23.5%−3.210.0%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192924#15329.8%34.9%9.8%11.5%-6.7pp
2022186#20375.7%24.5%50.8%14.6%-9.9pp
20233225#16335.8%23.9%18.6%9.2%-1.9pp
20242010#19925.5%23.5%17.7%14.5%-7.0pp
20252714#19166.5%23.5%13.7%10.0%-3.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.9%13.4%+3.5pp
Male9.8%13.8%+4.0pp
Hispanic/Latino6.8%10.7%+3.9pp
Students with Disabilities16.3%29.1%+12.8pp
English Learners6.2%8.9%+2.7pp
Homeless15.7%
Military-Connected0.0%15.8%+15.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.9%14.6%+3.7pp
All Students9.8%13.6%+3.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction