ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lake Marie Elementary · Whittier

Lake Marie Elementary: Scores climb 20.3 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But the zoned next school scores lower.

Lake Marie holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

10001 Carmenita Road, 90605 (opens in new tab)·South Whittier Elementary·Whittier·Grades TK-6·186 students·87% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 944-0208·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6045
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+42%43%
Growth+20.3-2.9
Absence15.1%17.9%
Suspension1.1%1.6%
Scope Score
60
🚀 Growth Engine · Solid
ranked #1,063 statewide · #1 of 5 in South Whittier Elementary

Lake Marie Elementary scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 81st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “42% proficient” and call it done. Lake Marie deserves a closer read. The school sits in Whittier, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Lake Marie's low-income kids hit 50.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 43rd to the 81st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2100 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 42% meet the standard today, versus 49% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 342%16%30%32%38%
Grade 457%31%24%30%50%
Grade 563%50%56%19%63%
Grade 642%39%36%40%55%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 362%10%30%28%25%
Grade 447%17%23%36%38%
Grade 523%16%30%10%41%
Grade 628%8%12%10%31%

The story this school is actually telling

The trajectory · grade 3→5
+20.3pp

separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

↑ the school's value-add, not the zip code's
The next step · the zoned path
29pts

the zoned path continues to Richard L. Graves Middle, which scores 29 points lower — the data can't say why.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

17%
21%
62%
Grade 3 · 38% proficient
21%
29%
50%
Grade 4 · 50% proficient
19%
44%
37%
Grade 5 · 63% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.1pp across grades; the floor rises 25.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

50.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Lake Marie's most underrated number

50.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Lake Marie low-income: 50.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
18.8%
State 21.3%
2.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+20.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
42.2%
State 42.7%
0.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.1%
State 17.9%
2.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.6%
State 18.0%
3.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Lake Marie Elementary in Whittier, 50.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lake Marie Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (50.5% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 93 students tested.

All students at this school: 43% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 43%, district —, state 43%43%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 41%, district 29%, state 32%41% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 29%, state 32%41% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 46%, district 31%, state 44%46% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 48%, district 29%, state 42%48% · +5 vs school

6 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 16.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.1%, district 17.2%, state 17.9%15.1% · −2.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 1.6%1.1% · −0.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (22.0% vs 11.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.2%
TK/K22.0%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Richard L. Graves Middle, which scores 29 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Lake Marie Elementary
60/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 22:123:1
Teaching staff16 teachers
Avg. experience15.5 years
Fully credentialed97%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$59,513 – $120,894
Principal salary$147,722 – $0
Superintendent salary$246,960

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $28,219, CA average $14,815$28,219 · spent at this school
Federal share$532 per student

$532 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,993 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction68%
Instruction support7%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,729 per pupil
2019$14,815 per pupil
2018$14,200 per pupil
2017$13,579 per pupil
2016$12,654 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic93.0%
District 94.4% · CA 56.1%
White3.8%
District 2.8% · CA 19.9%
Other3.2%
District 1.6% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 87.1% (23pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$100K · CA $85K
Median home value$721K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+22% · CA 35%
ZIP population39,387
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 186 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 31% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lake Marie Elementary a good elementary school?

Lake Marie Elementary has a Scope Score of 60 out of 100, placing it in the 81st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,063 statewide. 18.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lake Marie Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 42.2% of students at Lake Marie Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 160 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lake Marie Elementary rank in California?

Lake Marie Elementary ranks #1,063 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 81st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lake Marie Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lake Marie Elementary increases by 20.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lake Marie Elementary?

15.1% of students at Lake Marie Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lake Marie Elementary compare to other schools in Whittier?

Lake Marie Elementary scores 60/100 (81st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 186 students. Use the schools in Whittier page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Lake Marie Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lake Marie Elementary in Whittier, 50.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lake Marie Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 17.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (50.5% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 93 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
18.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 48th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+20.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 91th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
42.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 50th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.1%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 55th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 54th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32417%21%21%42%38%−6
Grade 42421%29%25%25%50%+5
Grade 53219%44%19%19%63%+15
Grade 62914%41%24%21%55%+9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32417%8%29%46%25%−21
Grade 42421%17%38%25%38%−4
Grade 53219%22%34%25%41%+5
Grade 62914%17%28%41%31%−4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11329%22%59%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9350.5%+17+12
Hispanic/Latino10350.5%+17+12
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lake Marie Elementary ←6018.8%42.2%+20.31.1%
Cresson Elementary2.4 mi6628.0%60.0%+28.60.2%
Daniel Phelan Language Academy2.9 mi6433.4%62.6%+10.30.1%
Julia B. Morrison Elementary3.3 mi6137.1%61.2%−9.00.5%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194043#311614.7%48.7%9.8%1.9%-9.4pp
20223651#27966.9%23.4%29.6%2.7%+20.1pp
20234462#21749.0%32.2%25.7%1.5%+12.3pp
20243943#328012.9%25.9%15.9%2.0%-15.5pp
20256081#106318.8%42.2%15.1%1.1%+20.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.5%14.5%+6.0pp
Male11.0%14.8%+3.8pp
Hispanic/Latino9.5%15.2%+5.7pp
Students with Disabilities16.3%23.1%+6.8pp
English Learners3.9%6.7%+2.8pp
Homeless46.2%17.4%-28.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.3%15.6%+4.3pp
All Students9.8%14.6%+4.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction